No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Medilodge of Richmond

34901 Division Road, Richmond, MI 48062 · For profit - Corporation · 126 certified beds · (586) 727-7562 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (586) 727-7562 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Jun 20231 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 36% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
35000 Division Rd · (586) 727-5529 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
31505 32 Mile Rd · (586) 727-7721 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger1.9 mi
66900 Gratiot Ave · (586) 727-0125 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Beebe St · (586) 727-3064 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
35110 Division Rd · (586) 727-7270

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.5%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.1%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.8%4.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%3.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.8%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.6%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.9%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.2%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine52.2%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.8%24.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.941.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.541.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 128 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.5%CMS range 38.8–57.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.5–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.4%CMS range 2.5–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.79
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
58.9%
Total nursing turnover
64.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 119.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-13)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2709236.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two-person assistance to prevent a fall from the bed during care for one resident (R901) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in pain and a left leg laceration that became infected, required surgical debridement, and requires continued wound treatment. Findings include: Review of Intake 2709236 revealed an allegation that R901 fell from their bed on 12/06/25 while being provided incontinence care. The allegation indicated that one staff member was providing the care rather than two staff that was required.Review of the facility record revealed R901 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and their diagnoses included Congestive Heart Failure, Morbid Obesity, and Abnormal Posture. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 indicating intact cognition.On 01/07/26 at 12:09 PM, R901 was interviewed in their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 1183138.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide timely care to seven (R5, R18, R33, R34, R40, R95, and R99) of 24 residents. Findings include: On 07/21/25 at 9:38 AM during the initial screening of the facility residents: R95 reported Sometimes there is a long wait, like a half hour or more, when you push the call light for staff to come help you. R95 reported, It takes a half hour or so for call lights to be answered. R95 further reported they required assistance to eat and some staff don't like to feed (the residents). On 07/21/2025 at 10:19 AM, R33 was sitting up in bed dress in a hospital style gown. R33 reported concerns about not enough briefs and not enough staff. R33 reported they have waited longer than 30 minutes to get out of bed when they ask because they are a two-person transfer and their CNA has to go to another hall to get help. On 07/21/2025 at 10:30 AM, R5 was observed to be in bed connected to a tube feeding pump. The pump had a screen which read inactive and made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 1183138Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary grooming and hygiene (shaving and nail care) was provided for two (Residents #40 and #13) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) assistance. Findings include:R40On 07/21/2025 at 10:49AM, R40 was observed lying supine in bed with the head of the bed slightly elevated. R40's fingernails were irregular in length, some approximately a quarter inch past the tip of the finger, and visibly dirty. R40 was unshaven with an approximate eighth inch black stubble, and the toenails were long (eighth to quarter inch beyond the tips of his toes) and crusted. On 07/22/2025 at 3:20 PM, R40 was asked about facial hair and nails and R40 reported they preferred to be clean shaven and have their fingernails and toenails trimmed and kept clean. On 07/22/2025 at 3:25 PM, R40 was observed being repositioned and provided incontinence care by Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) M…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that ordered laboratory work was completed for one (R34) of three residents reviewed for laboratory services. Findings include:A review of the medical record for R34 revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, respiratory failure and diabetes. The care plan, dated 09/25/2023, identified the resident as having impaired cardiovascular status and diagnostic testing should be completed as ordered. An order for routine laboratory testing, including a complete blood count (CBC/Diff) with differential, and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) was entered for R34. Documentation date 02/28/2025 indicated the lab was unable to obtain a sufficient blood sample, noting, Couldn't get a vein quantity not sufficient. A review of the medical record revealed no evidence that a follow-up attempt was made to redraw the laboratory tests, and there was no documentation to indicate the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable and served in a timely manner for six residents (R21, R27, R33, R38, R99, R118) reviewed for food concerns from a census of 119 residents. Findings include:On 07/21/25 at 10:06 AM, during the initial screening, R21 reported their breakfast was cold today. On 07/21/2025 at 10:19 AM, during the initial screening, R33 stated, The food sucks. On 07/21/25 at 10:45 AM, R27 reported, they take good care of me, but the food is terrible, dried-up meat and almost choked on a hot dog. On 07/21/25 at 10:08 AM, R38 reported the meat can be tough