Medilodge of Campus Area
2815 Northwind Drive, East Lansing, MI 48823 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (517) 332-0817 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- about 32% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.1% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.5% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.3% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.9% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.5% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.4% | 14.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 66.7% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.4% | 24.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.6% | 11.7% | 12.0% | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.5%CMS range 26.7–59.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.5–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 73.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI000151964. Based on interview and record review, the facility 1) failed to assess and monitor and 2) follow physician orders for one (Resident #500) of three reviewed for quality of care, resulting in a delay in recognition and response to a significant change in condition which progressed to a cardiac arrest and subsequent poor outcome, including CPR, hospitalization, and ultimately comfort care status. Resident #500 (R500) A review of the medical record reflected that R500 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypotension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] indicated that R500 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a cognitive screening tool. R500 no longer resided in the facility. On [DATE] at 12:01 AM, Resident #430 (R430) was observed seated on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the code status was accurate and reflective of the resident's wishes for one (R7) of two reviewed.Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, legal blindness and presence of an artificial eye. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), had impaired vision without corrective lenses and no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous). According to the medical record, R7 was her own responsible party. On [DATE] at 2:52 PM, R7 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in her room. R7's medical record included a document titled, Advanced Directives Acknowledgements / CPR Consent, which was marked for, No Resuscitation: In the event of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a care conference after admission for one (R7) of two reviewed.Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, legal blindness and presence of an artificial eye. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/17/26, reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), had impaired vision without corrective lenses and no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous). According to the medical record, R7 was her own responsible party. R7's medical record reflected a prior admission on [DATE] and discharge home on 1/30/26. R7's MDS history included a discharge return not anticipated MDS, with an ARD of 1/30/26. On 04/28/2026 at 2:52 PM, R7 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in her room. R7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2989711.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1) identify and treat a new wound for one (R70) and 2) treat earwax buildup for one (R58) of 17 reviewed.Findings include: Resident #70 (R70) Review of the medical records reflected that R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] following hospitalization. Diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Peripheral Vascular Disease, left side weakness from previous stroke and a new diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis- right ankle and foot. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/12/2025 revealed R70 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (Cognitively Intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R70 was independent to minimal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting. R70 is able to make his needs known. During an interview on 04/28/2026 at 2:39 PM, R70…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain vision services for one (R7) of two reviewed.Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, legal blindness and presence of an artificial eye. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/17/26, reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), had impaired vision without corrective lenses and no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous). According to the medical record, R7 was her own responsible party. On 04/28/2026 at 2:55 PM, R7 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in her room. R7 stated about one month prior, she had asked to be put on the dental and vision services lists. R7 reported her left eye was a prosthetic, and she had 20 percent vision in her right eye. R7 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label medications in one of two medication carts reviewed.Findings include:On 4/30/2026 at 2:16 PM, an observation was made of the 200-hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) R. The top drawer was found to contain a vial of Novolog insulin for R27. The vial was observed to have been open and was stored inside a prescription bottle, neither the prescription bottle it was stored in or the vial itself were labeled with an open date or expiration date (based on the open date). LPN R reported the expectation is insulin should be labeled with an open date upon being opened and should be considered expired 30 days after being opened. LPN R reported the vial would need to be disposed up since there was not a way to determine when it was opened/when it expired.On 4/30/2026 at 2:42 PM, during an interview with Director of Nursing (DON), it was reported that the expectation for labeling insulin is that each one is labeled with an open date and each medication cart has a list of medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain dental services for two (R7 and R58) of two reviewed.Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, legal blindness and presence of an artificial eye. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/17/26, reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), had impaired vision without corrective lenses and no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous). According to the medical record, R7 was her own responsible party. R7's payor source was listed as Medicaid, effective 3/13/26. On 04/28/2026 at 2:55 PM, R7 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in her room. R7 stated about one month prior, she had asked to be put on the dental and vision services lists. R7 reported having only one tooth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy entitled QAPI Plan with a date of implementation of 10/24/22 demonstrated in the purpose statement, It is the policy of this facility to systemically collect date as part of the QAPI program to ensure the care and services it delivers meet acceptable standard of quality in accordance with recognized standard of practice. Key components, listed in the policy, include: 1. Tracking and measuring performance 2. Establishing goals and thresholds for performance improvements 3. Identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies 4. Systematically analyzing underlying causes of system quality deficiencies. 5. Developing and implementing corrective action or performance improvement activities. 6. Monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of corrective action/performance improvement activities and revising as need. In an interview on 03/03/2025 at 03:55 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00146912, MI00150426 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant for resident rooms 200, 211,214, 301,303, 400 and maintain a homelike environment regarding noise and phone usage for Resident #318 and Resident Council. Findings Included: On 02/25/2026 at 08:50 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom the laminate that covered the counter of the sink appeared to be coming off the countertop. Gripper strips only the right side of the bed for 200-1 were observed to be torn and coming off the floor. On 02/25/2025 at 09:13 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 was observed to have a hole in the closet door. On 02/25/2025 at 10:19 a.m. observed room [ROOM NUMBER] to be unclean. Dust balls were observed on the floor. Review of the bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 402 sink counter was observed to lose on the wall and able to be moved up and down with ease. [NAME] caulk on sink counter was cracked and not present the entire…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
On 02/25/25 09:11 AM, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) W reported that today she was assigned 13 residents, will at times have 16 residents which was very difficult but impossible to complete all the assigned tasks in caring for that many residents. During an interview with CNA X on 02/25/25 at 09:37 AM, it was reported 13 residents were assigned today. CNA X elaborated on many occasions closer to 20 residents have been assigned, and it was not possible to provide the care needed for 20 residents. On 02/27/25 at 10:26 AM, CNA's E and K reported they normally have 12 or 13 residents assigned to care for but the facility experiences a lot of staff that call in sick and when this happens they will have 20 residents assigned to them and this was not doable. When queried if the Nurses help them answer call lights, toilet residents etc both CNA E and CNA K stated it depended on what nurse was working. On 03/03/25 at 10:59 AM, during the Resident Council (RC) meeting 4 of 5 participants reported the facility was routinely short staffed and call light response time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00149724, MI00150426 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain preferred food temperature and acceptable palatability for three residents (R11, R41, and R318) out of ten residents reviewed for food palatability and food preferred temperatures. Findings Included: Resident #41 (R41) Review of the medical record revealed R41 was admitted to the facility 10/27/2021 with diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), alcoholic liver disease, emphysema (chronic lung disease that permanently damages the lungs making his difficulty to breath), anemia (low red blood cells), alcoholic fatty liver, polyneuropathy (a peripheral nerve disorder that causes multiple nerves throughout the body to malfunction simultaneously), hypertension, hypotension, hyperlipidemia (high fat content), acquired absence of right leg above the knee, acquired absence of left leg above the knee, muscle spasm, chronic pain, anxiety, nicotine dependence, alcohol abuse, and dementia. The most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to MI00146912 and MI00150426 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to preserve the dignity of 3 of 4 residents (Resident #2, #318, #32) reviewed for dignity and 4 of 5 residents for residents that attended the confidential group meeting. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident # 2 (R2) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 1/04/25 with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R2 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview Status (BIMS). On 02/25/25 at 09:58 AM during an interview with R2 it was reported that staff complain chronically about their work load and are continuously talking and complaining about Resident 32 (R32) and how frequently R32 pushes the call light for help. R2 elaborated that staff were observed frequently texting or talking on their personal cell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that grievances were promptly documented, investigated, tracked and resolved for 5 of 5 residents that participated in the Resident Council (RC) meeting and Resident #2. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council (RC) minutes dated 9/17/24 reflected concerns with staff not wearing name tags, delayed call light response times, noise levels. RC Minutes dated 10/22/24 reflected the Nursing Home Administrator on record (NHA) A attended the meeting and reported inservices were done with staff in relation to concerns brought forth from the 9/17/24 meeting. Residents reported noise level at night continued to be a problem. RC minutes dated 11/26/24 reflected concern related to staff being on their phones in common areas and at the nurses station. RC minutes dated 12/27/24 reflected the concern with staff being on their personal phones continues, call light response time was an issue and staff being loud at night/noise level was a concern. RC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) were provided to two (R323 and R325) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification, resulting in the potential for residents and/or representatives to be uninformed of the potential private pay charges of continued services at the facility and inability to file an appeal. Findings include: On 3/3/25 at 12:10 PM, Self-identified Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) B was asked to provide beneficiary notification information including NOMNC and/or SNF-ABN for three residents. A review of the documents provided revealed R323 was missing a SNF-ABN and the NOMNC for R325 was missing the second page, which is where the resident/resident representative would sign, acknowledging receipt and understanding. On 3/3/25 at 3:17 PM, during an interview with social services director (SSD) N, when asked when a resident should receive a SNF-ABN she reported that she gives one for every NOMNC issued. When asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00150426 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately record and make a prompt effort to resolve grievances for one resident (#318) of one resident reviewed for grievances. Findings Included: Resident #318 (R318) Review of the medical record revealed R318 was admitted to the facility 02/13/2025 with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease (build-up of fats, cholesterol and other substances in the artery walls), bilateral peripheral vertigo (dizziness caused by problem in inner ear), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), hypertension, anemia (low red blood cells), and Barrett's esophagus (damage to the lower part of the esophagus). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 02/18/2025, revealed R318 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During observation and interview on 02/25/2025 at 10:09 a.m. R318 was observed sitting on the side of his bed. R318 explained that he had concerns that he had not received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one resident (#6) of 16 residents reviewed for accurate assessments. Findings Included: Resident #6 (R6) Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility 10/17/2019 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), atherosclerotic heart disease (build-up of fats, cholesterol and other substances in the artery walls), chronic respiratory failure, depression, anxiety, urinary incontinence, lack of coordination, nausea, dysuria (discomfort, pain, or burning when urinating), muscle spasm, metabolic encephalopathy (impaired brain function), thrombocytopenia (low number of platelets), low back pain, generalized edema (excess fluid buildup in the body's tissues), chronic pain, psychotic disorder (mental disorder characterized by a disconnection form reality), developmental disorder of speech and language, obesity, hypertension, absence of left leg above the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the local state mental health authority of Pre-admission Screening (PAS)/Annual Resident Review (ARR) (PASARR) changes for one (Resident #33) of two reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected Resident 33 (R33) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, developmental disorder of scholastic skills, and bipolar disorder. Review of R33's clinical record reflected R33 scored 12 out of 14 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS). Review of R33's level one screening/3877 dated 12/28/23 reflected R33 had a mental illness and was learning disabled, the level II screen dated 12/29/23 reflected that R 33 was on a 30 day exemption and expected to be discharged from the facility within 30 days. The next 3877 was dated 9/12/24 and reflected R33 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, developmental disorder of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for one resident (#32) of 16 reviewed. Findings Included: Resident #32 (R32) Review of the medical record revealed R32 was admitted to the facility 04/18/2019 with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, paraplegia (paralysis that occurs in the lower half of the body), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, type 2 diabetes, obesity, diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes), cardiomegaly (enlarge heart), muscle spasm, anemia (low red blood cells), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, altered mental status, metabolic encephalopathy (impaired brain function), insomnia, edema, anxiety, major depression, migraine, and gastro-esophageal reflux. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 0f 10/12/2024, revealed R32 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to include one resident (R#29) in care plan development of 16 residents reviewed for participation in care planning. Findings include: Resident #29 (R29) Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident 29 (R29) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mild cognitive impairment, schizophrenia and seizure disorder. R29 scored 10 out of 15 (mild cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 02/25/25 at 09:04 AM, R29 was observed sitting in her room and was observed to have sad facial expressions. When queried about her mood R 29 reported she did not like living at the facility and wanted to be discharged back to the community. R29 elaborated that she was admitted to the facility last spring or summer and was discharged to an adult foster care in August 2024 with in home services from the community. R29 reported during her initial stay she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00150426 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for three residents (R11-brace application, R41-prosthetic fitting appointment, and R318-medication administration time) of sixteen residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings Included: Resident #41 (R41) Review of the medical record revealed R41 was admitted to the facility 10/27/2021 with diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), alcoholic liver disease, emphysema (chronic lung disease that permanently damages the lungs making his difficulty to breath), anemia (low red blood cells), alcoholic fatty liver, polyneuropathy (a peripheral nerve disorder that causes multiple nerves throughout the body to malfunction simultaneously), hypertension, hypotension, hyperlipidemia (high fat content), acquired absence of right leg above the knee, acquired absence of left leg above the knee, muscle spasm, chronic pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide diabetic foot care to one (R47) of one reviewed for foot care, resulting in long toenails and discomfort. Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R47 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and need for assistance with personal care, reduced mobility. Review of R47's physician orders revealed the following order entered on 12/12/24, May be seen by Ophthalmology, Podiatry, Audiologist, Psychiatrist, Psychologist, Optometrist, dentist, and wound care as needed or warranted. Review of R47's progress notes revealed no notes regarding podiatry services. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R47 had scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated intact cognition), required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. On 2/25/2025 at 3:52 PM, R47 was observed lying in his bed with his family member (family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake: MI00150426 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide medication in a timely manner for one resident (R318) out of four residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings Included: Resident #318 (R318) Review of the medical record revealed R318 was admitted to the facility 02/13/2025 with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease (build-up of fats, cholesterol and other substances in the artery walls), bilateral peripheral vertigo (dizziness caused by problem in inner ear), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), hypertension, anemia (low red blood cells), and Barrett's esophagus (damage to the lower part of the esophagus). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 02/18/2025, revealed R318 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During observation and interview on 02/25/2025 at 10:14 a.m. R318 was observed sitting on the side of his bed. R318 explained that he had not received his valium until several days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the medical record the rationale for no changes to the medication review for one (Resident #4) of five reviewed. Findings include: Resident #4 (R4) Review of the medical record revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia. Review of R4's Physician's Orders revealed a current orders for Atorvastatin Calcium 20 milligrams (mg). Review of the Medication Regimen Review dated 5/7/2024 revealed this resident is on hospice. please consider the long term benefit of the atorvastatin 20 mg therapy and discontinue at this time. The Physician/Prescriber response was marked as disagree and signed on 5/21/24. There was no documented rationale in R4s medical record as to why the recommendation was not implemented. only a hand written note at the bottom of the document which stated keep on statin. In an interview on 3/03/25 at 2:14 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #50 (R50) Review of the medical record revealed R50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure. Review of the Physician's Order dated 2/11/25 revealed an as needed order for Tylenol Oral Tablet 325 MG (Acetaminophen). Give 2 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for Elevated Temperature;Pain. Review of the Physician's Order dated 2/11/25 revealed an as needed order for Norco Oral Tablet 7.5-325 MG (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain. Review of these orders revealed no parameters for the maximum dose permitted for acetaminophen, and if given as ordered, would exceed the maximum dose of acetaminophen allowed. In an interview on 03/03/25 at 2:16 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) C agreed the ordered doses exceeded the prescribed parameter of 3000 mg. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#6), #50) of five reviewed were free from unnecessary medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was below 5% when two medication errors were observed from a total of 27 opportunities for one resident (R61) of three reviewed, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. Findings include: On 2/27/25 at 7:55 AM, registered nurse (RN) S was observed preparing and administering Spiriva inhaler (medication used to treat lung disease) 2.5 mcg and Advair discus (steroid inhaler used for lung disease) 250/50 mcg. Resident was handed and self-administered the Advair and immediately after was handed and self-administered the Spiriva. Upon exiting the room, RN S was asked if they would normally give any instructions related to the inhalers, they reported that they would normally have instructed the resident to wait 2 minutes in between each inhaler and that she had forgotten. On 2/27/25 at 4:48 PM, director of nursing (DON) C was asked what their expectation would be for specific instructions related to administration of both Spiriva and Advair inhalers. DON C reported that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 55 (R55) review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected R55 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) . On 02/25/25 at 08:36 AM, while entering R55's room alongside Social Service Director (SSD) N, R55 was observed in bed, there was a medication cup observed on R55's nightstand. The medication cup was observed to have 5 pills in the cup. R55 reported we woke her up at which time SSD N left the room. R#55 reported she was not woken up for breakfast or to take her medications. When queried if her medication were usually left at the bedside R55 reported yes sometimes. On 02/27/25 at 12:06 PM, during an interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) T reported there were no current residents in facility that were approved for self administration of medication. The observation that occurred on 2/25/25 at 8:36 am was shared ADON T who reported the expectation was that Nurses were to administer medications and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to address dental need for one resident (resident #2) of 3 reviewed for dental services. Findings include: Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident # 2 (R2) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 1/04/25 with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and morbid obesity. R2 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview Status (BIMS). On 02/25/25 at 10:11 AM during an interview, R2 was observed to have multiple teeth missing and the teeth that were present were observed to be discolored. R2 stated he had mouth pain and saw a dentist at the facility and extractions and dentures were discussed. R2 stated he wanted to have a 2nd opinion from his dentist in a neighboring town. R2 reported he discussed this with Social Services Director (SSD) N and was instructed R2 or his niece to make the appointment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation includes intake MI000150426 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide requested dietary items for three residents (R29, R60 and R319) of ten residents reviewed for food. Findings include: Resident #60 (R60) Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident 60 (R60) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: anxiety and depression. R60 scored 14 out of 15 (indicating intact cognition) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 2/25/2025 at 9:50 AM, during an interview with R60, he reported he often has requested double portions of certain foods and he rarely has been provided double portions or what is indicated on his meal ticket. On 3/03/25 at 11:48 AM, R60 was observed sitting up eating lunch, he reported his lunch was correct however his breakfast that morning was incorrect. He reported that he asked for two packets of brown sugar for his oatmeal and only received one (he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation includes intake MI000150119 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure tracking and trending of employee illness; 2) implement timely Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) for one COVID-19 positive resident (Resident #30) of one reviewed; and 3) ensure appropriate cleaning and storage of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) mask for one (Resident #319). Findings include: During review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program on 02/27/25 at 2:01 PM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) T reported there was a sheet for the charge nurse to write down the reason for employee call-ins, and the Scheduler kept the employee call-in forms. If they were seeing trends in call-ins, the data was entered into the infection watch system, with tracking that included which hall staff worked on and who they had cared for. If staff tested positive for COVID-19 or when noticing multiple staff calling in for the same thing, the data was entered into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent and/or declination for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations for one (Resident #18) of five reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #18 (R18) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. According to the medical record, R18 had a medical Power of Attorney in place. Review of the medical record reflected R18 had not received any immunizations in the facility. There were no immunization consents or declinations in the medical record. In an interview on 02/27/25 at 2:01 PM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) T reported influenza immunizations were offered yearly, and the facility began attempts to obtain consents and/or declinations around August. The facility provided a Progress Note dated 12/11/24, which reflected multiple messages had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer COVID-19 booster immunizations to three (Resident #6, #18 and #32) of five reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) Review of the medical record reflected R6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. According to the medical record, R6 had a Guardian in place. According to the medical record, R6 had last received a COVID-19 immunization on 12/2/23. The medical record did not reflect documentation that any further booster immunizations had been offered. Resident #18 (R18) Review of the medical record reflected R18 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. According to the medical record, R18 had a medical Power of Attorney in place. Review of the medical record reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake MI00143189 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for a decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #3 (R3) was initially admitted to facility 10/25/22 with diagnoses including Huntington's Disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/1/24 reflected that R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 7 (severe cognitive impairment). Review of R3's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care Plan reflected that R3 was independent with transfer, ambulation, bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting. Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 2/19/24 revealed, .On 2/8/24, [Certified Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake MI00143189 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely identify, investigate, and report a staff to resident allegation of abuse to the abuse coordinator (the Nursing Home Administrator), and failed to timely report the allegation to the State Agency for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in delayed identification, investigation, and reporting and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #3 (R3) was initially admitted to facility 10/25/22 with diagnoses including Huntington's Disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/1/24 reflected that R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 7 (severe cognitive impairment). Review of R3's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care Plan reflected that R3 was independent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00143099 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs, resulting in unmet care needs and the potential for a decline in emotional and physical health. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #2 (R2) readmitted to facility 4/25/23 with diagnoses including acquired absence of right leg above knee and left leg above knee, congestive heart failure, lack of coordination, muscle spasms, conversion disorder with seizures, mild cognitive impairment, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/14/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (cognitively intact). Section E of the same MDS revealed that R2 did not exhibit rejection of care. In an observation and interview on 4/30/24 at 10:19 AM, R2 was observed sitting in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for one resident (#463) of four residents reviewed resulting in the potential for decreased efficacy of anticonvulsant medication resulting in the potential of seizure activity. Findings Included: Resident #463 (R463) Review of the medical record revealed R463 was admitted to the facility 11/30/2023 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sever protein-calorie malnutrition, cerebral infarction (stroke), type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), atrial fibrillation, epilepsy (nerve activity in brain disturbed), gout (build-up of uric acid in bone joints), hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), anemia (low red blood cells), kidney failure, chronic pain, tracheostomy, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/06/2023, demonstrated that a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) could not be assessed. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines for glucometer cleaning and handling of medication for four residents (#15, #17, #38, #463) of four residents during medication administration observation resulting in the potential to spread infection and blood borne pathogens. Findings Included: Resident #15 (R15) Review of the medical record revealed R15 was admitted to the facility 7/09/2022 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, heart failure, hyperkalemia (high potassium), dementia, metabolic encephalopathy (brain disease), gastro-esophageal reflux, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), personality disorder, psychotic disorder, cerebral infarction (stroke), mood disorder, and depression. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/01/2023, demonstrated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. Resident #17 (R17) Review of the medical record revealed R17 was admitted to the facility 12/08/2022 with diagnoses that included chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three (Resident #25, #41, #53) of 15 reviewed, resulting in inaccurate assessments and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #25 (R25) Review of the medical record revealed R25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included retention of urine. The MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/9/23 revealed R25 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and had an indwelling urinary catheter. According to the medical record, R25 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 11/7/23. The Physician's Orders revealed R25's indwelling urinary catheter was discontinued on 10/30/23. On 12/11/23 at 10:33 AM, R25 was observed sitting on the edge of his bed. R25 did not have an indwelling catheter in place. Registered Nurse (RN) O entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for two residents (#18, #25) of 15 residents reviewed for planning of care resulting in the potential for unmet care needs or the potential for inadequate/inappropriate resident care. Findings Included: Resident #18 (R18) Review of the medical record revealed R18 was most recently admitted to the facility 10/26/2022 with diagnoses that included Huntington's Disease (nerve cells break down over time), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia (low red blood cells), adult failure to thrive, protein malnutrition, asthma, dementia, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), hypertension, polyneuropathy (damage to multiple peripheral nerves), insomnia, hyperkalemia (high potassium), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, anxiety, hyperlipidemia (high fats in blood), gastro-esophageal flux, and osteoarthritis (arthritis in end of bones form wear). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ensure appropriate treatment and services for contracture management for one resident (#18) of two residents reviewed resulting in the potential for the development and worsening of contractures and pain. Findings Included: Resident #18 (R18) Review of the medical record revealed R18 was most recently admitted to the facility 10/26/2022 with diagnoses that included Huntington's Disease (nerve cells break down over time), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia (low red blood cells), adult failure to thrive, protein malnutrition, asthma, dementia, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), hypertension, polyneuropathy (damage to multiple peripheral nerves), insomnia, hyperkalemia (high potassium), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, anxiety, hyperlipidemia (high fats in blood), gastro-esophageal flux, and osteoarthritis (arthritis in end of bones form wear). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/17/2023, demonstrated a Brief Interview of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement physician's orders and urology recommendations to attempt to restore continence for one (Resident #25) of one reviewed, resulting in the potential for continence status to not be restored to the extent possible. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 (R25) revealed R25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, and retention of urine. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/9/23 revealed R25 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the urology consult note dated 10/12/23 revealed instructions were to return in about one month (around 11/12/23) for a follow up trial of void versus discuss suprapubic catheter. The note also revealed to start Flomax (medication for urinary retention). Of note,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented review of pharmacy recommendations/follow up occurred for 1 resident (Resident #6) of 5 residents reviewed resulting in the potential for medication side effects and/or unnecessary medications for residents. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of congestive heart failure, depression, anxiety, and chronic pain. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 15 which indicated her cognition was intact (13-15 cognitively intact). Review of R6's Pharmacy Medication Review Progress Notes in the EMR dated 8/3/2023 revealed, Chart reviewed- 1 recommendation to MD, 1 to nursing. Review of R6's monthly pharmacy review dated 8/3/2023 note to attending physician/prescriber revealed the following recommendations: lipid panel, LFTS (Liver Function Tests), A1C (measures average blood sugar levels over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication rate was less than 5% when eleven mediation errors were observed from a total of 35 opportunities for one resident (#463) of four residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in a medication error rate of 31.43% and resulting potential for adverse reactions, and/or side effects, and/or decrease drug efficacy. Findings Included: Resident #463 (R463) Review of the medical record revealed R463 was admitted to the facility 11/30/2023 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sever protein-calorie malnutrition, cerebral infarction (stroke), type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), atrial fibrillation, epilepsy (nerve activity in brain disturbed), gout (build up of uric acid in bone joints), hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), anemia (low red blood cells), kidney failure, chronic pain, tracheostomy, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANARY OPCO GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2016 |
| B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2016 |
| B&Y TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2016 |
| CODY HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2016 |
| CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2016 |
| NORCROSS, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| ROGERS, STACEY | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| KIRK, KRISTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| FLASHNER, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| CENTURY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 32% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235517. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.