The Lodge at Taylor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 100.3 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00145597. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions for a hypoglycemia (blood glucose/sugar) for one resident (R103) out of three residents reviewed for change in condition, resulting in R103 being hospitalized for hypoglycemia. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed, R103 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included End Stage Renal and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R103 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Review of a progress note with a date of 7/9/24 at 2:07 p.m. revealed, At 8:05 am Resident was found by another staff member to be unresponsive. code blue started. Team started performing CPR immediately. 911 was contacted. CPR continued for about 15 minutes until EMS arrived. EMS continued CPR for about 15 minutes. resident regained the pulse. EMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143341. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement adequate interventions in a timely manner for one resident (R103) deemed to be at very high risk for pressure ulcers out of five residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in the worsening of an existing stage 4 pressure ulcer. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that a resident was not receiving appropriate wound care treatment. On 3/27/24 at 11:08 AM, a Concerned Family Member for Resident #103 (R103) said R103 passed away on 1/31/24 because he was not receiving adequate wound care in the facility. A copy of R103's death certificate was provided. A review of the clinical record for R103 revealed an admission into the facility on 1/10/24 and discharged from the facility on 1/18/24. R103's diagnoses included gastrostomy status (feeding tube), tracheostomy, end stage renal disease, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, anoxic brain damage, resistance to multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI000132679 and MI00136138. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor abnormal skin condition, and implement interventions to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers for two (R411 and R421) of six residents reviewed resulting in R411 developing a Stage 3 pressure ulcer {Full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose/fat is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and rolled wound edges are often present with visible slough (wet/filmy yellow dead cells/tissue) and/or eschar (dry black dead cells/tissue)} that required hospitalization and R421 developing an infected and worsening unstageable sacral wound. Findings include: R411 The State Agency received a complaint that the resident developed a pressure ulcer of the coccyx/sacrum that required hospitalization while residing in the facility for Covid-19 management. According to R411's closed Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake 2602236.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safe maintenance of shower gurneys, as four out five were observed to be missing safety pins required to secure the side rails.Findings include:On 9/9/25 at 12:14 PM, the shower room in Hall C was observed to contain a shower gurney missing all required safety pins to secure the side railings.On 9/9/25 at 12:16 PM, the shower room in Hall B was observed to have two shower gurneys missing all pins to secure the side rails.On 9/9/25 at 12:20 PM, the shower room on Hall E was observed to contain a shower gurney missing two of the four required safety pins to secure side rails.Record review of maintenance logs revealed no evidence that shower gurneys were routinely assessed for safety. In addition, there were no documented requests to replace the missing safety pins. Lastly, review of Certified Nursing Assistant Competency form indicated no education related to the use of the shower gurneys.On 9/9/25 at 1:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a call button was within reach for one resident (R102) reviewed for call light access. Findings include:During an observation on 8/21/25 at 8:46 AM, R102 was observed awake and lying in bed. R102 was receiving breakfast meal assistance from a staff member. R102's call button was observed on the floor at the head of the bed. During an interview on 8/21/25 at 8:51 AM, Non-Certified Nurse Aide E said she had been in R102's room assisting him with the breakfast meal. During an observation and interview on 8/21/25 at 8:56 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B noted R102's call light on the floor and said that the resident could not reach it. LPN B indicated that R102 had the capacity to use the call button. A review of the clinical record for R102 documented an admission date of 7/24/25 with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate professional standards of practice by not securing a physician's order and properly documenting wound care for one resident (R102) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: During an observation on 8/21/25 at 8:24 AM, R102 was observed awake and lying in bed. A wound patch was observed on R102's right arm dated 8/16/25. During an observation and interview on 8/21/25 at 8:56 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B noted the patch on R102's right arm and stated, (R102) should have an order for the patch. LPN B reviewed R102's electronic health record (EHR) and confirmed there was no physician's order to apply a wound patch to R102's right arm or nursing note regarding the wound patch dated 8/16/25. A review of R102's EHR documented an admission date of 7/24/25 with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI000151505. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement adequate interventions and supervision to prevent multiple falls for one (R103) of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in injuries and hospital visits. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 1:30 p.m. R103 was observed in an activity room. The resident was observed attempting to propel herself in the wheelchair to exit the area. Unit Manager A was observed redirecting R103 multiple times by grabbing of the wheelchair and placing the resident back in the area. R103 was also observed motioning to UM A to move away from her when redirected by staff. R103 was non-interviewable due to cognitive impairment. On 5/6/25 at 2:20 p.m. R103's roommate was interviewed and stated, She is up all night, standing up by herself, and falls. She does not listen to anyone. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) documented R103 was initially admitted into the facility on 2/4/25 with a readmission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly on a consistent grievance received from residents at ten consecutive monthly Resident Council Meetings resulting in residents not having water passed to them on a regular basis and feelings of frustration due to not having their needs met. Findings include: On 12/10/24 at 1:44 PM R9 was observed in bed without water or water cup on their bedside or over-the-bed table. There was no type of hydration visible in the resident's room. R9 could not say if there had been water available to them at their bedside earlier. On 12/11/24 at 9:03 AM R9 was observed in bed without water or water cup on their bedside or over-bed table. There was no visible hydration in the resident's room. R9 was asked if water was offered to them earlier. R9 was unable to be meaningfully interviewed due to cognition impairment, but did ask for a drink of water. According to R9's Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident had resided at the facility since…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the over-bed tables in 7 resident rooms (#'s B4, C2, E4, G2, I11, I12, and J9). Findings include: On 12/10/24 between 2:00 pm-2:30 PM, in resident rooms B4,C2, E4, G2, J9, I2, I11 and I12, there were over-bed tables observed with missing edging, peeling surface veneer and rough, exposed particle board. The tables were no longer smooth and easily cleanable. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 3:15 PM, Maintenance Director K stated that he relies on staff to let him know when a table needs to be replaced. When shown the over-bed table in room C2 (the whole top surface was lifted away from the particle board) Maintenance Director K stated, It's water warped. It needs to be replaced.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening (PAS)/ Annual Resident (ARR) Mental Illness/ Intellectual Disability/ Related Conditions Identification forms DCH-3877 and/or DCH-3878 documents were reviewed, revised, and sent to the local state agency for review and/or evaluation for mental illness needs upon admission for two (R44 and R86) of four residents reviewed for PAS/ARRs, resulting in the potential for residents not to receive care and services appropriate to their mental health needs. Findings include: R86 On 12/10/24 at 2:51 p.m. review of the electronic medical record documented R86 was initially admitted into the facility on 9/12/24 and readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, anoxic brain damage, cocaine abuse, and adjustment disorder. According to quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], R86 had no speech, severely impaired cognition and dependent with all activities of daily living. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered and failed to notify the physician of missed doses for one resident (R250) out of five residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: On 12/10/24 at 10:41 AM, during an interview with R250, it was reported that intravenous antibiotics were not administered during dialysis. A record review of R250's electronic medical record (EMR) disclosed their admission to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of end stage renal failure and osteomyelitis (infection of bone) of left foot and ankle. Review of R250's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R250 required partial/moderate assist for most activities of daily living (ADLS). Review of R250's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 11/29/24 revealed intact cognition, with a score of 15 out of 15. Record review of physician orders documented that R250 was to receive Cefepime HCL (antibiotics) . should be administered intravenously once daily on Mondays,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate foot care for one resident (R32) out of four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Findings include: On 12/10/24 at 10:16 AM, R32's feet were observed to have long, jagged, thick, greenish/black-toe nails. Additionally, R32's feet had white patches of dry skin and moist debris encrusted between toes. During an interview, R32 expressed a desire for podiatry services due to the inability to provide nail care independently. A review of the electronic medical records (EMR) revealed that R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of morbid obesity, type two diabetes, and end stage renal failure. Review of R32's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 9/20/24 indicated that R32 scored 15 out of 15 (intact cognition). Review of R32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], it was noted that R32 exhibited dependency with most ADLs. Upon further review of R32's EMR it was discovered that R32…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to effectively communicate with a dialysis provider for one resident (R250) out of three residents requiring dialysis services, resulting in seven doses of antibiotics that were not administered as ordered by a physician. Findings include: On 12/10/24 at 10:41 AM, during an interview with R250, it was reported that intravenous antibiotics were not administered during dialysis. A record review of R250's electronic medical record (EMR) disclosed their admission to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of end stage renal failure and osteomyelitis (infection of bone) of left foot and ankle. Review of R250's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R250 required partial/moderate assist for most activities of daily living (ADLS). Review of R250's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 11/29/24 revealed intact cognition, with a score of 15 out of 15 (intact cognition.) Record review of physician orders documented that R250 was to receive Cefepime HCL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-07-18
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-26 for 8 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-23 for 30 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI