Medilodge of Grand Blanc
11941 Belsay Road, Grand Blanc, MI 48439 · For profit - Corporation · 146 certified beds · (810) 694-1970 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.5% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.8% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.1% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.9% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.3% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.9% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.5% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.5% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.94 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 36.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.3%CMS range 38.3–64.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 9.3–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 36.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 31.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.3–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 126.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.42 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for one resident (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall with fracture. Findings include:Resident #3 (R3): R3 most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include a right femur fracture, a left femur fracture, muscle wasting and repeated falls. On 02/22/2026 at 1:07PM, during an interview, R3 was asked if he had sustained any falls while in the facility. R3 stated that in September he fell out of bed while receiving a bed bath. R3 stated that one staff member left the room while another staff member performed the bed bath. R3 stated the staff member had rolled him in the bed and was behind him drying his back. R3 said he told the staff member performing the bed bath that he was sliding off the bed and they didn't help me and then I hit the floor. R3 stated that he broke both of his legs, chipped his tooth and was hospitalized . R3 was asked if either of the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that clean linens were consistently available to meet residents' needs. This resulted in delayed incontinence care and bathing for one resident (Resident #103) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Resident #103 (R103):A record review of the face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: diabetes mellitus (DM), failure to thrive, muscle weakness, protein calorie malnutrition, bipolar II (mental health disorder of mood cycling between high and low) and difficulty in walking. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 and was dependent on care for toileting and shower/bathing.On 05/27/2026 at 12:10PM, Nurse A was asked to open the linen closet on west 100 hall, the observation of the linen closet revealed the following contents: 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to intake Number 2997144.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with respect and dignity during the provision of care for one resident (Resident #102) of five residents reviewed for dignity with care. Findings include: Resident #102 (R102): A record review of the face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: acute respiratory failure with a tracheostomy (artificial patent airway), cardiac arrest (heart attack), dependance on renal dialysis, diabetes mellitus (DM), muscle weakness and obesity. The MDS assessment, dated 05/14/2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 and was functionally dependent on assistance for care. On 05/20/2026 at 9:05 AM, during an interview with Family Member A she said that CNA B had apologized to R102 for her behavior, and that CNA B told them,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to intake Number 3011645.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive, resident centered care plans were implemented as written for one resident (Resident #105) out of five residents reviewed for care plan implementation.Findings include: Resident #105 (R105):A record review of the face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: chronic respiratory failure with a tracheostomy (artificial patent airway) dependent on ventilator (machine that supports breathing), muscular dystrophy (MS / loss of muscle mass), muscle weakness, depression and anxiety. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 and was functionally dependent on assistance for care.On 05/20/2026 at 1:15PM, during an interview, R105expressed concern that his nails had not been clipped and his facial hair was unshaven. R105…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 02/23/2026 at 8:55am during the kitchen tour with Certified Dietary Manager D and Regional Dietician E, observed a loose cap to the atmospheric vacuum breaker on the water line to the dishwasher. During this observation, CDM D was interviewed on the broken backflow preventer, and she stated that a contractor came out to repair it a couple weeks ago because it was spewing out water. According to the FDA 2022 Food Code, 5-205.15 System Maintained in Good Repair, A plumbing system shall be: repaired according to law.and maintained in good repair. On 02/23/2026 at 9:01am observed the drain line to the ice machine sitting directly inside a drain. According to the 2022 Food Code, 5-202.13 Backflow Prevention, Air Gap, An air gap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture, equipment, or nonfood equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, 1) The facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program, encompassing outcome surveillance, accurate data documentation/analysis resulting in potential infection and the spread of microorganisms and illness to all 126 facility residents, and 2) the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings include: DPS One: Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program, encompassing outcome surveillance, accurate data documentation/analysis resulting in potential infection and the spread of microorganisms and illness to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive antibiotic stewardship program including analysis and ongoing evaluation of appropriate antibiotic use resulting in the potential development of antibiotic-resistant organisms and inappropriate antibiotic use for all 126 facility residents. Findings include:An interview and review of the facility infection control antibiotic stewardship program was completed on 2/25/26 at 1:02 PM with Infection Control Registered Nurse (RN) P and the Director of Nursing (DON). January 2026's infection control data was reviewed with RN P. When asked what criteria the facility utilizes to assess resident for infection and initiation of antibiotics, RN P stated, McGeer. The line listing documentation did not include if infection/antibiotic use criteria had been met. Additionally, the symptoms section was blank on several of the residents listed who had received antibiotics. When queried if criteria was met for each antibiotic and/or antimicrobial medication prescribed on the line list including how…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a dignified manner, call lights were within reach, and needs were met timely for five residents (#4, #42, #45, #53, #122) and a confidential group of residents. Findings include:Resident 4 (R4): On 2/22/26 at 1:16 PM, an observation was made of R4 lying in bed. The Resident was interviewed, answered questions and engaged in conversation. The Resident was asked about concerns with care received by the facility. The Resident expressed concerns with call light, when she put it on, sometimes it took a long time for staff to answer. When asked if she had times when the call light was not answered for 30 minutes or longer, the Resident stated, Oh hell yes, especially at nighttime. The Resident reported using the call light for assistance, getting ice or ice water, and for pain medication. The Resident reported that when she used the call light to get pain medication, she would have to wait for them to answer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number 2627046. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize procedures to ensure that Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided to six residents (#1, #2, #9, #16, #82, and #123) of eleven residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of daily and hygiene care for dependent residents.Findings include:Resident 82 (R82): On 2/22/26 at 12:35 PM, an observation was made of Resident 82 in his room. The Resident was interviewed, answered questions and engaged in limited conversation with some answers/conversation not understood. An observation was made of R82 with facial hair. When asked if he liked to be close shaven or would rather have a beard, the Resident reported he liked a goatee and indicated he liked the mustache, around his mouth and over his chin. When asked about the hair growth that was on his checks, the Resident reported it was long there. An observation was made of R82's fingernails that were long, a couple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain nebulizer equipment (a medical device that turns liquid medication into a fine mist to be inhaled directly into the lungs for treatment of respiratory conditions) in a sanitary manner for four residents (#16, $#84, #118 and #119), of seven residents reviewed for respiratory care and ventilator/tracheostomy care. Findings include:Resident #16: On 2/22/26 at 12:09 PM, Resident #16 was observed in their room. The Resident was in bed, had a tracheostomy and was receiving mechanical ventilation. The Resident did not respond when spoke to. A connected nebulizer administration set dated 1/25 was present in a clear bag hanging behind the ventilator machine. A visible, dried, crystalized substance was observed in the medication administration chamber of the nebulizer. Record review revealed Resident #16 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were completed appropriately and the care plan for advance directives was updated for one resident (R130) of six residents reviewed for advance directives, resulting in one cognitively impaired resident changing their code status and an inaccurate care plan. Findings include:Resident #130 (R130): R130 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include peripheral vascular disease, heart disease, hypertension and cognitive communication deficit. R130 expired at the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 10:18AM, record review revealed a physician's order for do not resuscitate (DNR) dated [DATE] at 10:39am. Record review also revealed a physician's order for Full Resuscitate, dated [DATE] and it was discontinued on [DATE], when the DNR order was placed. On [DATE] at 10:21AM, the care plan for R130 was reviewed, a care plan for advance directives was present and stated, Resident has chosen not to formulate advanced care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physical restraints were not used for staff convenience for one resident (Resident #118) of one resident reviewed, resulting in restriction of mobility. Findings include: Resident #118:Resident #118 was observed in their room on 2/22/26 at 12:32 PM. The Resident was in bed, positioned on their back. The bed was at normal height and fall mats were in place. The two upper side rails on the Resident's bed were raised. Resident #118 was receiving mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy and did not respond when spoke to. Record review revealed Resident #118 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke) with resulting right sided hemiplegia/hemiparalysis (one sided paralysis) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia, gastrostomy (surgically created opening in the abdomen to the to stomach for the administration of nutrition and medications), neuromuscular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for one resident (Resident #32) of one resident reviewed for MDS discrepancies.Findings include:Resident #32 (R32):A review of R32's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, sciatica, and the history of falling. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 that indicated severe problems with memory or thinking.A record review of R32's MDS assessment dated [DATE], section N-Medications indicated: N0300. Injections: Record the number of days that injections of any type were received during the last 7 days or since admission/entry. entry 7 (days). and N0350. A. Insulin injections: Record the number of days that insulin injections were received during the last 7 days. entry 7 (days); B. Orders for insulin: Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement planned interventions for contracture management for one resident (Resident #16) of three residents reviewed resulting in lack of application of splints. Findings include:Resident #16:On 2/22/26 at 12:09 PM, Resident #16 was observed in their room. The Resident was in bed, positioned on their back with their head turned slightly to the left. Resident #16 had a tracheostomy and was receiving mechanical ventilation. The Resident's eyes were closed, and they did not respond to verbal stimulation. Resident #16's hands were bent towards their inner arm at the wrist joint as though contracted and their legs were bent at the knees. The Resident did not have any devices including splints/braces in place on their upper and/or lower extremities. Record review revealed Resident #16 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure, right and left knee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that tube feeding was administered per professional standards of practice and the plan of care for one resident (Resident #40) of two residents reviewed. Findings include: Resident #40: On 2/23/26 at 10:40 AM, Resident #40 was observed in their room. The Resident was in bed, positioned on their back. The head of Resident #40's bed was elevated at 17 degrees per protractor tool, and they were receiving tube feeding via infusion pump at a rate of 43 milliliters (mL) per hour. At 10:47 AM on 2/23/26, Registered Nurse (RN) Z was asked to come into Resident #40's room. When asked how high the head of the Resident's bed was elevated, RN Z stated, I don't know. 20 or 30 degrees, I'm not good at that. RN Z was then asked was the head of the head should be elevated to when a resident is receiving tube feeding and replied, 30 degrees in a questioning tone. RN Z proceeded to elevate the head of Resident #40's bed and exit the room. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number 2607274.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an appropriate resident assessment, physician's order, develop a care plan, and provide entrapment measurements to ensure that a resident is free from physical restraint for one resident (Resident #107) (R107) of 3 residents reviewed for use of side rails. Findings include:Resident #107 (R107):R 107 was observed in his room on September 10, 1925, at 2:00 PM. R107 was awake, lying in bed with an ongoing continuous tube feeding via pump being delivered, while R107 was restless in bed. The bed was observed in the lowest position; however, R107 appeared to be attempting to get out of bed, but the side rail was preventing him from falling out of the bed. It was noted that the floormat was placed on the floor on his right side. R107 had a padded full rail attached to the bed.During observation, Nurse K on 9/10/25 at 2:05 PM, was asked why R107 had a bedrail. Nurse K revealed he is a fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake Number 2607274.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented according to the plans of care for two residents (Resident #107 and Resident #104) of the three residents reviewed for Infection Prevention and Control. Findings include: Resident #107 (R107): A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was conducted on 9/10/25 at 12:00 PM. R107 was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease with dependence on Renal Dialysis. R107 had a gastrostomy, a hemodialysis port, difficulty walking, and muscle weakness in addition to other diagnoses. R107's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) Score assessed on 6/24/25 was 04/15. A BIMS score of 4 /15 indicates severe cognitive impairment. R107's Care Plan was noted: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) required two-person assistance for Bathing, Bed Mobility, Dressing, Personal Hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #1223361Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that an adequate supply of clean linen was distributed and consistently delivered to residents' areas on a daily basis.Findings include:An observation tour with the Administrator was conducted on [DATE], between 2:55 PM and 3:15 PM. All six linen closets were checked. The Administrator agreed there was not a lot in each closet for the census of 125 residents in the facility, considering the time of day. She stated she is unsure of the laundry department schedule for hall deliveries.On [DATE] at 3:30 PM, an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant B (CNA B).CNA B has worked at the facility for 2 years and stated, Linen is a problem every day. I have to look for linen all the time. I go to the basement to find the linens I need because it is not in the closet. We had to go to nearby units, and sometimes they are all empty or lack the necessary items. I work a 12-hour shift from 7:00 AM to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00153753. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure measures were in place to prevent constipation for two Residents (#1 and #3) of 3 reviewed for constipation, resulting in the potential for discomfort, restlessness and adverse reactions. Findings Include: Resident #1: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Diabetes, End stage renal disease, renal dialysis, Cardiac arrest, seizures, Hepatitis B, anemia, acute and chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, feeding tube, hypertension and pneumonia. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive loss and needed assistance with all care. On 7/3/2025 at 11:25 AM, Resident #1 was observed lying in bed in his room, sleeping. Nurse Aides A and B assisted the resident to reposition in bed. They said he would wiggle lower in the bed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00152171. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a change in condition for one resident (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed, resulting in the family not being notified of a change in condition. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2): R2 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, apnea and peripheral vascular disease. R2 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating they are cognitively intact. On 04/24/25 record review of a progress noted dated 12/30/24 at 11:09 revealed, Resident is extremely tired this morning. He refused breakfast and has not gotten dressed or out of bed as he usually does. Resident also will not speak to nurse he was able to mumble that he was tired. Resident tested for Covid and flu A and B, all negative. Resident is afebrile and vitals are wnl. Provider aware. On 04/24/25 record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #705: A review of Resident #705's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 4/8/11 and re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, dependence on respirator status, Muscular Dystrophy and tracheostomy status. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15/15 that indicated intact cognition, the Resident had limited range of motion of bilateral upper extremities and was dependent on helper for activities of daily living, mobility and transfers. A review of the Facility Reported Incident investigation for Resident #703 of an interview written by Nurse C for Resident #705, dated 3/10/25 at 8:35 AM, that revealed: (Resident #705) asked for yankauer, she refused stating she doesn't do that you need to get respiratory to do it. I don't do respiratory job. (Resident #703) asked are you serious? She said yes and didn't do it. Then (Resident #705) asked her to cut the TV on and she mumbled to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00148741 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen, resulting in improper kitchen sanitization of all kitchenware utilized to prepare and plate resident meals, soiled floors and ice machine potentially affecting all residents who consume meals from the kitchen Findings include: On 1/8/2025 at 10:05 AM, a tour of the kitchen was completed in the presence of Registered Dietitians E & F. The following was observed: other bilateral handles to the reach in refrigerator had debris amassed inside the handles. other bottom of the individual toaster was [NAME] with dried on food reside and other large brunt like particles. oGreen speaker was sitting atop of the clean/ready to use dishware. Registered Dietitian E & F both stated that should not be there. [NAME] the storage rack were 11 sheet pans that were still wet, as water droplets were still visible. When asked about this area it was explained dishware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to act on positive influenza laboratory results timely and operationalize policies and procedures for an influenza outbreak with two Residents (#30 and 45), of two residents reviewed for positive influenza, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection to residents, staff, surveyor and visitors. Findings include: During Resident Council on 1/9/2025 at 1:45 PM, Resident Council was held in the 400 Hall sitting room. There were nine residents in attendance two being Resident #30 & #45; of the nine residents the surveyor hosting the meeting and Resident #45 were the only two with masks on due to the outbreak status of the facility. At the conclusion of resident council, Resident #30 was observed in his room directly across the hall from the sitting room, as we spoke pleasantries at the doorway the droplet precaution sign was noticed hanging on his door that was completely ajar. It was further discovered from the doorframe name plates that his roommate is Resident #45. Upon review of their records, it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to curate an activities program that met the interest and needs of the facility residents, resulting in, activity programming being monotonous and lacking originality. With nine residents from resident council expressing feelings of frustrations, discontentment, and unimportance. Findings include: During Resident Council on 1/9/2025 at 1:45 PM, the nine residents in attendance were queried regarding the facility activity programming. The overarching tone of the group was they would enjoy a wider variety of activities that was of interest to residents that are cognitively intact. They shared the rarely attended resident council as they did not feel comfortable sharing their concerns as they were not confident they would be addressed. They were unanimous with the following areas of concern for the activity program as well: -Many of the programs are boring, and they have no interest in attending them. They provided an example of decorating the ashtray the day prior. -The activities are not well organized which causes undue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean/sanitary, safe, and homelike environment with soiled privacy curtains in rooms 207, 505, 507, 509; Call lights not within reach for Resident #3, #35, #105 and room [ROOM NUMBER]-1; Respiratory equipment not stored properly for Resident #102, #57 and #407 soiled wheelchairs, geri chairs and walker stored in the common/dining area on the 300 hall; ceiling tile coming down in the bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]; multiple bathrooms on the 300 hall with personal wash basins stored improperly and not labeled with resident information; denture cups in room [ROOM NUMBER] not properly labeled with resident information; and a lack of paper towel available in room [ROOM NUMBER], of 6 halls/units reviewed for environmental concerns, resulting in a lack of resident and staff safety, and the potential of needs not met, spread of infectious disease, and dissatisfaction of living conditions. Findings include: Common area/dining room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake MI00148741 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified and respectful care and treatment for two (# 4 and 61) of two residents and five of five residents observed during the dining task resulting in lack of supervision during meals as care planned for one resident (R39) and availability of equipment during dining, Resident #4 being exposed during care, and Resident #61 expressing delayed staff response to needs, unnecessary incontinence, discourteous and rude staff, lack of adaptive communication devices, and Resident verbalization of feelings of fear, anxiety, and frustration. Findings include: Resident #61 On 1/8/25 at 12:04 PM, Resident #61 was observed in their room laying in in bed with their eyes open wearing a hospital style gown. Resident #61 was receiving mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy. When spoke to, Resident #61 responded by mouthing words without making sound. Resident #61 had a cell phone on their bed. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive activity care plan for one (#61) of one resident reviewed resulting in the potential for lack of meaningful activities and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #61: On 1/8/25 at 12:04 PM, Resident #61 was observed in their room laying in in bed with their eyes open wearing a hospital style gown. Resident #61 was receiving mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy. When spoke to, Resident #61 responded by mouthing words without making sound. When asked if they were able to write and/or type, Resident #61 indicated they could. A method for written communication such as a white board and/or paper, pen and/or pencil were not present in the room. When queried about level of assistance needed to get out of bed and facility activities, Resident #61 revealed staff are not responsive to call lights and/or requests for assistance. At 12:50 PM on 1/8/25, an interview was completed with Resident #61. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake MI00148741 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of the necessary services to ensure timely response and assistance for completion of Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care for three (#'s 39, 43, and 61) of seven residents reviewed resulting dependent residents not receiving timely care including repositioning, toileting, and hygiene and resident verbalization of discomfort and feelings of frustration and embarrassment. Findings include: Resident #43: On 1/09/25 at 7:59 AM, Resident #43 was observed in bed, positioned on their back with the head of the bed elevated in a high seated position. Upon entering the room, the distinct odor of urine and bowel movement were noted. The odor grew in intensity closer to Resident #43. The Resident was receiving mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy. When asked how they were, Resident #43 replied, My neck hurt. Resident #43 was asked how long their neck had been hurting and if they had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat a change in condition timely for one resident (Resident #30) of one resident reviewed for delay in treatment, resulting in the potential for exacerbation of signs and symptoms of pneumonia, sepsis, extended illness and wellbeing. Findings include: Resident #30: A review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 1/11/24 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, influenza, and sepsis. A review of Resident #30's medical record of progress notes revealed the following: 12/29/24 at 6:54 PM, Progress Notes, Note Text: pt (patient) had c/o (complaints of) cough and chills this evening I took pt temp. it was 98. I did a Covid and influenza test they all came back negative. Pt requested cough syrup for his cough on on-call messaged and gave order for prn (as needed) cough syrup QID (four times a day). I put in house stock cough syrup and gave it to the pt. 12/31/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to enact care-planned interventions for safety/monitoring/supervision for Residents (#4, 35 and 39) of 9 reviewed for accident hazards and feeding assistance, resulting in the potential for injury for Resident #4 transferred with a mechanical lift with one staff assist, fall with injury for Resident #35 who did not have a call light within reach and a fall mat placed at the bedside, and the potential for choking or aspiration of food for Resident #39. Findings include: Resident #4: A review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (MS), dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy and Alzheimer's disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9/15 that indicated moderately impaired cognition, and the resident was dependent with most activities of daily living and transfers. On 1/10/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide catheter care in accordance with current clinical standards for one (#50) resident of 1 resident reviewed for catheters, resulting in, Resident #50 returning from the emergency room with a urinary catheter unbeknownst to the facility and without proper assessment, monitoring and ongoing care. Findings Include: Resident #50: During initial tour on 1/8/2025, Resident #50 was observed in bed conversing with his wife. Observed hanging on the bed frame was a catheter drainage bag that was partially full of urine. Resident #50 explained he recently was evaluated at the Emergency Room, and they placed a catheter. On 1/8/2024 at approximately 3:45 PM, a review was completed of Resident #50's medical record and it indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Fracture of left tibia shaft, left fibula shaft, right and left patella, right talus, epilepsy, heart disease and dysphagia. Resident #50 is dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral tube feeding (liquid nourishment provided directly into the stomach through a feeding tube) administration was per Health Care Provider orders and professional standards of practice for one resident (#55) of three Residents reviewed, resulting insufficient head of bed elevation during tube feeding administration and the potential for aspiration, infection, and decline in overall health. Findings include: Resident #55: On 1/9/25 at 8:31 AM, Resident #55 was observed in their room in bed, positioned on their back. Resident #55 was receiving mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy and tube feeding via pump. The Head of the Resident's bed at a 24-degree angle per the measurement device on the bed and correlated with a angle measurement device. When spoke to, Resident #55 did not make eye contact and did not provide a verbal response. Record review revealed Resident #55 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for management and care of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (catheter line inserted into the arm and extends to the heart for long term administration of intravenous [IV] medications- PICC) line for one (#280) of one Resident reviewed resulting in a PICC line not being flushed following medication administration and the potential for malfunction, occlusion, blood clot formation, and infection. Findings include: Resident #280: On 1/9/25 at 8:49 AM, Resident #280 was observed laying in their bed in their room. Registered Nurse (RN) P was present in the room. When asked, RN P revealed they had just finished administering the Resident's medications. Resident #280 made eye contact when spoke to but did not provide verbal or meaningful non-verbal responses to questions. An IV pump was in place on the left side of the bed. The pump was turned off with an empty bag of IV Cefepime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to acquire medication timely from pharmacy services or obtain from back-up medication storage for one resident (Resident #45), of seven reesidents reviewed for medication regimen review, resulting in medication Bumetanide and Spironolactone not administered as ordered and the potential of exacerbation of medical conditions. Findings include: Resident #45: A review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 7/22/24 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, dependence on supplemental oxygen, atherosclerotic heart disease, and acute kidney failure. A review of medication orders for Resident #45 revealed the following: Bumetanide 1 mg (milligram). Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for fluid retention related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with a start date on 7/23/24 and discontinued on 1/6/24. Bumetanide 1 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for fluid retention, ordered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the practitioner for one resident (Resident #45) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in Resident #45 not receiving the medication Bumetanide (a diuretic often used to reduce extra fluid in the body caused by conditions such as heart failure, liver disease, and kidney disease) and the medication Spironolactone (a diuretic often used to treat heart failure and high blood pressure), the residents need to have increased dosage of the medication Bumetanide and the potential for exacerbation of medical conditions. Findings include: Resident #45: A review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 7/22/24 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, dependence on supplemental oxygen, atherosclerotic heart disease, and acute kidney failure. A review of medication orders for Resident #45 revealed the following: -Bumetanide 1 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00148741. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promptly dispose of 24 pills of oxycodone (opioid used to manage pain) and maintain accurate and legible controlled medication reconciliation records for one (#61) resident of eight resident residents reviewed for narcotic reconciliation. Findings Include: On 1/14/2025 at 1:50 PM, Vent Medication Cart 3 in the presence of Wound Care Nurse R and Nurse S. While reviewing Resident #61's Controlled Substance Log for Oxycodone IR (immediate release) 5 MG (milligram) Tab (tablet) received on 5/19/2024. The sheet was found to have rows of crossed out entries, with what appeared to be multiple witnessed initials, but they were difficult to match up to the specific row given the disorganization of the narcotic form. The form showed Resident #61 was administered an oxycodone on 1/9/2025 at 0700, but there are no nurse initials. Observation was made of the blister pack and pill bubble #11 was circled in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure immunizations were reviewed and offered for/to Resident #45, of six residents reviewed for immunizations, resulting in the potential for lack of protection against infectious diseases and illnesses and spread of infection. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 8:55 AM, a review of Resident immunizations was conducted for the infection control task of the survey. Six residents were included in the review of immunizations. Resident #45 had been laboratory tested for Influenza with respiratory panel swab collected on 1/1/25 that resulted in positive results for influenza. A review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 7/22/24 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, dependence on supplemental oxygen and influenza. A review of Resident #45's medical record of Immunizations, revealed TB 2 Step Mantoux Skin Test date administered 10/3/24, Sars-Cov-2 (Covid-19) Moder date administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00143979. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent staff-to-resident abuse for one resident (Resident #604) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in a staff member using verbally abusive language towards Resident #604. Findings Include: Resident #604: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #604 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Paranoid schizophrenia, hypothyroidism, heart failure, anxiety, depression and intellectual disabilities. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had moderate cognitive decline with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8/15. The resident also needed assistance with all care. On 9/25/2024 at 10:00 AM, during an interview with the Administrator, she said there had been a Facility Reported Incident on 3/27/2024 for Resident #604 related to Staff Member J telling Resident #604 to Shut your mouth. The incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation will have two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS). DPS #1: This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00147169. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor and implement substantial interventions to prevent Resident #608's overdose, resulting in Resident #608 admitting with a Polysubstance abuse disorder of 40 + years without further facility follow-up, assessment or increased monitoring,and a fentanyl patch being applied in a reachable area resulting in subsequent ingestion of the patch, which resulted in an overdose. Findings Include: Resident #608: On 9/25/2024 at approximately 2:00 PM, a review was completed of Resident #608's medical records and it revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Femur Fracture, Major Depressive Disorder, Hypertension, Adjustment Disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood and diabetes. Further review of the resident's chart revealed the following: Discharge Hospital Records: .Pt (patient) has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00146559. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) gowning for treating one resident (Resident #605), resulting in the likelihood of contamination during Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube site care and the spread of infection. Findings include: Resident #605 (R605): On 9/29/24 at 1:00 PM, Nurse D was observed during a PEG tube care dressing change for R605, who was on an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) due to the resident's tracheostomy and gastrostomy status. On 9/28/24 at 3:00 PM, a review of R605's Electronic Medical Record revealed that R605 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with tracheostomy status, quadriplegia, Gastrostomy, and Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypoxia in addition to other diagnoses. Although R605's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was not performed, R605's Care Plan, initiated on 8/16/2023, was reviewed. The care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00146121. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain assessment was completed consistently and medication was administered as ordered over an extended period for one resident (Resident #901) of two residents (with acute displaced fracture of right ankle) reviewed for pain management. This deficient practice has the potential for reduced efficacy of the pain management regimen with prolonged pain. Findings include: Resident #901 (R901): R901 was admitted the facility on 5/14/24 for short-term skilled nursing and rehabilitation services after hospitalization. R901 was hospitalized for cellulitis of lower extremities and heart failure. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R901 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. R901 was living at home with their spouse and had a fall at home prior to the admission and hospital. A complaint received by the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper label and dating of foods with 69 residents consuming meals from the kitchen (34 residents receive nothing by mouth) resulting in increased risk of contaminated foods and the risk of food borne illness. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 01/02/2024 at 9:44 AM, the following was observed in the reach in refrigerator: Salsa and sour cream in a deep pan with a use by date of 12/24/2023 Cheese slices in a plastic container with a use by date of 12/26/2023 8 ham and cheese sandwiches in a pan with a use by date of 12/26/2023 During the initial tour, the Registered Dietitian (RD) E stated that the food items found should have been thrown out and pulled them out of the refrigerator and put them by the sink to be discarded. During an interview on 01/03/2024 at 11:45 AM, Dietary Supervisor (DS) L stated that RD E told her about the food items found the day before during the initial kitchen tour and said that these items were thrown out. Review of the Facility's Facts in Fifteen,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one Residents (#81) of 21 residents reviewed for accurate medical records resulting in missing, incomplete, and inaccurate information intentionally put in all 103 residents' medical charts routinely every Wednesday morning, pertinent to care needs with the potential for negative outcomes and the inability to accurately assess, monitor and update progress related to resident centered plans of care for this vulnerable population. Findings include: Resident #81 (R81) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 (R81) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic respiratory failure, Sepsis, End stage renal disease, vent dependent, atrial fibrillation, diabetes 2, muscle wasting, gastrostomy, dependent on renal dialysis, pressure ulcers and tracheostomy. According to Resident #81 (R81)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure required transfer and discharge documentation was completed for one (#81) of two residents reviewed for discharge. Resulting in the potential for ineffective or mismanaged continued care, as care plan goals were omitted from the transfer paperwork. Findings include: Resident #81 (R81) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 (R81) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic respiratory failure, Sepsis, End stage renal disease, vent dependent, atrial fibrillation, diabetes 2, muscle wasting, gastrostomy, dependent on renal dialysis, pressure ulcers and tracheostomy. According to Resident #81 (R81)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R81 scored 12 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R81 is dependent on eating, oral hygiene, toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet transfer/discharge documentation requirements for one of one reviewed (Resident #81) from a total of 21 sampled residents, resulting in the potential for residents and/or their representatives not obtaining their due rights. Findings include: Resident #81 (R81) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 (R81) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic respiratory failure, Sepsis, End stage renal disease, vent dependent, atrial fibrillation, diabetes 2, muscle wasting, gastrostomy, dependent on renal dialysis, pressure ulcers and tracheostomy. According to Resident #81 (R81)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R81 scored 12 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R81 is dependent on eating, oral hygiene, toileting, showering/bathing, getting dressed and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete and provide a baseline a care plan within 48 hours of admission 1 resident (resident # 401) of 4 reviewed for care plans, resulting in anxiety, frustration and the potential for unmet needs to be addressed in their plan of care. Findings include: Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 12/21/23, reflected Resident #401 (R401) was a [AGE] year old male with multiple medical comorbidities including a new tracheostomy. R401 admitted to the facility on 12/20, returned to the hospital on 12/21 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R401 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 01/03/23. R401 was his own decision maker and had no legal representative in place. On 01/02/24 at 02:44 PM, R401 was interviewed at bedside, he reported he wanted to be discharged home on 1/05/23 but facility staff had not spoken to him about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated and revised appropriately with new interventions for one (R81) out of 21 residents reviewed for care plan revision out of a total sample of 21 residents. This deficient practice resulted in lack of revision and implementation for a bowel regimen following a hospital stay for surgical removal of a bowel impaction. Findings include: Resident #60 (R60) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 (R60) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia, atrial fibrillation, muscle wasting, constipation, pain and incontinence of bowel and bladder. According to Resident #60 (R60)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R60 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R60 is dependent on transfers, getting dressed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL), including bathing/showering and nail care, for one resident (R#75) of three reviewed for ADL care completion resulting in missed bathing/showers, inadequate nail care and potential for feelings of embarrassment. Findings include: According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident # 75 (R75) was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease, end stage renal disease and aphasia. On 01/02/24 03:28 PM, R75 was observed resting in bed, his right hand was resting on his chest and was observed to have long fingernails that extended past his fingertips, under the nails dark debris was observed. R75 did not respond to verbal questions. On 01/04/24 at 08:41 AM, R75 was observed in bed, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D was present, R75's bilateral hands observed, CNA D uncurled R75's fingers from right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care, management, and documentation for one (R60) of one resident reviewed for bowel and constipation, of a total sample of 21, resulting in lack of appropriate monitoring and treatment, increasing the potential for another bowel impaction causing surgical removal and decline in overall health status. Findings include: Resident #60 (R60) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 (R60) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia, atrial fibrillation, muscle wasting, constipation, pain and incontinence of bowel and bladder. According to Resident #60 (R60)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R60 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R60 is dependent on transfers, getting dressed, toilet use and bathing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #90) the Physician was made aware of, and addressed medication monitoring requirements, resulting in the potential for adverse affects to occur. Findings Included: Per the facility face sheet Resident #90 (R90) was admitted on [DATE]. R90 had a listed diagnosis of, DEPENDENCE ON RENAL DIALYSIS. Review of Physician's orders (ordered by R90's primary physician) revealed that on 12/27/2023 at 11:35 AM, Vancomycin was ordered for R90 as follows, . (Vancomycin HCl [hydrochloride]) Use 1 gram intravenously one time a day every Mon, Wed, Fri, Sun for antibiotic until 01/05/2024 23:59 (11:59 PM) to be given on dialysis day by dialysis nurse, in dialysis. The order revealed the Vancomycin was discontinued on 12/28/2023. Review of R90's medication administration report (MAR) for the month of December 2023 revealed, (Vancomycin HCl) Use 1 gram intravenously one time a day every Mon, Wed, Fri, Sun for antibiotic until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccines as recommended by Centers for Disease Control, in three of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #2, #33 and #68) resulting in increased risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from pneumococcal disease. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/30/23, revealed he was [AGE] years old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener, score of 12 (08-12 Moderate Impairment). The same MDS indicated R2's pneumococcal vaccination was not up-to-date and was offered and declined. Informed Consent for Pneumococcal Vaccine signed 3/09/23, revealed in 2019 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice recommended two pneumococcal vaccines for adults [AGE] years of age or older) pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13) or pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPSV23)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-01-04 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one (R81) of one reviewed for transfer to the hospital, from a total sample of 21 residents, resulting in the inability at the time of transfer to make his decision regarding reserving a bed during a period of absence from the facility. Findings include: Resident #81 (R81) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 (R81) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic respiratory failure, Sepsis, End stage renal disease, vent dependent, atrial fibrillation, diabetes 2, muscle wasting, gastrostomy, dependent on renal dialysis, pressure ulcers and tracheostomy. According to Resident #81 (R81)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R81 scored 12 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R81 is dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 02/01/2015 |
| CODY HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 02/01/2015 |
| B&Y TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 02/01/2015 |
| CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 02/01/2015 |
| NORCROSS, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2015 |
| ROGERS, STACEY | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2015 |
| KIRK, KRISTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/01/2016 |
| FLASHNER, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2015 |
| PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2015 |
| GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2015 |
| PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235226. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.