and chewy, the eggs are served cold, and the Caesar salad was made with iceberg lettuce and served with Italian or ranch dressing. On 07/21/2025 at 10:40 AM, R99 reported the food is cold at one meal or another almost every day. R99 went on to say the oatmeal was served without brown sugar when requested so they had to buy their own; Staff can't or don't read the food tickets so R99 does not receive what is requested; They do not always get cereal or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment for three residents R9, R31, and R60 out of three residents reviewed for environment. Findings include: R9 On 06/11/24 at 9:30 AM, R9 was observed lying in bed in their room watching television. An observation of the privacy cubical curtains revealed several round brown stains on it. When asked about the dirty curtains, R9 nodded his head and stated clean. A record review revealed that R9 was admitted on [DATE] with the medical diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Right Dominant Side; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Apasia and Muscle Weakness. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] was completed with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 which indicates impaired cognition. R31 On 6/11/24 at 9:32 AM, R31 was observed lying in bed in their room watching television. An observation of the privacy cubical curtains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143507. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide twice weekly showers for one (R33) of five residents reviewed for showers. Review of the facility record for R33 revealed an admission date of 06/12/23 with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder and Urinary Tract Infection. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] was scored 15/15 indicating intact cognitive function. On 06/11/24 at 11:15 AM, R33 reported they had not consistently been assisted with a shower twice weekly as they had in the past. R33's spouse was on speaker phone at the time of the interview and reported they visit regularly and stated I know [R33] doesn't always get a shower twice a week. On 06/12/24 at 1:26 PM, R33 was observed to appear generally well groomed and clean. When asked about the frequency of being showered R33 stated I just had one on Sunday. I got them (showers) on the regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administration an intravenous (IV) antibiotic as ordered for one resident (R105) out of two reviewed for IV antibiotic use, resulting in missing eight doses of IV antibiotics. Findings Include: On 06/11/24 at 11:35 AM, R105 reported when they were admitted into the facility, they were on IV antibiotics and the medication ran out and they were without the treatment for at least a day. A review of the medical record revealed that R105 admitted into the facility on 5/8/2024 with the following diagnoses, Acute Osteomyelitis, Right Ankle and Foot and Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer of Right Heel and Midfoot with Fat Layer Exposed. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R105 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the physician orders revealed the following orders; -Ampicillin-Sulbactam Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 3 (2-1) GM (Ampicillin & Sulbactam Sodium) Directions: Use 3 gram intravenously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed and ensure residents on oxygen had full oxygen tanks available for three residents (R8, R59, R39) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R8 On 06/11/24 at 10:06 AM, R8 was observed sitting in their wheelchair at the sink in room. R8's oxygen tubing on the back of their wheelchair was in a bag and dated 5/28/24. Additional oxygen tubing was attached to a portable oxygen tank and dated 5/14/24. The oxygen tank on the back of the wheelchair was empty. R8 was not wearing oxygen at this time. On 06/11/24 at 12:17 PM, R8 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the hallway. The oxygen tubing on the back of the wheelchair was still dated 5/14/24 and the oxygen tank was empty. R8 was not wearing oxygen at this time. On 06/12/24 at 08:18 AM, R8 was observed awake lying in bed using oxygen at two liters per nasal cannula (NC) by concentrator. Portable oxygen tank on back of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions for reducing and/or eventually discontinuing the use of a restraint, and document and provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation for the continued use of a physical restraint for one sampled resident (R69), of one resident reviewed for restraints resulting in the potential for physical and psychosocial harm using the reasonable person concept. Findings include: On 6/5/23 at 12:47 PM, R69 was observed asleep in a Posey bed (a tent-like enclosure entirely covering a hospital bed. Someone on the outside of the bed must unzip one of the tent flaps before the individual can get out of the bed). A review of R69's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Schizophrenia, Developmental Disorder of Speech and Language, Seizures, and Anxiety. A review of R64's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated for 3/25/23 revealed that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake M100137029. Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement/document the care plan for repositioning frequency for one (R26) of two residents reviewed for repositioning, resulting in increased potential for skin breakdown. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R26 revealed an initial admission date of 08/02/17 and a most recent admission of 05/25/23 following hospitalization with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, Paraplegia and Epilepsy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R26 requires total assistance for bed mobility and all self care. The Brief Interview for Mental Status score was not recorded. R26 did not communicate verbally with the surveyor and did lightly nod their head at times in response to questions. Review of R26's Care Plan dated 03/22/23 revealed the Focus area description The resident has potential for impairment to skin integrity related to fragile skin, immobility secondary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were positioned appropriately during meals affecting two (R35 and R61) reviewed for the dining task, resulting in resident difficulty with self-feeding. Findings include: R61 On 6/5/23 at 12:49 PM, R61 was observed in their bed. R61's lunch tray was in front of them on the overbed table, however, the resident was slumped all the way over to their left side. R61 was holding an empty cup. A piece of cake was observed to have dropped out of the cup and onto the resident's bed. R61 expressed that they felt terrible. R61 was asked if they were comfortable. R61 asked why and stated, Because I'm sitting crooked? R61 then straightened themselves upright somewhat, but was unable to position themselves completely upright. On 6/5/23 at 1:20 PM, R61 remained completely slumped over to their left side in bed. R61's call light was noted to be on their right side, but the resident was unable to locate it. R61's cup of coffee had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00135394. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to one resident (R35), and provide and document showers for one resident (R38) of 10 reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) resulting in soiled bedding, unmet care needs, resident discomfort, and the potential for skin breakdown. Findings include: A review of R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was initially admitted into the facility on 1/19/2021 and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. R35's medical diagnoses include Dementia, Heart Disease, Diabetes, Seizures, Malnutrition, Muscle Weakness, and Abnormal Posture. Further review revealed that the resident is severely cognitively impaired and requires extensive assistance for toilet use and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 6/6/23 at 11:41 AM, R35 was observed lying in bed, surrounded by positioning pillows and covered with a blanket. R35 expressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and document repositioning of one sampled resident (R54) of two residents reviewed for positioning and skin management resulting in, the resident developing a facility acquired Deep Tissue Injury (DTI), pain, and the potential for the worsening/development of pressure ulcers. Findings Include: On 6/5/23 at 9:28 AM, R54 was observed in bed lying flat on their back, and asked how they were feeling on this date. R54 explained that they were uncomfortable due to be constipated, and had recently developed skin breakdown on their tailbone which causes them discomfort. R54 was asked if they had the skin impairment prior to being admitted into the facility, and they stated, No. R54 was asked about interventions being put into place to assist with healing the skin, and explained that they were recently provided a low air loss mattress, and is supposed to be seen by the wound care nurse. R54 was asked if they can reposition themselves, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Medilodge of FarmingtonFarmington, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand BlancGrand Blanc, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of HowellHowell, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MarshallMarshall, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Montrose IncMontrose, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MunisingMunising, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Sault Ste. MarieSault Ste. Marie, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of SouthfieldSouthfield, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of WestwoodKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge at the ShoreGrand Haven, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Capital AreaLansing, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of CheboyganCheboygan, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of East LansingEast Lansing, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of FrankenmuthFrankenmuth, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of GTCTraverse City, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of KalamazooKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of LudingtonLudington, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of St. ClairEast China, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Sterling HeightsSterling Heights, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Campus AreaEast Lansing, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of HillmanHillman, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivingstonHowell, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivoniaLivonia, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Mt. PleasantMt. Pleasant, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of PortagePortage, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ShorelineSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Tawas CityTawas City, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of TaylorTaylor, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ZeelandZeeland, MI 3 of 5The Lodge at TaylorTaylor, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of GaylordGaylord, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of HollandHolland, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LansingLansing, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LeelanauSuttons Bay, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of MilfordMilford, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of OkemosOkemos, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of Traverse CityTraverse City, MI 5 of 5Medilodge of AlpenaAlpena, MI

Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FIFTEENINONE OPCO GROUP LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/24/2013
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/24/2013
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/24/2013
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/24/2013
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/24/2013
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/24/2013
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/20/2014
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2018
GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/24/2013
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/24/2013
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/24/2013

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.3M
Related-party expense36% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 47%Medicare 7%Other / private 46%

This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 36% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$333per resident / day
operating cost
$10,120per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$311per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235486. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next