Medilodge of Livingston
3003 W Grand River, Howell, MI 48843 · For profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (517) 546-4210 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (27) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.0% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.1% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.7% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.9% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.1% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.8% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.5% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.1% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.0%CMS range 35.8–64.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.5–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.6%CMS range 6.5–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 97.1 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.25 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149991 and MI00150073. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the integrity of a mechanical transfer sling for one resident (R901) reviewed of three for accidents resulting in an avoidable fall requiring emergent transfer to a higher level of care and surgery for fractures sustained to the left and right lower extremities and pain. Findings include: A review of complaint reported to the State Agency included an allegation R901 was dropped from a mechanical (Hoyer) lift and sustained a fracture because the sling was not safe for use. On 2/11/25, a clinical record reviewed revealed R901 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a medical history of atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm) and required Eliquis (blood thinning medication), chronic osteomyelitis, and diabetes. R901 had an ADL (Activity of Daily Living) self-care deficit related to muscle weakness, reduced mobility, and morbid obesity. R901 required two persons assist and use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen and pantry in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the facility. Findings include:On 1/5/26 during an initial observation of the kitchen and pantry between 8:35 AM-9:15 AM, an observation of the main kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM 'H') and the Corporate Registered Dietician (RD 'G'). The following items were observed:The ice machine located near the meal prep area was observed to have black vents on the right and left sides of the unit that were visibly soiled with a thick layer of dust. When asked about who maintained the ice machine, CDM 'H' reported that was the responsibility of the maintenance staff.The reach in freezer had a cardboard box that was opened and inside was a clear plastic bag with frozen beef patties. The clear plastic bag was not sealed and open with visible ice crystals on the tops of the beef patties.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake 2670486.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide proper hand hygiene procedure during medication administration for two (R112, R09) of four residents reviewed for medication administration.Findings include:On 1/6/26 at 9:38 AM, a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B for R112 and was observed donning clear gloves in the bathroom without washing hands prior. LPN B then placed the right gloved hand to pull the privacy curtain, then proceed to inject insulin into their left lower abdomen.LPN B was then observed at the medication cart, after using hand sanitizer, opened their blue zipper shoulder bag, retrieved a marker to date the bottle, rezipped the bag, moved items on the cart, then opened the new bottle puncturing the safety seal and prepared the medication (Miralax-laxative medication) without cleaning hands.At 9:49 AM LPN B was observed providing medication and administering a health shake to R09 with no hand hygiene.On 1/6/26 at 10:10 AM, a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident's right to be treated with dignity and respect for one (R96) reviewed for dignity, resulting in facility staff searching a resident's personal possessions without giving the resident the opportunity to decline.Findings include:Clinical record review documented R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] requiring dialysis (medical procedure to remove waste products from the blood) because of acute kidney failure due to rhabdomyolysis (muscle breaks down and releases toxins into the blood and kidneys). R96's Skilled Medical Assessment documented on 12/25/25 confirmed R96 was orientated to person, place, date, and time.On 1/5/26 at 11:25 AM, during initial interview and introduction, R96 was observed sitting on the side of the bed, with the center of their white mustache colored yellow as if nicotine stained, had a faint odor of cigarettes and was visibly upset. When inquired, R96 revealed just prior to this interview, they went…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts to resolve a complaint/grievance regarding the disposal of fresh purchased personal food items for one resident (R29) of one reviewed for grievances.Findings include:R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with end stage kidney disease, required in house hemodialysis, and was legally blind. A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score assessed on 12/19/25 totaling 13/15 indicated R29 was cognitively intact.On 1/5/26 at approximately 11:30 AM, during initial introductions and interview, R29 voiced approximately two months ago, they had ordered a delivery for JETS Pizza. The following day when requested to have their leftovers, R29 was informed the kitchen staff had thrown the pizza into the garbage because it was not dated. R29 said he is blind and relied on the staff to label his food. R29 remarked the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) said they would reimburse $40.00 for the cost of the meal and Certified Dietary Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for medication administration for two (R114, R09) of four residents reviewed for the medication administration task.Findings include:On 1/6/26 at 9:55 AM, an observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D was at the C-Hall medication cart #1 reading aloud from the computer screen the Medication Administration Record (MAR) orders for R114's morning medications to LPN B who was observed at C-Hall medication cart #2, pulling the medications as LPN D read them off.On 1/6/26 at 12:07 PM, a record review of R09's MAR was reconciled from the earlier medication administration observation with LPN B and revealed the medications were documented as signed off by LPN D. LPN B was interviewed and when the MAR was reviewed, they had identified that it was their error, had not signed in under their log in, and charted on another nurse's credentials.On 1/6/26 at 12:07 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the medications that were pulled for R114 should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a Safe Smoking Assessment of one resident (R96) of one reviewed for smoking.Findings include:Clinical record review documented R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] requiring dialysis (medical procedure to remove waste products from the blood) because of acute kidney failure due to rhabdomyolysis (muscle breaks down and releases toxins into the blood and kidneys). R96's Skilled Medical Assessment documented on 12/25/25 confirmed R96 was orientated to person, place, date, and time.On 1/5/26 at 9:22 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed at Entrance Conference, that the facility was a non-smoking facility, no residents currently resided that smoked, and if residents are smokers, they can receive a nicotine patch.On 1/5/26 at 11:25 AM, during initial interview and introduction, R96 was observed sitting on the side of the bed, with the center of their white mustache colored yellow as if nicotine stained, had a faint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure accurate accounting for an administered controlled medication (refers to drugs that are regulated due to their potential for abuse and dependance) for one resident (R09) of one reviewed for controlled medication administration.Findings include:On 1/6/26 at 9:38 AM, a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B for R09 who was to receive Ativan (a benzodiazepine classified as a controlled medication to treat anxiety, insomnia, and other related conditions) 0.5 milligram (mg) every 12 hours. Review of the controlled substance binder for the medication identified the nurse who last administered the medication identified as LPN C did not document the date or time the medication was last administered. LPN B proceeded to fill in the blank areas stating the nurse did not do it.On 1/6/26 at 9:41 AM, LPN B saw the Nursing Home Administer (NHA) in proximity and was observed telling the NHA they need to call LPN C because they did not sign out their narcotic book.On 1/6/26 at 1:10 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2647121Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for one resident (R901) of three residents reviewed for Changes in condition. Findings include:On [DATE] a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R903 did not have any support services while at the facility. On [DATE] the medical record for R903 was reviewed and revealed the following: R903 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Opioid dependence, depression and Dependence on renal dialysis. A Psychiatry Initial Evaluation dated [DATE] revealed the following: Chief Complaint-Depression, anxiety and insomnia-History of Present Illness- .was initially admitted to [Name of facility] on 5-9-2025 for long-term care due to requiring 24-hour assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living), skilled nursing care, and medication management. Social worker requested psychiatric evaluation regarding patient's increased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #2584966Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received scheduled showers for one (R801) out of one resident reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care. Findings include:A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged there were not enough staff at the facility to ensure they received their showers.On 8/27/25 at approximately 9:30 AM, R801 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer all questions asked. When quired as to whether they received scheduled showers, R801 replied that they finally got a shower yesterday (8/26/25) but was not regularly receiving them and often only received a bed bath. R801 noted that they need a shower to ensure cleanliness.A review of R801's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: type II diabetes and acute respiratory failure. A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #2588818.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform respiratory assessments upon admission and before and after breathing treatment administration for one (R802) of one resident reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include: A review of R802's clinical record revealed R802 was admitted into the facility on 5/23/25, readmitted on [DATE], and discharged on 8/11/25 with diagnoses that included: chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen level), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), history of lung cancer, and end stage renal disease (ESRD). R802 was dependent on a mechanical ventilator for breathing, had a tracheostomy (a surgical hole in the windpipe to assist with breathing), and received renal dialysis. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R802 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for care. Further review of R802's clinical record revealed R802 was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 16 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently ensure physician approved recommendations from the pharmacist were implemented for three (R4, R10, R19, R77) of four residents reviewed for medication regimen reviews. Findings include: R4 Review of R4's monthly medication regimen review (MRR) revealed on 8/1/24 pharmacist documented Resident is on digoxin. Please consider daily apical pulse readings prior to digoxin along with 'hold' parameters if pulse less than 60, to monitor rhythm and rate. A review of the facility's MRR binder revealed that the facility physician indicated that they agreed with the pharmacist recommendation however a review of R4's digoxin order and medication administration record revealed the recommendations were not carried out. R10 Review of R10's MRR revealed on 4/1/24 pharmacist documented 1 rec (recommendation) to physician. No physician response was found in the facility's MRR binder. On 10/14/24 at approximately 2:44 PM, the DON was notified of the missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage and labeling in two of three carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 8:10 AM, an observation of Medication Cart C Hall #2 was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H and revealed on the bottom of the second drawer, loose medications were not contained in bottles, or blister packs. Observation included: 1 white round pill, 1 orange oval pill, 1 tan oval pill, and ½ tablet of a purple pill and LPN H commented it was midodrine (a medication to raise blood pressure). An open albuterol inhaler (medication to relax the airways and ease breathing) was identified as not dated. LPN H acknowledged the box was opened and not dated per protocol by dating the box. On 10/15/24 at 8:40 AM, an observation of Medication Cart E 500 Hall was conducted LPN I and revealed the first drawer had a bottle of opened nitroglycerin (medication to relieve chest pain) with no resident identifiers. LPN I commented that it was for a resident who experienced chest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff maintained professional standards, and practices for one (R239) resident of four reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 7:43 AM, LPN H was observed preparing ordered Oxycodone (narcotic given for pain) 10 milligram (mg) for R239. When the narcotic log was reviewed, 17 tablets of Oxycodone 10 mg were documented, and the blister pack revealed 16 tablets. LPN H commented the medication was given to R239 at 4:30 AM, and acknowledged the medication was not documented in the narcotic log. Review of the facilities policy title; Medication Administration dated 1/2023 documented: .If medication is a controlled substance sign the narcotic book .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise/implement effective interventions to prevent reoccurring falls for one resident (R22) of one residents reviewed for accidents/hazards/supervision. Findings include: On 10/13/24 at approximately 9:05 a.m., R22 was observed in the day room, wheeling around in their wheelchair. R22 was observed to have anti-tippers installed on their wheelchair indicating R22 was a high risk for falling. At that time, Nurse J was queried regarding the staffing levels on the unit and if they had enough staff to properly supervise R22 and they reported that having two CNA Certified Nursing Assistants) on the unit made it difficult to watch all the residents who were a fall risk and stated they reported that they liked to have three CNA's to ensure everyone was watched. On 10/13/24 the medical record for R22 was reviewed and revealed the following: R22 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including History (hx) of Falling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Physician's order for enteral nutrition for one resident (R78) of one residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: On 10/13/24 at approximately 8:54 a.m., R78 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R78 was observed to have enteral formula infusing with Jevity 1.5 at 60ml (milliliters) per hour with 55 ml an hour on autoflush. On 10/13/24 at approximately 10:29 a.m., R78 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R78 was still observed to have enteral formula infusing with Jevity 1.5 at 60ml per hour with 55ml an hour autoflush. The rate was not written on the bottle that was hung on the feeding pole. On 10/13/24 at approximately 10:41 a.m., R78's enteral feeing was observed with the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) and the enteral order was confirmed in the EMR (electronic medical record) as Osmolite 1.5 @ 70ml/hour X18 hours/day. The ADON indicated they would get the correct formula and change the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided for two residents (R10) was well as two anonymous residents who participated in the group meeting, out of a total census of 90 resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: On 10/13/24 the payroll based journal report (a report generated from the facility reported staffing hours) was reviewed and documented that during the fiscal quarter three (April 1, 2024-June 30th, 2024) the facility had excessively low weekend staffing numbers and had a one star staffing rating (the lowest score). On 10/14/24 at approximately 2:06 p.m., during the anonymous group meeting, the residents were queried if the facility had enough Nursing staff to meeting their needs. Two residents (who wished to remain anonymous) reported the facility had recently improved but that the staffing during the night over the summer months was bad. They indicated that Nurse aides would come in and tell them they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to PRN (as needed) psychotropic mediation administration for one resident (R22) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: On 10/13/24 the medical record for R22 was reviewed and revealed the following: R22 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including History (hx) of Falling, Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Dementia. A review of R22's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/21/24 revealed R22 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R22's cognition was documented as having memory impairments. A Physician's order dated 10/7/24 revealed the following: Ativan Oral Tablet 1 MG (Lorazepam) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed (PRN) for Anxiety for 14 Days. A review of R22's comprehensive careplan revealed the following: Focus-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper hand washing facilities during a hot water outage, resulting in the potential for food contamination from employee hands and the increased risk of foodborne illness, affecting all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 11/28/23 at 11:17 AM, while the Surveyor was washing hands, it was observed that the hand sink wasn't providing hot water. At this time, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) I stated that they currently do not have hot water, and haven't had it for at least a couple of weeks. At this time, staff were observed to wash hands at the hand sink with no hot water. During an interview on 11/28/23 at 11:45 AM, CDM I stated that they aren't using the three-compartment sink while the hot water is out. The dish machine was observed to have a booster heater and utilized chemicals as a sanitizing agent. During an interview with Maintenance Director C on 11/28/23 at 11:53 AM, he stated that the heat exchanger on the boiler broke in early November affecting the kitchen, B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment and flooring were maintained in a sanitary manner for two (R75, R15) of five residents whose room environment was observed, resulting in unsanitary conditions, a non-homelike environment, and increased risk for harborage of bacteria. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Routine Cleaning and Disinfection dated 2/1/2022: .It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible .Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from objects and surfaces and is normally accomplished manually or mechanically using water and detergents or enzymatic products .Consistent surface cleaning and disinfection will be conducted with a detailed focus on high touch areas to include, but not limited to .Monitor control panels, touch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent pests, harborage conditions, and clean pest droppings, resulting in pest droppings in five resident rooms (room #'s 201, 203, 208, 214, and 404). Findings include, On 11/28/23, during an environmental tour between 1:23 PM and 3:20 PM, the following observations were made. - Mouse droppings were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] behind the Bed 2. - Mouse droppings were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] behind Bed 2 and around the free standing wardrobe. - Mouse droppings were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] behind Bed 2. - Mouse droppings were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] behind Bed 2. - Mouse droppings were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] behind Bed 2. During an interview on 11/28/23 at 1:23 PM, Maintenance Director C stated that they have a pest control company come to the facility monthly to treat for pests. A review of the pest control Service Report, dated 11/15/23, noted that the nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00140111 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to contact the resident's responsible party following a fall for one (R22) of two residents reviewed for falls/notification of change. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged the resident fell out of bed and the facility failed to notify the resident's legal representative. On 11/28/23 at approximately 9:02 AM, R22 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert but does not speak due to cancer of the larynx. When asked as to whether they had ever fallen at the facility, R22 was not able to provide a clear response. A review of R22's clinical record documented the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Cancer of Larynx, Respiratory failure and dementia. A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5/15 (significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was immediately reported to the State Agency (SA) for one (R61) of one resident reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 11/28/23 at 11:57 AM, R61 was observed in bed using a cell phone. R61 was interviewed about the care received at the facility, R61 stated that there was an issue with getting bed baths timely and that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H had given the resident a bed bath on Saturday but CNAH did not clean the bottom half of their body. R61 stated that there was a bowel movement made and needed to be cleaned up so the call light was initiated, a different CNA answered the light, stated that R61 just had a bed bath so they would do a brief change. R61 stated, CNA H never changed or cleaned my bottom half. Further conversation revealed that later during the shift when CNAH came to change R61 she removed the dirty brief and was shaking it in R61 face stated, here you see this, this the dirty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure effective interventions to reduce pressure and promote the healing of pressure ulcers were in place for one resident (R34) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 11/28/23 at approximately 9:55 a.m. R34 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R34 was observed to have a skin impairment on their right heel. R34's right heel was observed to be flush to the mattress without being offloaded or any pressure reducing boots applied. On 11/29/23 at approximately 9:23 a.m., 12:09 p.m., and 12:38 p.m., R34 was observed in their room, laying in their bed in the same position. R34 was still observed with their right heel off of the pillow, flush with the mattress without any pressure being offloaded. On 11/30/23 at approximately 9:52 a.m., and 11:00 a.m., R34 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R34's right heel was observed to be off of a pillow, flush with the mattress without pressure being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00136011. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely implement and consistently monitor and care for a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube sites for two (R's 239 & 61) of four residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: R239 Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part . Complainant states the resident still has feeding tube in and when she checked him over, it looked like it was infected. The complainant states she found the nurse and the nurse didn't even know the resident has a feeding tube . 4/2/23 (visit) . Looked at food port, still red but no puss . told it is getting cleaned twice a day . Review of the medical record revealed R239 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: cerebral infarction due to thrombosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, dysphagia, aphasia, cognitive communication deficit, gastrostomy status, hypertension,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine maintenance and cleaning of an AVAP (Average Volume Assured Pressure Support - a non-invasive ventilator) in accordance with professional standards and manufacturer's recommendations for one (R2) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: On 11/28/23 at 10:26 AM, R2 was observed seated at a table in the activity room. The resident wore a mask that went into their nose, with tubing secured to the top of their head and connected to a machine that rested on the table and an oxygen concentrator near the table. When asked about the tubing and nasal mask, R2 reported that was an AVAP and when they first arrived at the facility, they had been using their AVAP from home but had recently been supplied from (name of local respiratory equipment company) since they were remaining in the facility long-term. When asked how often the facility cleaned the respiratory equipment, mask and supplies, R2 reported they could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-07 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent recertification survey were readily accessible to residents, their family members, and their legal representatives and failed to post a notice of availability of survey reports for the past three years. This has the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: On 1/6/26 at 1:00 PM, a resident council interview was conducted with seven residents who wished to remain anonymous. When queried about access to the results of previous surveys, all seven residents reported they did not know where to find the survey results. On 1/6/26 at 2:20 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 'A' (a former Director of Nursing in the facility). When queried about where the results of the previous survey inspections were located, RN 'A' said a binder was located in the front lobby which required a code to open the door (end enter the lobby). The binders were located in a pile behind the front desk off to the side. On 1/6/26 at 2:24 PM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTURY OPCO GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2016 |
| B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2016 |
| B&Y TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2016 |
| CODY HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2016 |
| CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2016 |
| NORCROSS, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2016 |
| ROGERS, STACEY | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2016 |
| KIRK, KRISTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2016 |
| FLASHNER, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2016 |
| PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2016 |
| CENTURY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2016 |
| PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235330. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.