Medilodge of Livonia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 56% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 93.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00147554 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing monitoring and treatment for a change in condition for one resident (R901) of four residents reviewed for change of condition resulting in the initiation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Findings include: A review of Intake: MI00147554 revealed the following, Complainant states the resident was exhibiting an altered mental status and the nurse on duty called EMS (emergency medical services) to have the resident sent to the hospital. The complainant states EMS arrived at the residents bedside and the administrator made them leave and told the Nurse Practitioner to treat the resident in house. The complainant states the resident was found dead the next day. The complainant states they don't know the residents cause of death but appeared fine prior to showing signs of altered mental status. A review of R901's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were followed per the plan of care and prevent a fall from bed during incontinence care for two sampled residents (R41 and R64) from a sample of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in fall with head injury and a transfer to the hospital. Findings include: R41 On 10/30/23 at 10:12 AM, R41 was observed sitting in their wheelchair eating breakfast. R41 was observed to have a healed scar to the left side of their forehead. They were asked about their stay in the facility, and they reported that they were hospitalized a few months prior as a result of a fall from their bed while being provided care. R41 reports that they were lying on their side while their assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA D) was providing incontinence care. R41 explained that they were facing away from the CNA when they started to roll out bed. R41 explained that they ultimately fell onto the floor, hitting their head, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 3018720 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the completion of bladder scans following the removal of a catheter for one resident (R901) of one reviewed for urinary retention. Findings include:A review of documentation submitted to the State Agency revealed R901 was transferred from the facility to the hospital for abdominal pain where it was alleged the resident had retained a significant amount of urine into their abdomen.A review of R901's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. R901 was admitted into the facility with diagnoses which included Displaced Oblique Fracture of Shaft of Left Femur, Diabetes, and Hypertension. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required 1-2 people for assistance with activities of daily living. Further review of the medical record revealed the following progress note:11/29/2025 11:03 (11:03am) Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 03/18/2026 at 8:21 AM an interview with Food Service Director (FSD) A regarding the frequency of use of the meat slicer found it is used periodically.On 03/18/2026 at 8:43 AM observed dried debris at the bottom of two clean equipment utensil bins.On 03/18/2026 at 9:09 AM an interview with FSD A found the cooks are responsible for cleaning and sanitizing clean utensil bins daily.On 03/18/2026 at 9:32 AM observed dried food debris accumulated on the underside of the meat slicer blade. When pointing out food debris, FSD A stated I see what you are talking about.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be clean to sight and touch.On 03/18/2026 at 8:39 AM observed a 2 x 2 opening in tiled floor area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises as well as proper storage of clean and sanitary supplies. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living affecting all residents. Findings Include:On 03/18/2026 at 9:50 AM observed black debris accumulated on the inside shelf of the cabinet located under the sink in the nourishment room. Further observation of the sink drain found multiple straws within as a possible clogging factor.On 03/18/2026 at 10:08 AM observed an assortment of discarded items layering the bottom of the clean linen transfer bin under the inside support floor (used to help bring linen near the top of the bin).An interview at this time with Housekeeping Manager (HM) C regarding expectations for frequency of cleaning bins found it should be cleaned after every load.On 03/18/2026 at 10:10 AM observed the cold-water handle missing from the handwash sink in the laundry room. An interview with HM C at this time found that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of tube feeding poles for two residents (R1 and R4) of two resident rooms reviewed for cleanliness. Findings include: R4 On 3/17/2026 at 10:52 AM, R4 was observed in bed asleep. An observation of the resident's tube feeding pole was observed to have a buildup of dried brown tube feeding liquid. On 3/18/2026 at 9:04 AM and on 3/19/2026 at 9:36 AM, the tube feeding pole was observed in the same soiled manner. R1On 3/17/2026 at 11:00 AM, R1 was observed in bed asleep. An observation of the resident's tube feeding pole was observed to have a buildup of dried brown tube feeding liquid.On 3/19/2026 at 9:38 AM, the tube feeding pole was observed in the same soiled manner. On 3/19/2026 at 12:29 PM, Unit Manager J and surveyor observed the tube feeding pole of R1 and acknowledged the soiled manner of tube feeding pole. Unit Manager J was asked whose responsibility is it to ensure the cleanliness of the tube feeding poles, and she explained it is housekeeping's responsibility. On 3/19/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care planned interventions for two residents (R70 and R86) of four residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: R70 On 3/17/2026 at 11:04 AM, R70 was observed lying in bed with both hands contracted inward towards their wrist without hand splints. On 3/18/2026 at 10:00 AM and on 3/19/2026 at 10:00 AM and 12:38 PM, R70 was observed lying in bed with both hands contracted inward towards their wrist without hand splints. A review of R70's care plan did not reveal a care plan to address R70's hand contractures or extremity impairments. A review of R70's medical record noted, R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on 3/10/26, and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage. A review of R70's Nursing readmission Evaluation dated 3/17/2026 revealed, . Part 2 - V 6. Section VII: Musculosketetal 5. Range of motion 1. Limitations. Specify ROM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to promote wound healing for two residents (R7, R36) of five residents reviewed for management of pressure ulcer wounds. Findings include: R36 On 03/17/2026 at 10:04 AM, R36, was observed on their back in bed. Both shoulders were flat on the bed with the head of the bed up around 30 degrees. No devices were observed at the sides of the torso to offload pressure, and a specialty or low air loss mattress was not in place. R36 did not respond verbally to the call of their name or the knock on the door. The legs of R36 were flexed at the knees so that the heels were up toward and near the buttocks (a frog legged appearance). Certified Nursing assistant (CNA) L reported the position of the legs as normal for R36, and they had not seen the legs to fully extend. At 12:55 PM and 1:38 PM, R36 was observed in bed as before. At 4:38 PM, 5:09 PM and 5:32 PM, R36 was observed in a similar position on their back in bed, legs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medical record which reflects the resident's current status for the use of oxygen for one resident (R86) of one reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: On 3/17/2026 at 10:38 AM, R86 was observed in bed. The resident was not observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula, and there was not an oxygen concentrator or tank in the room. R86 explained they had a diagnosis of Sarcoidosis and was upset they had contracted pneumonia while residing in the facility. A review of R86's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Interstitial Pulmonary Disease and Sarcoidosis of Lung. Further review revealed they were cognitively intact and required two-person assist with Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the medical record revealed an active order dated 12/22/25 indicating the following, Oxygen: Run @ (at) 2[x]L/MIN (liters per minute) VIA [x] N/C (nasal cannula) Continuous every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer two medication doses correctly out of 32 opportunities for one of one resident (R97) resulting in a medication error rate of 6.25 percent. Findings include: On 03/18/2026 at 8:57 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K was observed to prepare six medications for R97. The divalproex sodium 125 (milligrams) MG Delayed Release Oral Capsule order documented to give six capsules for a combined dosage of 750 MG capsule. One 125 MG was placed into the medication cup. The calcium carbonate 750 MG Chewable Tablet documented one tablet was to be given. One 500 MG was dispensed into a second medication cup. The medications were brought to the room and administered to R97. Upon return to the medication cart the orders for the divalproex and the calcium carbonate were reviewed with LPN K. LPN K remarked I need to give more. On 03/19/2026 at 12:15 PM, the Acting Director of Nursing (ADON) reported there was a performance improvement plan in place related to the number of new nurses hired by the facility. The ADON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform timely hand hygiene in one of one resident (R102) during medication passes. Findings include: On 03/18/2026 at 9:57 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) I was observed to move the medication cart to the opposite hall and prepare medications for R102. RN I removed three medications from the medication cart to administer to R102 via a feeding tube. RN I crushed two of the medications. The third was a liquid. RN I walked down to the room of R102. RN I set the medications down on the gown disposal bin and put on a gown and gloves. RN I picked up the medications and placed them on the tray table. RN I noted there was no water container for the administration of the medications. RN I removed the gown and gloves and exited the room. RN I walked down the hall passing hand sanitizer stations and went to the supply area and returned with a container and syringe. RN I returned to the entry of R102's room and donned a gown and pair of gloves and filled the container with some water from the sink and administered the three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure treatment and services were provided in a dignified manner for eight residents, (R#'s 20, 70, 10, 76, 17, 13, 5, and 405) of eight residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R20 On 1/13/25 at 1:19 PM, R20 was observed in the Rainbow dining room in their geri-chair (reclining lounge chair). R20 was being fed their lunch meal by CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 'B'. At the conclusion of the meal, CNA 'B' was observed to transport R20 down the hall in their geri-chair by pulling the chair in a forward motion with the chair and R20 facing rearward. On 1/13/25 at 1:22 PM, CNA 'B' was asked about pulling R20 backward in the geri-chair and said sometimes the wheels on the chair drift from side to side. They were asked if they were instructed to pull the chair with the resident facing rearward and they said no, the resident should face forward and the chair should be pushed from behind. On 1/14/25 at 4:10 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the proper way to transport a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$45,429 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $45,429 — penalty dated 2024-10-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $962K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI