Medilodge of Hillman

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 37.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse in review of two Residents (#26 & #19) of three residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #19 experiencing ongoing emotional distress, including fear of a sense of safety within the facility when in proximity of Resident #26 who was the one involved in the altercation.Findings include:Resident #19 (R19)A review of R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 1/17/24, with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental health condition that develops after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event). R19 was noted to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15, indicating cognition was intact.On 9/9/25 during an initial interview at 11:15 AM, R19 stated they were hit on the head and choked by another resident, just the other day. R19 stated the resident who had hit and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00150640. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide safe and adequate assistance with bed mobility for one Resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. This deficient practice resulted in a fall with major injury, hospitalization, and death. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) on [DATE], revealed, on [DATE], [Registered Nurse (RN) H] called the complainant and told them [R2] was having a routine brief exchange done by one staff member [Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) D]. Complainant R stated that they were informed [CNA D] had rolled [R2] on her side. Complainant R stated that they were told that during this incident, [R2] fell out of bed, broke her shoulder and hip, and hit her head. Complainant R stated that [R2] passed away at the hospital on [DATE]. Complainant R stated that prior to this incident, there had always been two people present to change [R2].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-02-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is linked to intake MI00141867. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care per professional standards of practice for one Resident (R10) of three reviewed for pressure ulcer care. This deficient practice resulted in the worsening of a facility aquired pressure injury to an unsgateable pressure injury requiring antibiotics. Findings include: R10 R10 developed an in house Moisture Associated Skin Damage area on 11/24/23 which subsequently worsened to stage II, and ultimately progressed to an unstageable pressure injury on 2/5/24 with worsening measurements through 2/26/24. R10 also developed a wound infection, requring treatment with antibiotics. The facility failed to ensure the approriate pressure reducing surface for the bed was in place, failed to provide aspetic (clean technique) wound care, failed to consitently measure and document wound care, and failed to appropriately turn/reposition R10 for pressure relief. On 2/29/24 at 8:30 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-11 · tag F0923 — widespread
  Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable and homelike environment by failing to ensure proper exhaust ventilation in the facility allowing the build-up of foul odors with the potential to affect all residents in the facility.Findings include: On 09/10/2025 at 10:30 AM, observed that the ventilation fan was not working in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A tissue test at the exhaust grille over the toilet noted that it was not pulling air in. During a facility tour with MD I, it was noted that the vent fans were not working in the 100 wing and were also not working in the two hundred wing, rooms 211-217, and rooms 216 through 228.On 09/10/2025 at 11:32 AM, a strong odor of urine was observed in hall 210-217 Eagle Lane.On 09/10/2025 at 12:00 PM, MD I printed a copy of the work history report for the last 12 months, documented weekly, showing that the Exhaust Fans Task had been completed and the task signed off on 9/5/2025.On 09/11/2025 at 11:05 AM, during interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures at two hand washing sinks which could result in the potential for scalding risk to all residents that use these sinks.Findings include: On 09/09/25 at 11:20 AM, the water temperature at the handwashing sink in the dining room was measured with a rapid read thermometer to be 149 degrees Fahrenheit. The dining room was further observed to be accessible to all residents.On 09/09/2025 at 12:30 PM, the water temperature at the hand sink in the activities room called the Cowboy Lounge was measured with a rapid read thermometer to be 150 degrees Fahrenheit. On 09/10/2025 at 10:18 AM, interview with Head of Maintenance, Staff J noted that the sinks noted were on the same loop as the Laundry and they do not have individual mixing valves installed at the sink fixture.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an adaptive call light to accommodate a physical impairment for one Resident (#14) of one Resident reviewed for accommodations of needs and preferences.Findings include: Resident #14 (R14)Review of R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, stiffness of the left hand, stiffness of the right hand, cognitive communication deficit, repeated falls, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of R14's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/4/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment.On 9/9/25 at 11:22 AM, R14 was observed lying in bed. R14's left hand was observed to be contracted into a tight fist. R14's right hand was observed contracted into a tight fist with both the middle and ring fingers extended. A bedside table was positioned to the right of R14…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon pharmacist recommendations for one Resident (#2) of five residents reviewed for medication regimen review.Findings include:Resident #2 (R2)Review of R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 3/15/24 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Review of R2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/23/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicative of severe cognitive impairment.Review of R2's EMR revealed the following physician orders:Risperidone Intramuscular Suspension Reconstituted ER [extended release] 50 MG [milligram](Risperidone Microspheres). Inject 50 mg intramuscularly one time a day every 14 day(s), initiated 5/11/24.Ziprasidone HCl Oral Capsule 40 MG (Ziprasidone HCl). Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day, initiated 5/3/24.Review of a pharmacy recommendation, dated 5/5/25, read, This resident is currently being treated with Risperidone and ziprasidone, both atypical antipsychotics,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate labeling of inhaled medications in one (East Hall) of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage, resulting in the potential for unrecognized expiration of medications, decreased medication efficacy and adverse side effects of expired medications with the potential to affect all 18 residents residing on the East Hall. Findings include: On 10/08/2024 at 8:33 a.m., the East Hall medication cart was reviewed with Registered Nurse (RN) E. Observation of stored inhaled medications revealed an open box containing a Proair HFA inhaler (inhaled medication used to treat wheezing and shortness of breath). Further observation revealed the inhaler had 27 of 200 doses remaining. The inhaler or the box the inhaler was housed in was not labeled with a resident name, open date or expiration date. Upon inspection, RN E reported she could not determine who the inhaler belonged to, if the medication was expired, or when the medication would expire. Further review of the East Hall medication cart with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive information was in place for one Resident (R16) of 13 residents reviewed for advanced directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time). Findings include: The medical record revealed R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, stroke (cerebrovascular accident), and traumatic brain injury. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/8/2024, indicated R16 was classified with a primary diagnosis of Medically Complex Conditions including taking all nourishment via a tube feeding and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The medical record contained: - An ADVANCE DIRECTIVES / MEDICAL TREATMENT DECISIONS form which indicated a Medical Durable Power of Attorney and full resuscitation (full code) dated 9/1/2021. - A DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDER PATIENT ADVOCATED CONSENT form…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the identification and reporting of potential abuse or neglect for one Resident (#93) of two residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for unidentified abuse or neglect and further exposure to abusive situations. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed R93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, stroke, right side hemiplegia (paralysis of right side of the body), and right hip fracture. Further review of the MDS data revealed R93 was dependent on staff for transfers and required partial/moderate assistance for rolling left and right in bed. The MDS data indicated R93 had short-term memory impairment and moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Review of R93's MDS assessment, dated [DATE], revealed R93 expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of R93's electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the thorough investigation of potential abuse or neglect for one Resident (#93) of two residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for unidentified abuse or neglect and further exposure to abusive situations. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed R93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, stroke, right side hemiplegia (paralysis of right side of the body), and right hip fracture. Further review of the MDS data revealed R93 was dependent on staff for transfers and required partial/moderate assistance for rolling left and right in bed. The MDS data indicated R93 had short-term memory impairment and moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Review of R93's MDS assessment, dated [DATE], revealed R93 expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of R93's electronic medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention precautions for one Resident (Resident 20) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Resident 20 (R20) Review of R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed a nursing quarterly/significant change evaluation, dated 9/17/24, indicated R20 had one to two falls in the last 90 days. R20 had fallen on 8/28/24. R20 had a risk fall score of 21, indicating a high risk for falls. Review of R20's care plan, dated 8/7/23, read in part, .Focus .has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit related to dementia, generalized weakness .Interventions: High back wheelchair to promote independence and comfort when up in wheelchair. Ambulation: 1 person assistance with a gait belt .uses a wheelchair for ambulation/transfer .Focus .is at risk for falls/injury related to generalized weakness, high risk of falls, history of falls, impaired cognition with decreased safety awareness .Interventions .Floor alarm mat to right side of bed when resident is in bed, so that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a blood pressure altering medication within ordered parameters for one Resident (#19) or five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the unwarranted administration of the medication and the potential for adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident #19 (R19) Review of R19's Medication Administration Records (MARs) for September 2024 through October 9, 2024, revealed the following physician order: Midodrine HCL [medication used to treat symptomatic low blood pressure] 10 MG [milligram]. Give 0.5 tablet by mouth three times a day for low blood pressure . hold SBP > 100 [when the top number of the blood pressure is greater than 100] . adjusted per [attending physician] . Start Date: 7/29/2024 . Further revealed the medication was administered outside of the ordered parameters on nine occasions per documentation on the MARs: 9/05/2024, 8:00 a.m., blood pressure 131/81. 9/05/2024, 5:00 p.m., blood pressure 103/67. 9/07/2024, 5:00 p.m., blood pressure 100/64. 9/08/2024, 5:00 p.m., blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$47,740 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $47,740 — penalty dated 2025-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI