Medilodge of Zeeland
285 North State St, Zeeland, MI 49464 · For profit - Corporation · 138 certified beds · (616) 772-4641 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.6% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.7% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.9% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.1% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.4% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.4% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.2% | 11.7% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.7%CMS range 37.2–59.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.3–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.4–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 119.1 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to intake # 2714532 and 2725669Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly identify a change in condition and act upon those changes for 1 resident (Resident #1) out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in continued deterioration and subsequent death. Findings:Resident #1 (R1)Review of an admission Record revealed R1 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: stroke and palliative care. R1 was not his own responsible party and had a guardian in place.Review of the facility admission Agreement signed by R1's guardian on 5/2/25 revealed, VII. ADVANCE DIRECTIVE A resident has the right to formulate an advance directive with respect to the resident's desire to accept or refuse medical treatment.Review of R1's Advance Directives dated/signed by the guardian on 5/2/25 revealed R1 was a full code and was to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a respiratory ventilator, artificial hydration,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to timely meet the needs for seven facility residents (R2, R15, R14, R95, R13, R48, and R6) and failed to respond effectively to the concern of the members of the Resident Council. Findings include.R48 Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected that R48 has pertinent diagnosis that includes absence of left leg below the knee, adjustment disorder w/ mixed anxiety and depressed mood, constipation, dependence on wheelchair and PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS – a tool used to determine a resident's status) revealed R48 was cognitively intact. Section GG (functional Abilities and Goals) of this MDS reflected the Resident was dependent on staff for transfers, and bed mobility. During an interview on 05/04/2026 at 12:22 PM, R48 stated they don't have enough staff (especially on 3rd shift) I can't always choose when I want to go to bed because there are not enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a skin care plan for 1 Resident (R13) of 1 resident reviewed for skin care.Findings included: Review of R13's face sheet dated 5/4/26 revealed he was [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: diabetes mellitus, pressure ulcer right hip, stage 4, lack of coordination, and reduced mobility. R13 was his own responsible party.R13 was observed in bed on 5/4/26 at 1:54 PM. He had an electrical motor attached to his mattress with the setting on firm. R13 did not know what his mattress setting should be. He knew he had sores on his butt and back but was not aware if they were healing. R13 was on his back in bed and there were no extra pillows visible to use for side to side turning. R13 was frustrated with his attempts to get staff to help get cleaned up and turned in bed. He complained about long-call light waits and staff complaining about being short staffed. R13 put on his call light for help at this time and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to formulate and implement a plan of action to monitor, treat, and prevent the worsening of impaired skin for one Resident (R2) of two residents reviewed for impaired skin. Findings include:Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected R2 admitted to the facility 10/7/2025 with pertinent diagnoses that included bilateral below knee amputation and limitation of activities due to disability, Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a tool used to determine a resident's status) dated 4/8/2026 revealed R2 was cognitively intact. Section GG (functional Abilities and Goals) of this MDS reflected the Resident was dependent on staff for transfers.On 5/4/2026 at 12:06 PM, an interview was conducted with R2 in his room. R2 reported he required the use of a mechanical lift to transfer from his wheelchair to his bed. R2 reported he often had to wait, sometimes for an hour while sitting in his wheelchair for staff to transfer him back to his bed. R2 reported a spot on his bottom opened up a few days ago and a dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure the safety of 2 two residents (R40) for safe bed mobility and for (R7) to prevent numerous falls, of 12 reviewed for accident hazards.Findings include:R7 Review of Face Sheet revealed Resident #7 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease with Dyskinesia, anemia, bipolar disorder and encounter for palliative care. A review of R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs), dated 4/29/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 99 which revealed R7 was unable to complete the assessment/interview. Review of R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected Resident had fallen from his bed seven times in the last 6 months. Review of R7's Care Plan Interventions for falls included, Utilize positioning devices such as pillows and wedges for safe positioning. Date Initiated: 04/13/2026. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep an accurate tube feeding record for 1 resident (R40) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding.Findings included: Review of R40's face sheet dated 5/5/26 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intercranial hemorrhage (brain injury causing lack of movement), seizures and gastrostomy status (tube fed). R40 was not her own responsible party.R40 was observed in bed on 5/4/26 at 11:30 AM. R40's tube feeding was running at 65 ml(milliliters)/hour (hr). The bottle was dated 5/3/26. The tube feed bottle held 1000 ml. There was approximately 950 ml still in the bottle. (There was no indication what time the feeding started).During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H on 5/5/26 at 11:39 AM, LPN H said the 2nd shift nurse started R40's tube feeding and the 1st shift nurse turned off the pump and disconnected the tube feeding. LPN H reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a contract and followed the policies and procedures to coordinate hospice services and care for 1 (R 39) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet Revealed R39 had received hospice services. Review of an Order Summary for R39 revealed an order for hospice dated 7/11/25. In an interview on 5/4/26 at 11:44 AM, the Power of Attorney (POA) for R39 reported the resident was on hospice and was having some depression since her husband died and not eating well. R39 was on hospice and not sure when hospice would come out to visit R39. The POA for R39 reported that the resident could be strong willed at time and hard to deal with because of her cognitive decline. Review of the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) for R39 revealed the last scanned in document dated 3/18/26 was from the Chaplain for spiritual care. The last Hospice Nurse visit was documented on 3/10/26 in the progress notes. Review of the Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #2735204Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified care to one Resident (R105) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include Review of the admission record for R105 reflected the Resident originally admitted to the facility 9/23/2015 and had current pertinent diagnoses that included: quadriplegic (paralysis of all four limbs), Traumatic Brain Injury, and Hydronephrosis (urine cannot properly drain from the kidneys). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used to assess a resident's care needs) dated 2/12/2026 reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to assess a resident's cognitive status) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated R105 was moderately cognitively impaired.During an interview conducted 3/3/2026 at 1:45 PM, Unit Clerk (UC) I reported R105 was transported by facility staff to the hospital every two weeks for a routine procedure.On 3/4/2026 at 8:30 AM, an interview was conducted with Transportation Nurse Aide (TNA) J who reported the hospital is a seventeen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2666838Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse/neglect for 5 (R4, R5, R7, R9, and R10) of 10 residents reviewed.Findings include: F609 Resident #4 (R4)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R4 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia in lack of coordination. Resident #5 (R5)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R5 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of alcohol induced dementia, Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, and major depressive disorder. Resident #7 (R7)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R7 originally admitted [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with psychotic disturbances, and generalized anxiety disorder. Resident #9 (R9)Review of a Face Sheet for R9 revealed she originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbances,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2666838Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 5 (R4, R5, R7, R9, and R10) of 10 residents reviewed.Findings include:Resident #4 (R4)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R4 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia in lack of coordination. Resident #5 (R5)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R5 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of alcohol induced dementia, Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, and major depressive disorder. Resident #7 (R7)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R7 originally admitted [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with psychotic disturbances, and generalized anxiety disorder. Resident #9 (R9)Review of a Face Sheet for R9 revealed she originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of dementia with behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2666838Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized interventions, review and revise care plans, and provide adequate supervision for 5 residents (R4, R5, R7, R9, and R10) of 10 residents reviewed for dementia care.Findings include:Resident #4 (R4)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R4 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia and lack of coordination. Resident #5 (R5)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R5 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of alcohol induced dementia, Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, and major depressive disorder. Resident #7 (R7)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R7 originally admitted [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with psychotic disturbances, and generalized anxiety disorder. Resident #9 (R9)Review of a Face Sheet for R9 revealed she originally admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #2666838Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain a system for complete and accurate medical records for 5 (R4, R5, R7, R9, and R10) of 10 residents reviewed for medical records.Findings include:Review of the electronic medical records (EMR) for R4, R5, R7, R9 and R10 revealed a lack of documentation regarding the following incidents: R4Review of a Risk Management document dated 12/28/25 for R4 revealed No documentation regarding the incident on 12/28/25 when R4 was observed in R5's room laying on his bed exposing himself to her. No documentation indicating the physician or the guardian was notified or what interventions were put into place. R5Review of the EMR for R5 revealed no daily behavior documentation or documentation regarding resident-to-resident incidents on 10/22/25, 12/24/25, 12/28/25. Review of a Behavioral Health progress note dated 12/24/25 for R5 revealed: Previously, patient demonstrated significant behavioral disturbances including yelling/screening, kicking/hitting, pushing, grabbing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: MI00153297 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient supervision and safety measures were in place to prevent an elopement for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, safety, and supervision. Findings: Resident #1 (R1) Review of an admission Record revealed R1 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's Disease and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of R1's Facility Reported Incident dated 3/27/25 (from R1's previous facility) revealed R1 had eloped .Resident exited the facility unsupervised at 0510 am. She exited the building through the left exit doors in the main dining room . Review of R1's Nursing admission Screening/History dated 3/27/25 revealed the reason for admission was elopement. Review of R1's baseline care plan section C revealed, MAY WANDER OR ATTEMPT TO LEAVE FACILITY UNATTENDED . Review of R1's Patient admission Information dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living, affecting the following areas: Findings include: Rooms 409/411 During an observation on 2/25/25 at 9:52 AM and 12:17 PM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had a shared bathroom with room [ROOM NUMBER]. Inside the bathroom was a dirty exhaust fan and an oxygen concentrator with a nasal canula connected to it stored under the sink. During observations on 2/26/25 at 7:34 AM and 9:22 AM rooms 409/411 still had the oxygen concentrator in the bathroom with the nasal cannula attached to it. During an observation and an interview on 2/27/25 at 9:30 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B accompanied this surveyor to the connected bathroom for rooms 409/411 and saw the oxygen concentrator with the nasal cannula attached, stored under the sink next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote resident dignity for 1 (R21) of two residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed R21 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) and psoriasis (a skin condition in which skin cells build up and form scales and itchy, dry patches). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R21, with a reference date of 1/22/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R21 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed R21 required staff assistance with toileting. In an interview on 2/27/2025 at 8:22 AM, R21 reported she had a bowel movement the previous morning at 8:10 AM and pushed her call light. R21 reported Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J entered her room and she told him that she had soiled herself and needed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement dermatology recommendations in a timely manner for one resident (R21) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed R21 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) and psoriasis (a skin condition in which skin cells build up and form scales and itchy, dry patches). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R21, with a reference date of 1/22/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R21 was cognitively intact. In an observation and interview on 2/25/2025 at 11:56 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], R21 reported she had a rash, itching, and burning under her right breast that staff were not treating. R21 reported this was an ongoing issue and she had recently been to a dermatologist. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper tube feeding precautions were implemented and maintained for one resident (R37) of two residents reviewed for enteral feeding. Findings: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected R37 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a history of stroke, dementia, and was receiving nutrition through a feeding tube. Review of the Doctor's Orders dated 2/14/25 for R37 reflected an enteral feed order and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) reflected or Glucerna 1.5 to be delivered at 100 cubic centimeters (cc) per hour. On 2/25/25 at 9:28 AM, a dressing change for R37 was observed in the Resident's room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) R and Unit Clerk (UC) T. It was observed that the head of the bed was elevated approximately ten degrees and R37 was turned onto his left side during the dressing change that lasted approximately fifteen minutes. It was observed that the enteral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were maintained during a dressing change for one resident (R37) of three residents reviewed for infection control. Findings: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected R37 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a history of stroke and dementia, Review of the EMR Progress Notes entry dated 1/28/25 at 2:32 AM reflected a three-centimeter (cm) lump was identified at the hairline of the neck of R37 and the medical provider was notified. On 2/5/25 the Progress Note entry at 3:39 PM reveal a change in the lump and R37 was transported to the hospital for evaluation. On 2/13/25, R37 returned from the hospital with a wound vac dressing (also known as vacuum assisted closure (VAC), a medical device sealed over a wound that uses negative pressure to pull fluid and debris out of the wound promoting granulation tissue growth). The entry reflected R37 was referred to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00148411 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess timely, monitor, treat and adequately control pain for 1 Resident (R1) of 3 Residents reviewed for pain. Review of R1's face sheet dated 2/6/25 revealed she was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: 11/28/24 encounter for other orthopedic, polyneuropathy (peripheral nerve disorder that affects multiple nerves throughout the body simultaneously), pain in right shoulder, generalized anxiety disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body), Pseudobulbar affect (inappropriate involuntary laughing or crying due to nervous system disorder) and mild cognitive impairment. R1 was listed as her own responsible party. Review of R1's progress note dated 1/20/25 at 12:44 PM revealed R1 had a mental evaluation, and she score 15 out of 15 on her Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS). Normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00145408. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for medication use, resulting in the potential for residents to not meet their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included seizures, fibromyalgia, and hypertension. In a telephone interview on 7/16/2024 at 9:05 AM, Hospital Case Manager B reported it was learned while preparing Resident #101 for discharge from the hospital back to the facility on 6/28/2024 that Resident #101 had not been taking all the medications according to discharge orders the last time she was discharged from the hospital back to the facility on 6/18/2024. Review of Resident #101's local hospital Hospitalist Discharge Summary, dated 6/28/2024, revealed .Patient well known with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00145408. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent and adequately trained to reconcile physician's orders and medications during the admission process, resulting in the potential for compromised resident safety and the potential for residents to not meet their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included seizures, fibromyalgia, and hypertension. In a telephone interview on 7/16/2024 at 9:05 AM, Hospital Case Manager B reported it was learned while preparing Resident #101 for discharge from the hospital back to the facility on 6/28/2024 that Resident #101 had not been taking all the medications according to discharge orders the last time she was discharged from the hospital back to the facility on 6/18/2024. Review of Resident #101's local hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00145408. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews, which noted irregularities or recommendations, were addressed by the physician in a timely manner for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for medication use, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications, negative medication side effects, and for residents to not meet their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included seizures, fibromyalgia, and hypertension. Review of Resident 101's electronic medical record on 7/16/2024 at 1:05 PM revealed the pharmacist perform Medication Regimen Reviews for Resident #101 for each re-admission from the local hospital on 6/16/2024 and 6/28/2024. Review of Resident #101's Medication Regimen Review Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one medication cart was secure and medications were properly stored in two medication carts and failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of a biological medication in one medication storage room. Findings: On [DATE] at 7:14 AM a review of the 400-hall medication cart #2 revealed eight loose pills in the bottom of the second drawer amongst bubble packed medications. Registered Nurse (RN) P reported she could not identify what the variety of medications were or to which resident the medications belonged. On [DATE] at 7:38 AM a review was conducted on the 300 long hall medication cart with LPN O. Review of the second drawer revealed ten loose pills among medications in bubble packs. LPN O indicated he did not know to whom the loose medication belonged. The policy provided by the facility titled Medication Administration Subject Medication Access and Storage dated [DATE], was reviewed. The policy Procedure reflected 1. The provider…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reduce the risk of contamination in spa and laundry areas and have an ongoing and active plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in contamination of surfaces, clean linen, and for water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system. Findings include: During a tour of the laundry room, with Maintenance Director (MD) B and Housekeeping Manager (HM) C, at 1:15 PM on 2/5/24, it was observed that two light shields were missing over the dryer and folding area as well as two light shields missing in the dirty laundry room. When pointed out the MD B he stated he would get them fixed. During a tour of the 100 hall spa room, at 1:25 PM on 2/5/24, it was observed that a streak of brown bowel movement was found on the middle section of a blue shower chair. When asked if she could see the accumulation, HM C stated yes. When asked how cleaning is performed in the spa rooms, HM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for one Resident (Resident #3 (R3)) that had been provided a motorized wheelchair. Findings: R3 originally admitted to the facility 9/23/15. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflects R3 has current diagnoses that include Quadriplegia and Neuromuscular Dysfunction. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and the MDS dated [DATE] were both reviewed. Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goal, of both MDS assessments reflected R3 has a motorized wheelchair. On 2/5/24 at 4:33 PM an interview was conducted with R3 in his room. R3 was observed to be in a motorized wheelchair. R3 demonstrated the chair can be tipped backward severely and reported that when he does this it scares people. R3 indicated he reclines the chair back to relieve the pressure on his buttocks. Review of the Care Plan for R3 reflected a Focus of .Activities of Daily Living (ADL)) self-care deficit (related to) immobility . (R3) Currently in Broda…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for 2 dependent residents (Resident #51 and Resident #101), of 2 residents reviewed for showers. Findings include: Resident #51 (R51) Review of a Face Sheet for R51 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of fetal alcohol syndrome and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R51 reveals that she is severely cognitively impaired and has functional limitations for range of motion (ROM) on bilateral upper and lower extremities. She is totally dependent for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including showers/bathing. During an observation on 2/5/24 (Monday) at 11:04 AM, R51 is laying in bed with greasy disheveled hair. The resident was nonverbal. During an observation on 2/6/24 (Tuesday) at 7:47 AM, R51 is laying in bed on her back partially covered, her hair is disheveled and has greasy appearance. In an interview on 2/6/24 at 4:50 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure quality care was provided to one resident (Resident #16 (R16)) of two residents reviewed resulting in a delayed assessment and subsequent hospital treatment. Findings: R16 initially admitted to the facility 10/23/15. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the Resident is cognitively intact. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Progress Notes for R16 revealed a nurse entry dated 10/4/23 at 3:57 AM. The entry revealed that Resident had come up to nurses' station several times in the last 2 hours with different GI complaints. The entry reflected at 03:45 (AM), during the fourth time of voicing a complaint to the nurse, R16 vomited at the nurse's station. The documentation continued with It was then discovered that the resident's temp (sic) was 101.8 (Fahrenheit) The entry reflected within 10 minutes R16 was transported to the hospital.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for contractures for 1 (Resident #51) of 1 resident reviewed for contractures. Findings include: Resident #51 (R51) Review of a Face Sheet for R51 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of a need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R51 reveals that she is severely cognitively impaired and has functional limitations in range of motion (ROM) on bilateral upper and lower extremities. She is totally dependent for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including showers/bathing. During an observation on 2/5/24 at 11:04 AM, R51 is nonverbal, lying in bed and her right arm was bent at the elbow and her fingers clenched in her hand. No splints, slings, or positioning devices in place. During an observation on 2/5/24 at 11:42 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D is providing care for R51 who was not able to use her right upper extremity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #155) from a total sample of 18 residents reviewed, was free from accidents and hazards when a functioning nurse call system was not available in the resident room. Findings: Resident #155 (R155) Review of an admission Record reflected R155 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that included a need for surgical aftercare, heart disease, severe obesity, acute posthemorrhagic anemia (blood loss), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), high blood pressure, weakness and a need for personal assistance. Review of an admission Fall Risk Assessment dated 2/1/2024 reflected R155 was at High Risk for Falling. Review of a Kardex (a care guide) as of 2/7/2024 reflected R155 was Full Weight Bearing and needed one person to assist with transfers, personal hygiene, dressing and bathing/showering. During an observation and interview on 2/6/2024 at 3:30 PM, R155 could not reach the call light. The cord…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards for tube feedings for 1 (Resident #51) of 2 residents reviewed for tube feedings. Findings include: Resident #51 (R51) Review of a Face Sheet for R51 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R51 reveals that she is severely cognitively impaired. During an observation on 2/5/24 at 11:42 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D turned off the tube feeding machine for R51 before providing care and lowering the head of the bed. CNA D turned the machine back on and pressed a few buttons which changed the settings, then turned it off again and went to get the nurse. When the nurse came to the room, she turned the machine off and told the CNA she will turn it back on when he is done providing care. The tube feeding that was infusing was dated for 2/4/24 at 13:13 (1:13 PM) indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS) DPS #1 This citation pertains to intake M100140945. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures and have medications available for 1 (Resident #102) of 1 resident reviewed for new admissions. Findings include: Resident #102 (R102) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R102 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 2/6/24 at 2:15 PM, R102 reported she admitted to the facility post hospitalization on 11/8/24 and the facility did not have her medications when she arrived. She reported she received her Lyrica at 11 PM on 11/8/23 (not documented on the MAR). R102 reported the manager was supposed to talk to her before she left the faciity on [DATE] at 1:30 PM but nobody came to talk to her. She then left AMA (against medical advice). Review of a Hospital Discharge Summary document dated 11/8/23 and faxed to the facility on [DATE] at 2:36 PM for R102 revealed a list of medications the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures and provide informed consent and pertinent labs for 1(Resident #81) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications/psychotropic medications. Findings include: Resident #81 (R81) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R81 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, remission of alcohol abuse, and cognitive communication deficits. Review of the February Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R81 revealed he is taking Depakote (Divalproex) and Klonopin (Clonazepam) which are psychotropic medications that require informed consent and monitoring. Review of the Divalproex/Depakote medication insert from the drug manufacturer revealed: Hepatotoxicity, including fatalities, usually during the first 6 months of treatment. Monitor patients closely and perform liver function tests prior to therapy and at frequent intervals thereafter (5.1) . 5.14 Monitoring: Drug Plasma Concentration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize their policy and procedures and provide vaccines for 2 (Resident #64 and Resident #65) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccines. Findings include: Resident #64 (R64) Review of a Face Sheet for R64 revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R64 revealed his last influenza vaccine was 11/30/21 and his pneumovax was 12/2/20. Documentation does not reveal vaccines were offered and administered to the resident. Review of R65 Resident #65 (R65) Review of a Face Sheet for R65 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the EMR for R65 revealed there is no documentation indicating he was offered and provided vaccines to make sure they are up to date for COVID-19, pneumonia, and influenza. In an interview on 2/7/24 at 1:41 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported R64 and R65 missed the flu clinic in the fall and did not get offered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post the total number of hours scheduled and actual number of hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for 6 of 6 days reviewed. Findings include: A review of the Nursing Staff Directly Responsible For Resident Care Sheets, dated 2/5/24 to 2/7/24, revealed the number of licensed and unlicensed staff (registered nurses (RN), licensed practical nurses (LPN), certified nursing assistants, nursing staff providing individualized one-on-one observations, and nurse management) were listed by shift. However, the scheduled hours for all of the staff were listed as 0. In addition, the actual hours worked were blank for the sheets dated 2/5/24 to 2/6/24. During an interview on 2/7/24 at 09:59 AM with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated nursing typically work 12-hour shifts. She stated their shifts are 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM and 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM. The DON also stated some staff still work 8 hour shifts. She stated for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOURINONE OPERATOR LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2025 |
| B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2025 |
| B&Y TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2025 |
| CODY HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2025 |
| CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2025 |
| FLASHNER, CRAIG | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2025 |
| PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2025 |
| BABAS 2013 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| ROBERT L NORCROSS II FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| ROBERT L NORCROSS II IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| NORCROSS, ROBERT | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| MEHLER, ELIEZER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| ROGERS, STACEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| HYPER CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| CAMPBELL, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| KIRK, KRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| SOLAREWICZ, KRYSTYNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| BURNBAUM, EDWARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/28/2025 |
| FOURINONE ACQUISITION GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| ZEELAND ACQUISTION GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235347. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.