No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Medilodge of East Lansing

1843 N Hagadorn Road, East Lansing, MI 48823 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (517) 332-5061 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (517) 332-5061 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3050 E Lake Lansing Rd · (517) 332-1011 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3340 E Lake Lansing Rd Ste 1 · (517) 580-4216 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1511 Dennison Rd
Park
6166 Pollard Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2960 E Lake Lansing Rd · (616) 828-7631

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.6%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.3%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.9%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.6%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.0%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.9%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.3%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.3%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.7%11.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.151.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.081.641.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.5%CMS range 20.9–52.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.1–18.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.4%CMS range 6.3–16.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.361.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.74
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.36
RN hoursweekends
46.2%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 72.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.31 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.89 to 1.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intact 2655825Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent significant weight loss in two residents (#12, #16) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. Findings Included: Resident #12 (R12)Review of the medical record revealed R12 was admitted to the facility 05/24/2024 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, Angelman Syndrome (rare genetic disorder affecting the nervous system), gastrostomy, spastic quadriplegic (paralysis affecting both arms and both legs) cerebral palsy (brain damage during development), convulsion, dependence on respiratory ventilator, hypokalemia (low potassium), hypotension, esophagitis (inflammation esophagus), obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in urinary tract), pain, anxiety, anemia (low red blood cells) , and tracheostomy. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/31/2025, revealed R12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that could not be assessed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-12-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intact 2655825Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for the administration of tube feeding solution for one resident (#12) out of three residents reviewed resulting in the harm of significant weight loss. Findings Included: Resident #12 (R12)Review of the medical record revealed R12 was admitted to the facility 05/24/2024 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, Angelman Syndrome (rare genetic disorder affecting the nervous system), gastrostomy, spastic quadriplegic (paralysis affecting both arms and both legs) cerebral palsy (brain damage during development), convulsion, dependence on respiratory ventilator, hypokalemia (low potassium), hypotension, esophagitis (inflammation esophagus), obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in urinary tract), pain, anxiety, anemia (low red blood cells) , and tracheostomy. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/31/2025, revealed R12 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number MI00151442 and MI00151852 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide for three out of three residents (Resident #105, #106, #111) care and services to prevent and promote healing of pressure ulcers resulting in worsening wounds, osteomyelitis, and hospitalization. Findings Included: Review of the facility Matrix, dated 4/8/25, the facility census was 69 and they had nine current residents with pressure ulcers and three had facility acquired pressure wounds. Review of two complaints received by the State Agency alleged the facility failed to prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for R105 and R106, who was known high risk for skin breakdown. Resident #106(R106) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R106 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with re-admission 3/13/25 related to wound infection with other diagnoses that included traumatic brain dysfunction, cerebral vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively maintain the physical plant effecting 69 residents resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage.Findings include:On 01/07/2026 at 3:44 P.M., The restroom commode drain, located in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed partially obstructed. The commode basin water level was also observed slowly receding and refilling upon flushing. An interview was conducted with Resident #39 regarding the slow flushing restroom commode. Resident #39 stated: The toilet has been clogging since I arrived last August. Resident #39 also stated: Maintenance has been here, but the toilet continues to clog. On 01/07/2026 at 3:52 P.M., The restroom commode seat, located in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed severely loose-to-mount. The commode seat could be moved from side-to-side approximately 12-18 inches. An interview was conducted with Resident #82 regarding the loose commode seat. Resident #82…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for antidepressant medication use for one (R11) of five reviewed.Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected R11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen level), depression and bipolar disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/3/25, reflected R11 scored 12 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and received antidepressant medication. According to the medical record, R11 had a Guardian in place. R11's Physician's Orders reflected Trazodone (antidepressant medication) was ordered to start on 6/30/25. The medical record did not reflect that R11's Guardian had provided consent for Trazodone use, nor that they had been informed of the medication risks and/or benefits. In an interview on 01/09/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of advance directives for one (R13) of two reviewed.Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected R13 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer's. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], reflected R13 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and had long-term and short-term memory impairments. R13's medical record reflected a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR-no cardiopulmonary resuscitation/CPR) form was signed by a Representative (on the Patient Advocate line), the Physician and two witnesses on [DATE]. A Physician's Order, with a revision date of [DATE], reflected Full Resuscitate (CPR to be initiated in the event of cardiac and/or respiratory arrest). On [DATE] at 2:57 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) D reported that a resident's code status could be viewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #35) out of three residents was up able to regularly attend activities.Findings Included:Per the facility's face sheet Resident #35 (R35) was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included history of traumatic brain injury and persistent vegetative state. Review of a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 11/10/2025, revealed R35's BIMS score was zero out of 15 which indicated R35 had no cognitive ability to respond to stimuli or voice his needs.In an observation on 1/07/2026 at 3:34 PM, R35 was observed in bed, but was never observed today to be out of bed and sitting in the Broda chair that was observed in R35's room. The Broda chair was observed to have several wedges and blankets laying on the seat.In an observation on 1/08/2026 at 8:39 AM, R35 remained in bed. The Broda chair remained unchanged from previous day with wedges and blankets laying in the seat. No music, no TV, no entertainment was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently and timely address Monthly Medication Regimen Review recommendations for one (R37) of five reviewed. On 1/7/26 at 9:04 AM, R37 was observed sitting up in his bed with clear speech. He reported needing a swallow study and being thirsty.A review of the clinical record revealed R37 was admitted into the facility on 8/2/2025 with the most recent re-admission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: tracheostomy, anxiety, and need for assistance with personal care. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R37 scored 13/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated intact cognition).A review of R37's physician orders for his diet revealed an NPO order (nothing by mouth) dated 10/21/2025 through current.A review of R37's pharmacy progress notes revealed pharmacy made recommendations for July 2025, August 2025, October 2025, December 2025 and January 2026. A request was made for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R9) of three reviewed was able to understand and consent to the binding arbitration agreement.Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) due to thrombosis (blood clot) of other precerebral artery (8/26/26), persistent vegetative state (8/26/25) and tracheostomy status (surgical hole through the neck and into the windpipe). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/2/25, reflected R9 was coded as being in a persistent vegetative state/no discernible consciousness. The Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 12/3/25, reflected R9 was coded as being in a persistent vegetative state/no discernible consciousness. An Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement reflected R9's first and last initials were written with notation that R9 verbally consented to the Agreement on 11/19/25. The Agreement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake #2627443, 2634124, 2642694, 2662031, 2668275. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and call lights were responded to in a timely manner for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2, Resident #4 and Resident #7). Resident #4 (R4): Review of the medical record revealed R4 was admitted to the facility 10/28/29 with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, chronic respiratory failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (nerve damage of the bladder), sever protein calorie malnutrition, tracheostomy, colostomy, iron deficiency, stage 3 pressure ulcer, asthma, and insomnia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/27/2025, revealed R4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. R4 was discharged to the hospital 11/30/2025 R4 was unable to be interviewed as he was admitted to the hospital. According to his complaint intake, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains To Intake # 2631073, 2666145, 2655825, 2666019 and 267649Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers/bathing on a routine basis to maintain cleanliness and hygiene for 2 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #12) of four reviewed.Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) According to the medical record, including The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R2 was [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart disease, bipolar and schizoaffective disorder. R2 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview Status for Mental (BIMS). On 12/01/2025 at 12:42 am, During an interview with R2 she reported she has not had a shower since 11/20/25. R2 stated this was not uncommon and despite multiple complaints made to nursing management the issue is ongoing. Review of R2's Shower records for November 2025 revealed R2 received a total of 3 showers for the entire month of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake #'s 2677649 and 2666019.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and treat constipation for two of three residents reviewed (Resident #12 and # 15) resulting in hospitalization for Resident #12.Findings include:Resident #15 (R15) Review of the medical record revealed R15 was admitted to the facility 02/07/2025 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tracheostomy, type 2 diabetes, obesity, ventilator dependence, congestive heart failure (CHF), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypoglycemia (low blood sugar, bilateral hearing loss, obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage that hinders urine flow), and stage 3 kidney disease. R15's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/16/2025, revealed R15 did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) completed during the MDS look back period. Review of R15's medical record revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medication, medications observed in hall unattended, for one resident (#18) out of a facility census of 68 residents. Findings Included:Resident #18 (R18)Review of the medical record revealed R18 was admitted to the facility 07/22/2024 with diagnoses that included stroke, hypertension, chronic pain, bradycardia, bilateral hearing loss, dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder, prostate cancer, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, constipation, and restless leg syndrome. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/24/25, revealed R18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment) out of 15. During the initial tour of the facility on 12/01/2025 at 09:14 a.m. a medication cup, with medication, was observed sitting on top of an isolation care outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. No staff were in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2597662.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's orders for one (R1) of three reviewed.Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, asthma, tracheostomy status (surgical hole made through the front of the neck, into the windpipe/trachea, for placement of a tracheostomy tube for breathing) and spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/31/25, reflected R1 did not speak, was rarely/never understood and rarely/never understands.On 8/26/25 at 8:05 AM, R1 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in their room. A tracheostomy was observed, secured with tracheostomy ties. R1's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], reflected discharge diagnoses that included tracheostomy dependence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2597662.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care according to physician's orders for one (R1) of three reviewed.Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, asthma, tracheostomy status (surgical hole made through the front of the neck, into the windpipe/trachea, for placement of a tracheostomy tube for breathing) and spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/31/25, reflected R1 did not speak, was rarely/never understood and rarely/never understands.On 8/26/25 at 10:51 AM, R1 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in their room. A tracheostomy was observed, secured with tracheostomy ties. A cough assist machine was observed on a table in R1's room. In an interview on 8/26/25 at 11:01 AM, Respiratory Therapist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00151358, MI00150638 and MI00151852. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), including bathing/showering for four dependent resident (R103, R104, R106, and R110) reviewed of ADL care, resulting in increased worsening of pressure wounds and likelihood of feelings of worthlessness, disrespect and the potential for infection. Findings include: Review of three complaints received by the State Agency alleged the facility failed to assist and/or provide residents with ADL care including showering, oral care and grooming. Resident #106(R106) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R106 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with re-admission 3/13/25 related to wound infection with other diagnoses that included traumatic brain dysfunction, cerebral vascular accident, acute respiratory failure with anoxic brain damage with tracheostomy, contracture of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: MI00151418, MI00151694, MI00151358, MI00150699, MI00150638, MI00151442, and MI00151852. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient levels of nursing staff to meet resident needs and supervision for seven residents (Resident R102, R103, R104, R105, R106, R110 and R111) and per resident council with the potential for unmet care needs and facility residents to not attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Finding include: During an interview on 4/8/25 at 10:55 a.m., admission Staff N reported facility census was 69 and Director of Nursing B and Nursing Home Administrator A were not currently in the facility. Review of seven complaints received by the State Agency alleged the facility failed to maintain sufficient staff levels to meet resident needs including prevent worsening of pressure ulcers and prevent avoidable fall with injury. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation refers to intake MI00151694 and MI00150699. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for resident with known high risk for falls and implement care planned interventions to prevent fall injuries for 1 residents (R102) out of 3 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in R102 fall with injury requiring emergency room treatment and hospital admission. Findings included: Resident #102(R102) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R102 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included left hip fracture post fall at home, current post care for left hip surgical revision post fall with fracture and infection requiring intravenous antibiotics via central line catheter, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, and anemia. The MDS reflected R102 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 12 which indicated his ability to make daily decisions was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number MI00149947 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for one out of seven residents (Resident #7) a comprehensive care plan, including revisions, were in place for prevention and promotion of pressure ulcer healing. Findings Included: Per Resident #7's (R7) electronic medical record (EMR) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included right and left knee contractures. In an observation, and attempt to interview, on 2/27/2025 at 9:46 AM, R7 was observed in bed. R7 was observed to have contractures to both arms, both hands and fingers, neck, and was not able to communicate. R7's feet/heels were observed to be lying on the mattress with nothing in between R7's feet/heels and the mattress in order to offload the pressure from the mattress. Offloading boots (boots with air in them that prevents heels from touching the bed mattress and relieves pressure of the heels) were noted to be on the floor in front of R7's closet. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number MI00149947. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide for one out of three residents (Resident #7) care and services to prevent and promote healing of pressure ulcers resulting in worsening wounds. Findings Included: Per Resident #7's (R7) electronic medical record (EMR) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included right and left knee contractures. In an observation, and attempt to interview, on 2/27/2025 at 9:46 AM, R7 was observed in bed. R7 was observed to have contractures to both arms, both hands and fingers, neck, and was not able to communicate. R7's feet/heels were observed to be lying on the mattress with nothing in between R7's feet/heels and the mattress in order to offload the pressure from the mattress. Offloading boots (boots with air in them that prevents heels from touching the bed mattress and relieves pressure of the heels) were noted to be on the floor in front of R7's closet. An approximately 5 x…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI000148211. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control surveillance was monitored, mapped and documented monthly to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for all 62 residents who resided at the facility. Findings Included: On 12/17/2024 via email to Administrator A a request was sent to provide the facility's August through December 2024 Infection Control line listing with the color coded maps of each unit. Upon receiving the requested infection control documents on 12/17/2024, it was revealed that only August, September, and October 2024 line listings (residents listed that have an infection, what the organism is, and the antibiotic if applicable) were received. Also the only map that was received was for the month of September 2024. In an interview on 12/17/2024 at 2:15 PM, Administrator A was asked to provide the line listing and mapping for November 2024 infection control surveillance. Administrator A stated that no nurse had been performing the duties of the infection control program since November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number MI00148475. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident 2) had a person-centered baseline care plan developed, and implemented with appropriate interventions and revisions as needed. Finding Included: Review of Resident #2's (R2) face sheet it was revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a 10 day respite with expected discharge on [DATE]. R2 no longer resided at the facility at the time of the onsite survey. Review of R2's admission fall risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed as question to be answered Yes or No if R2 had displayed any of the following behaviors: was a high risk for falls. R2 was easily distracted, had periods of altered perception or or awareness of surroundings,episode of disorganized speech, restlessness, lethargy, mental function varies throughout the course of the day, wanders, abusive and resists care. The question was answered Yes. The assessment revealed R2 had Clinical Condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three (Resident #36, #59, and #68) of 17 reviewed. Findings include: Resident #36 (R36) Review of the medical record revealed R36 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus. The MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 7/21/24 revealed R36 received insulin injections seven days out of the seven day look back period. Review of R36's medical record revealed they did not receive insulin during the look back period. In a telephone interview on 10/28/24 at 2:15 PM, Regional Director of Assessment Coordination F agreed R36 did not receive insulin during the look back period and reported the MDS was coded incorrectly. Resident #59 (R59) Review of the medical record reflected R59 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, cerebrovascular disease and gastrostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for 3 (Resident #4, 22 and 28) of 17 reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #22 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #22 (R22) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. On 10/27/24 at 11:48 AM, R22 was observed in bed, sleeping. R22's lunch was on his bedside table and appeared untouched. R22's plate consisted of a small scoop of ground pork, a scoop of mashed potatoes and gravy, and a scoop of diced squash. R22 appeared to be underweight. Review of a Physician Order dated 10/27/23 revealed a diet order stating Diet: regular diet, mechanical soft texture, thin liquids/double entree . Review of a Dietary Progress Note dated 6/19/2024 revealed R22 was struggling with weight loss and had an ordered diet of mechanical soft (ground) texture, thin liquids/double…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely collection of an ordered urinalysis (urine test) for one (Resident #60) of two reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #60 (R60) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/20/24, reflected R60 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 10/27/24 at 11:39 AM, R60 was observed seated in a recliner, in her room. She stated the prior Monday (10/21/24), she reported cloudy urine and burning with urination. R60 reported she had blood drawn on 10/25/24 but had not had a urine sample collected. A Nurse Practitioner Progress Note for 10/23/24 reflected R60 was seen for painful urination, right flank (lower back) pain and reports of milky urine. The note reflected a urinalysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to promote pressure ulcer healing and prevent the worsening of pressure ulcers for one resident (R4) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the potential for delayed wound healing and/or the worsening of wounds. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R4 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recent readmission [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, schizophrenia, cardiac disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), kidney disease, stage 4 pressure ulcer, anxiety and depression. The MDS reflected R4 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 15 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact, and she required supervision or touch assistance with bed mobility, transfers and partial/moderate assist with dressing, bathing and toileting. During an observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen for one resident (R4) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R4 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recent readmission [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure, dementia, schizophrenia, cardiac disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), kidney disease, stage 4 pressure ulcer, anxiety and depression. The MDS reflected R4 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 15 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact, and she required supervision or touch assistance with bed mobility, transfers and partial/moderate assist with dressing, bathing and toileting. During an observation and interview on 10/27/24 at 10:01 AM, R4 was sitting upright in bed, dressed in a hospital gown and appeared able to answer questions without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake MI00145607 Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff for one (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that R3 had an original admission date of 2/20/24 and a last admission date of 6/20/24. R3 was last discharged for hospital care on 7/20/24 and was not in the facility during survey. R3 had the following pertinent diagnoses: Cerebral infarction, unspecified (a condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or reduced), Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder. Reveiw of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 2/26/24 documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS revealed R3 was able to make self understood and was able to understand others with clear comprehension. Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) disclosed documentation on 6/21/24 of a staff Registered Nurse, (RN) C to resident (R3) abuse. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00145078. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in treatment orders when one resident (Resident #3) did not transfer to the emergency room (ER) for bleeding, as ordered. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #3 (R3) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure, tracheostomy status and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/8/24, reflected R3 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). According to the medical record, R3 was his own responsible party. R3 was transferred to the hospital on 6/9/24 and did not reside in the facility at the time of the survey. According to R3's medical record, his most recent weight was 768.4 pounds on 5/18/24. A Situation, Background,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00145078. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to routinely assess and monitor a change in condition for one (Resident #3). Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #3 (R3) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure, tracheostomy status and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/8/24, reflected R3 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). According to the medical record, R3 was his own responsible party. R3 was transferred to the hospital on 6/9/24 and did not reside in the facility at the time of the survey. According to R3's medical record, his most recent weight was 768.4 pounds on 5/18/24. A Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) document, dated 6/8/24 at 9:20 AM reflected the nurse suspected R3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00144740 and MI00145260. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate orders to treat pressure ulcers for one (Resident #2) of four reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #2 (R2) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest and anoxic brain damage. R2 did not reside in the facility at the time of the survey. R2's medical record reflected a facility-acquired pressure ulcer to the sacrum that was unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss where the extent of tissue damage in the ulcer cannot be confirmed due to the wound bed being obscured by slough (non-viable tissue that can present as yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) or eschar (dead or devitalized tissue that can present as black, brown, tan or scab-like)). On 6/4/24, R2's sacral pressure ulcer measured 0.47 centimeters (cm) in length by 0.8 cm in width, with a wound bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00143527 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a medical device related pressure ulcer for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in the development of a facility acquired deep tissue injury (DTI-intact or non-intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration or epidermal separation revealing a dark wound bed or blood filled blister) with the potential for delayed wound healing and/or worsening pressure ulcer. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #1 (R1) was readmitted to the facility 3/27/24 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, tracheostomy status, cognitive communication deficit, and retention of urine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/2/24 revealed that R1 was rarely/never understood with a staff assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Level II Screening for Mental Illness/Intellectual/Developmental Disability/Related Condition Exemption Criteria Certification or refer to Community Mental Health for an OBRA Level II evaluation for one (Resident #60) of one reviewed for Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR), resulting in the potential for lack of appropriate mental health treatment and services. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #60 (R60) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, altered mental status and unspecified dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/30/23, reflected R60 scored one out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), did not walk and required extensive to total assistance of one to two or more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement nutrition interventions for one (Resident #54) of three reviewed, resulting in the potential for further weight loss. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #54 (R54) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, mood disorder, and dysphagia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/13/23 revealed R54 scored 8 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and needed set up help for eating. Review of the weight history revealed on 6/7/23, R54 weighed 127 pounds and on 9/4/23, R54 weighed 107.8 pounds. R54 sustained a 15.11% weight loss in three months. Review of R54's [NAME] (care guide) revealed interventions that included one to one assistance with meals and drinks with straws. On 09/25/23 at 09:00 AM, R54 was observed in bed with the head…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor pharmacy recommendations upon readmission from the hospital for three (Resident #16, #20 and #36) of five reviewed for pharmacy medication regimen reviews, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications, medication interactions and adverse reactions. Findings include: Resident #36 (R36): Review of the medical record reflected R36 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, delusional disorders, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/28/23, reflected R36 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), did not walk and required total assistance of one to two or more people for activities of daily living. On 09/27/23 at 1:20 PM, R36 was observed lying in bed, with the head of the bed elevated. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to justify the continued PRN (as needed) use and/or provide a duration of use of a psychotropic medication for two (Resident #16 and Resident #36) of five reviewed, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and adverse reactions. Findings include: Resident #16(R16) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R16 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), respiratory failure with use of ventilator, heart failure, diabetes, kidney failure, anxiety, psychotic disorder, and depression. The MDS reflected R16 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 15 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact, and she required two person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and one person physical assist with locomotion on unit, dressing, hygiene, and bathing. Continued review of R16 MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #25) was prepared for a CT scan out of one reviewed, resulting in delayed services and frustration and anger. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R25 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/15/23 revealed R25 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 09/25/23 at 10:01 AM, R25 was observed in bed after being transported back to the facility via stretcher. R25 reported she was very angry and frustrated because she was supposed to have a CT scan performed that morning, but it was cancelled because the facility did not pre-medicate her due to her allergy to the contrast. R25 reported this was the second time her CT scan was cancelled for this reason. R25 reported she is not sure if the facility knew she needed pre-medication for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform acceptable infection control standard while performing suprapubic catheter care for one resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for suprapubic catheter care resulting in the potential to spread infection to other staff and residents. Findings Included: Resident #36 (R36) Review of the medical record revealed R36 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis of all 4 limbs), chronic respiratory failure, autonomic dysreflexia (overreaction of involuntary nervous system to stimulation) , neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, tracheostomy, colostomy, hyperlipemia (high fat in blood), hypokalemia (low potassium), constipation, diarrhea, delusion disorder, venous insufficiency, sleep apnea, muscle spasm, nicotine dependency, anxiety, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), insomnia, depression, gastro-esophageal reflux, chronic pain, and anemia (low red blood cells). The most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-09 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Medilodge of FarmingtonFarmington, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand BlancGrand Blanc, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of HowellHowell, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MarshallMarshall, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Montrose IncMontrose, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MunisingMunising, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Sault Ste. MarieSault Ste. Marie, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of SouthfieldSouthfield, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of WestwoodKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge at the ShoreGrand Haven, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Capital AreaLansing, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of CheboyganCheboygan, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of FrankenmuthFrankenmuth, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of GTCTraverse City, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of KalamazooKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of LudingtonLudington, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of St. ClairEast China, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Sterling HeightsSterling Heights, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Campus AreaEast Lansing, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of HillmanHillman, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivingstonHowell, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivoniaLivonia, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Mt. PleasantMt. Pleasant, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of PortagePortage, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ShorelineSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Tawas CityTawas City, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of TaylorTaylor, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ZeelandZeeland, MI 3 of 5The Lodge at TaylorTaylor, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of GaylordGaylord, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of HollandHolland, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LansingLansing, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LeelanauSuttons Bay, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of MilfordMilford, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of OkemosOkemos, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of RichmondRichmond, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of Traverse CityTraverse City, MI 5 of 5Medilodge of AlpenaAlpena, MI

Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CANARY OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2016
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2016
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2016
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2016
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2016
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/02/2016
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/02/2016
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/02/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/02/2016
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/02/2016
CENTURY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2016
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 5%Other / private 34%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$471per resident / day
operating cost
$14,322per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$416per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235283. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next