Medilodge of Traverse City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 73.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.18 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.36 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall with fracture for one Resident (R19) of five residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted a tibial (lower leg) fracture, with increased pain. Findings include: Review of R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/15/23, revealed R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and depression. R19 required assistance with toileting and was independent with transfers and walking. R19 was unable to participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, showing severe cognitive impairment. The sensory assessment revealed R19 was sometimes understood, and sometimes able to understand. Review of R19's accident and incident report, dated 11/17/23 at 10:14 a.m., revealed R19 was found by a housekeeping staff yelling for help and was observed sitting on the floor at the end of the bed, with her legs out facing her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-04-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of a high risk resident (Resident #66) for inadequate intake of foods and fluids during a COVID infection. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #66 having an acute change in condition requiring hospitalization where she was found with acute dehydration and septic shock and expired seven days after readmission to the facility. Finding include: Resident #66 (R66): A review of R66's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegic cerebral palsy, dysphagia, hx (history) of sepsis, and dementia. A review of R66's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she scored 6/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, indicating moderately impaired cognition. This assessment also showed she required limited assistance of one staff for eating. A review of a 1/10/23 Dietary Progress note by former Registered Dietitian (RD) H revealed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent Resident to Resident physical abuse for four Residents (R34, R54, R63, and R68) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R63 On 4/29/25 at approximately 2:00 p.m., R63 was observed pacing the hallway of the memory care unit without staff supervision. R63 was attempting to find someone, using derogatory language in her description and getting near residents and visitors faces. R63 then was observed grabbing the hand of R68 and stated, Come on! Come on! while attempting to redirect R68 down the hallway. R68 told R63, No!, when R63 began pinching R68's hand in between her thumb and index finger. R68 began to yell out when R63 closed her right hand to make a fist and hit R68 in the right upper arm, making R68 scream. Two staff members came from the hallway and from another resident room to separate the two residents with one staff member leading R68 into her room. R63 was then left unsupervised in the hallway and took another resident's hand, leading her towards the front door. A request for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report timely allegations of abuse (resident to resident), within two hours, to the State Agency (SA) for four Residents (R34, R54, R63, and R68) of four residents reviewed for abuse reporting. Findings include: R63 On 4/29/25 at approximately 2:00 p.m., R63 was observed pacing the hallway of the memory care unit without staff supervision. R63 was attempting to find a male, using derogatory language in her description and getting near residents and visitors faces. R63 then was observed grabbing the hand of R68 and stated, Come on! Come on! while attempting to redirect R68 down the hallway. R68 told R63, No! when R63 began pinching R68's hand in between her thumb and index finger. R68 began to yell out when R63 closed her right hand to make a fist and hit R68 in the right upper arm, making R68 scream. Two staff members came from the hallway and from another resident room to separate the two residents with one staff member leading R68 into her room. R63 was then left unsupervised in the hallway and took another…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to promote the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in a locked memory care unit. This deficient practice resulted in the continuation of numerous resident to resident altercations and falls. Findings include: On 4/29/25 at approximately 2:00 p.m., R63 was observed pacing the hallway of the memory care unit without staff supervision. R63 was attempting to find someone, using derogatory language in her description and getting near residents and visitors faces. R63 then was observed grabbing the hand of R68 and stated, Come on! Come on! while attempting to redirect R68 down the hallway. R68 told R63, No! when R63 began pinching R68's hand in between her thumb and index finger. R68 began to yell out when R63 closed her right hand to make a fist and hit R68 in the right upper arm, making R68 scream. Two staff members came from the hallway and from another resident room to separate the two residents with one staff member leading R68 into her room. R63 was then left unsupervised in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0923 — pattern
  Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure exhaust ventilation was functioning in resident bathrooms, on three halls, serving 22 of a total 74 residents. This deficient practice resulted in noxious odors permeating the resident environment, with the potential to cause unpleasant and uncomfortable living conditions. Findings include: On 4/30/25 at 10:45 AM, noxious odors were noted throughout the D hall. On 4/30/25 at 2:15 PM, in response to the presence of continued noxious odors on the D hall, an investigation was initiated into determining the functioning of the exhaust ventilation system for resident bathrooms. The bathrooms serving the following rooms were inspected for functioning exhaust by placing a paper towel over the ceiling mounted duct cover and determining if there was adequate negative pressure to hold the paper in place. The failure to hold the towel in place deemed a failure for that bathroom's exhaust system. This failure was noted in the bathrooms serving the following resident rooms: D Hall; 1, 5, 6 On 4/30/25 at 2:35 PM, an interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess for self administration safety in two residents (#67 & #8) of seven residents reviewed for safety with self medication administration. Findings include: Resident #67 (R67) On 4/30/25 at approximately 8:00 AM, during a medication administration, Registered Nurse A (RN A) was observed handing R67 a medication cup containing multiple medications. R67 then walked away without RN A verifying ingestion or providing supervision. R67 was left alone in their room with the medications. Review of R67's chart indicated that they had not been assessed for self-administration of medications. Resident #8 (R8) During an interview of R8 on 4/30/25 at 8:54 AM, the medication Trelegy, a prescription inhaler used for long term management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma (respiratory conditions causing difficulty in breathing) was observed on the bedside table. R8 stated that they had administered the medications earlier in the morning. R8 stated that the nurse had left the medication there and had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reviewed residents medical record for code status, ensure code status orders were signed by the physician, and ensure code status was uploaded to the resident chart in a timely manner for two Residents (R72 and R500) of three residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: R72 R72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of right femur head and neck fracture without operation. R72 was her own responsible party. Review of R72's progress notes revealed the following entry dated [DATE], This nurse entered resident's room to obtain blood glucose reading, Resident was observed in bed laying on right side, not responding to verbal stimulus. This nurse attempted to rouse resident by movement, but resident was still not responding. No pulse was observed when checking radial and carotid arteries. This nurse notified (Nurse Practitioner [NP]) of status. Absence of pulse was confirmed by this nurse and (NP). Family notified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow interventions to prevent further falls for one Resident (R54) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: R54 Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R54 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Review of R54's Incident and Accident reports revealed the following incident dated 11/20/24 and read, in part, Resident sitting on dining room chair. She had slid onto the floor. Assessed for injury. No c/o (complaint of) pain .Care plan updated to have Dycem nonslip mat in her wheelchair and dinning room chair . On 5/2/25 at 9:45 a.m. an observation was made of the dining room in the Memory Care Unit which R54 resides. R54 was observed coming out of her room after receiving care from Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D and was wheeled into the dining room. R54 did not appear to have Dycem underneath her in the wheelchair. An interview was conducted with CNA D who stated that she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (right hip fracture) to the State Agency (SA) for one Resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 8/23/24 with a discharge date of 9/8/24 to an acute care hospital. R1's diagnoses included Rhabdomyolysis (break down of skeletal muscles, history of falls, and muscle weakness. R1's 8/29/24 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. Review of R1's History and Physical from [Hospital Name] dated 9/8/24 read, in part, .Assessment/Plan: Patient had CT (compute tomography) scan of lumbar spines and pelvis without contrast .there is equivocal nondisplaced fracture line through right femoral neck . An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Interim Director of Nursing (DON) and Unit Manager/Registered Nurse A on 10/14/24 at 1130 a.m. who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for an injury of unknown origin (right hip fracture) for one Resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of R1's History and Physical from [Hospital Name] dated 9/8/24 read, in part, .Assessment/Plan: Patient had CT (compute tomography) scan of lumbar spines and pelvis without contrast .there is equivocal nondisplaced fracture line through right femoral neck . An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Interim Director of Nursing (DON) and Unit Manager/Registered Nurse A on 10/14/24 at 1130 a.m. who stated that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital after a fall from home. The hospital had conducted an x-ray and found no fractures, so R1 was admitted to the facility. When the facility was notified of R1 having a right hip fracture on 9/8/24, the hospital notes stated that it could have been from the fall prior to admission. An internal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #MI00145188. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified care was provided for one Resident (R1) of seven residents reviewed for dignity. This deficient practice resulted in an undignified care interaction for R1. Findings include: Review of the FRI (Facility Reported Incident) received by the State Agency (S.A.) revealed on 6/11/24 at approximately 8:30 p.m., R1 was observed by Registered Nurse (RN) B in the doorway assisting a resident to return to the secured memory care unit. At that time, R1 was attempting to exit the unit through the same door. Another nurse, RN A, told R1 she needed to stay on the unit and she had her hands over her ears. RN B reportedly observed RN A use a door-knocking gesture on R1's forearm to get her attention so she would not leave the unit. R1 did not sustain an injury per the skin assessment after the incident. The report showed an interview after the incident with RN A revealed they moved their hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $408K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI