No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Medilodge of Lansing

731 Starkweather Drive, Lansing, MI 48917 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (517) 323-9133 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (517) 323-9133 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Nov 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
644 Migaldi Ln #300 · (517) 627-6024 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6421 W Saginaw Hwy · (517) 703-0537 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.5 mi
6430 W Saginaw Hwy · (517) 886-1060 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Delta Township Parks And Trails · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
7000 W Saginaw Hwy · (517) 321-6100

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.2%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.8%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.4%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.0%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.2%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.7%79.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.2%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.291.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.481.641.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.0%CMS range 38.6–70.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.2–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.81
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
48.6%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 74.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-03)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to clean and maintain food service equipment affecting 75 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage.Findings include:On 12/01/2025 at 9:40 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Manager I and District Manager Q. The following items were noted:The sole hand sink basin was observed draining very slowly. Dietary Manager I stated: I'll place a work order into TELS for maintenance repairs.The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 5-205.15 states: A plumbing system shall be: (A) Repaired according to LAW; and (B) Maintained in good repair.The True three-door reach-in cooler was observed with 1 of 2 interior lights non-functional. Dietary Manager I stated: I'll place a work order into TELS for replacement.The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 6-303.11 states: The light intensity shall be: (A) At least 108 lux (10 foot candles) at a distance of 75 cm (30 inches) above the floor, in walk-in refrigeration units and dry FOOD storage areas and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to clean and maintain the physical plant affecting 75 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage.Findings include:On 12/01/2025 at 2:18 P.M., An environmental tour of the facility Laundry Service was conducted with Director of Housekeeping and Laundry Services (DHLS) R. The following items were noted: Ten 24-inch-wide by 48-inch-long acoustical ceiling tiles were observed stained from previous moisture leaks. (DHLS) R stated: I will place a work order into TELS. Eight 12-inch-wide by 12-inch-long vinyl flooring tiles by eighteen 12-inch-wide by 12-inch-long vinyl flooring tiles were observed (etched, scored, stained, particulate), adjacent to the two commercial washing machines. The damaged flooring tile section measured approximately 8 feet-wide by 18-feet-long totaling 144 square feet. (DHLS) R stated: I will place a work order into TELS. An air gap was observed between the emergency exit double door metal threshold plate and door sweep assembly. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician medication and wound treatment orders in accordance with professional standards of practice, implement care plans, and provide resident care choices for one resident (R70) of 18 reviewed for quality of care, resulting in wound decline, uncontrolled pain and overall feelings of anger and frustration.Review of the Face Sheet, dated 12/3/25, reflected R70 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included paraplegia (paralyzed below waist), multiple pressure ulcers up to stage IV(full thickness tissue/muscle loss), hypertension, pain, anxiety and depression. Review of the Progress Note, dated 11/11/25, reflected, Therapy: unable walk or do transfer she[R70] is dependent on that task max for lower dressing sock and shoes toilet hygiene is max mod assist for upper body dressing bed mobility set up for eating and personal care. Nursing: wound care pain management, medication management,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and ensure adequate pain management for one of 18 reviewed for pain (Resident #70), resulting in untreated and unnecessary pain for R70.Review of the Face Sheet, dated 12/3/25, reflected R70 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included paraplegia (paralyzed below waist), multiple pressure ulcers up to stage IV(full thickness tissue/muscle loss), hypertension, pain, anxiety and depression. Review of the Progress Note, dated 11/11/25, reflected, Therapy: unable walk or do transfer she[R70] is dependent on that task max for lower dressing sock and shoes toilet hygiene is max mod assist for upper body dressing bed mobility set up for eating and personal care. Nursing: wound care pain management, medication management, labs super pubic cath. discharge plan go home with significant other. During an observation and interview on 12/01/2025 at 11:55 AM R70 was laying in bed, appeared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to honor dietary preferences for one (Resident #12) out of 3 reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/4/25, reflected R12 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 12/01/2025 at 10:42 AM, R12 was observed resting in bed. R12 reported difficulties with the facility honoring his meal preferences on his tray ticket. R12 explained that he requested two 8-ounce glasses of iced tea with ice and double portions at lunch and dinner. R12 stated that this preference is seldom honored. Review of R12's meal tray ticket reflected regular diet, double portion entree, vegetable and breakfast meat, no salt packet. Iced tea 16 oz add ice to both TEA 2% milk - 8 oz. (ounce). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2656668.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for one (R6) of three reviewed.Findings include:Review of the complaint received by the State Agency on 10/24/25 revealed, [R6] reported that staff, [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E and CNA F] punched her in the face .This incident was reported to the supervisor and none of the staff was investigated or suspended.Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included moderate intellectual disabilities, dementia, and major depressive disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/5/25 revealed R6 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 11/19/25 at 9:45 AM, R6 was observed in bed with the bedroom door open. A sign on the door revealed Do not enter without permission. After knocking and asking permission to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2656668.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one (R6) of three reviewed.Findings include:Review of the complaint received by the State Agency on 10/24/25 revealed, [R6] reported that staff, [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E and CNA F] punched her in the face .This incident was reported to the supervisor and none of the staff was investigated or suspended.Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included moderate intellectual disabilities, dementia, and major depressive disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/5/25 revealed R6 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 11/19/25 at 9:45 AM, R6 was observed in bed with the bedroom door open. A sign on the door revealed Do not enter without permission. After knocking and asking permission to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that controlled medication was administered and documented according to professional practice for one medication cart (to include six residents #7, #8, #9,#10, #11, and #12) out of five medication carts reviewed. Findings Included:Resident #7 (R7)Review of the medical record revealed R7 was admitted to the facility 08/18/2022 with diagnoses that included Parkinsons Disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atherosclerotic heart disease (disease caused by plaque buildup in arterial walls), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), emphysema (chronic lung disease with destruction and enlargement of the air sacs in the lungs), hypertension, orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure on rising), anxiety, constipation, polyneuropathy (peripheral nerve damage), and chronic pain. Review of R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS),with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/24/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15.Resident #8 (R8)Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake # 2567245Based on interview and record the facility failed to ensure adequate care, follow up and documentation were in place regarding Advanced Directives, resident alleging fear of certain family members, and failure to assess, monitor and investigate allegations of unwanted visitors giving a resident medication that was not prescribed by facility physician and provided by facility pharmacy. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) admitted to facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes heart disease, diabetes and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Status score of 9 (moderate) cognitive impairment. Review of R1's physician orders reflected R1 was a full code, further review of R1's electronic medical record reflected R1 that Niece P had durable power of attorney and signed a form titled Advanced Directives Acknowledgement/CPR Consent on [DATE] the box do not resuscitate in the event of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents who consume food from the kitchen with a current facility census of 62 residents. Findings include: During a tour of the kitchen, starting at 9:00 AM on 10/1/24, it was observed that the top portion of the gasket, on the left door of the Raetone three door refrigeration unit, was found to have an accumulation of spotted debris. During a tour of the kitchen, at 9:15 AM on 10/1/24, it was observed that the underside of the juice machine was found with fuzzy and sticky debris between the spouts of the unit, especially in and around areas where screws are located. When showed to Regional Dietary Manager (RDM) V, he stated they would get them cleaned. During a tour of the kitchen, at 9:17 AM on 10/1/24, observation under the single compartment preparation sink found water accumulation that spanned under the juice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0907 — pattern
    Provide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide and maintain therapy equipment in a manner that would allow for safe and consistent operation that meets the needs of all residents. Findings Include: An interview with Physical Therapy Manager (PTM) U, at 2:50 PM on 10/1/24, found that some equipment in therapy has not been working properly for all residents. When asked what issues have been occurring, PTM U went on to state that the parallel bars are not wide enough to be used properly for our residents who are bariatric. When asked how they are used for those residents now, PTM U stated that those residents have to use the side of the parallel bars and that makes them unable to use both sides to stabilize as they walk down. When asked about any other equipment, PTM U stated that the ScitFit elliptical bike doesn't seem to be working properly and that the resistance doesn't increase sometimes as the dial gets turned up. PTM U stated that some residents have noticed that as they want to increase the resistance and work harder on their recovery, the bike doesn't seem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for three (Resident #34, #57, and #62) of 16 reviewed. Findings include: Resident #34 (R34) Review of the medical record revealed R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease and unsteadiness on feet. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/9/24 revealed R34 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the fall care plan initiated on 2/1/24 revealed the following interventions: - Place walker within reach of bed on the left side - Resident often chooses to use four wheeled walker despite therapy recommendations and education of risks. Therapy gave resident standard front wheeled walker - Encourage resident to slow down with his motorized wheelchair - Dycem to wheelchair Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an elopement and respond timely to a door alarm for one (Resident #33) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #33 (R33) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, unsteadiness on feet and disorientation. The modified admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/9/24, reflected R33 scored three out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R33 was coded for wandering one to three days during the assessment look-back period that placed them at significant risk of getting to a potentially dangerous place, such as stairs or outside of the facility. On 10/01/24 at 10:10 AM, R33 was observed ambulating in the hallway, using a rolling walker. A wanderguard bracelet was observed on their left ankle. On 10/03/24 at 7:29 AM, R33…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of an antipsychotic medication according to provider recommendations for one (Resident #58) of five reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #58 (R58) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included mood disorder due to known physiological condition, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. The modified quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/24/24, reflected R58 had short-term and long-term memory impairments. On 10/01/24 at 1:34 PM, R58 was observed seated on their bed. R58's medical record reflected an order for 25 milligrams (mg) of Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel/antipsychotic medication) to be given in the morning for mood disorder due to known physiological condition. An additional order reflected R58 was to receive 100 mg of Quetiapine Fumarate at bedtime for mood disorder due to known…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was below 5% when two medication errors were observed from a total of 25 opportunities for two residents (Resident #22 and Resident #36) of four reviewed resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. Findings include: Resident #36 (R36) Review of the medical record revealed R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urosepsis (urinary tract infection that leads to sepsis). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/26/24 revealed R36 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Physician's Order dated 10/1/24 revealed ertapenem sodium solution (antibiotic) 1 gram intravenously (IV) every 24 hours for infection, complicated urinary tract infection, for four days. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00143250, MI00143278 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to insure that one resident #1 (R1) was free from significant medications errors out of four residents reviewed for significant medication errors resulting in the potential for adverse physical reactions/outcomes to residents. Findings Included: Resident #1 (R1) Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility 03/17/2023 with diagnoses that included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar type, hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting right dominate side, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), depression, hypertension, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and hypokalemia (lower than normal potassium in bloodstream). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/07/2024, demonstrated R1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen, date mark potential hazardous foods, and maintain the ice machine, resulting in the potential biological contamination of food products, affecting all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 7/18/23 at 8:07 AM, during an inspection of the kitchen, the floor/wall juncture behind the stainless steel coffee table was observed to be soiled with soil and food debris. Additionally, the floor tile grout around the dish machine drain board and underneath the dish machine was observed to be dissolving, leaving gaps for water to accumulate. During an interview on 7/18/23 at 8:23 AM, Dietary Manager L was queried on how often the floor are cleaned and stated, I don't really keep track. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions. (A) PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. (B) Except for cleaning that is necessary due to a spill or other accident, cleaning shall be done during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #64 (R64) Review of the medical record revealed R64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, lymphedema, major depressive disorder, acute kidney failure, hypertension, pain, and cellulitis. Review of the Nursing admission Evaluation dated 8/26/22 revealed R64 had a right heel pressure ulcer. Review of the Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 8/30/22 revealed R64's wound was a diabetic ulcer. Review of the Physician's Progress Note dated 9/22/22 revealed R64 had a right heel diabetic wound. Review of the Physician's Progress Note dated 9/26/22 revealed R64 had a diabetic foot ulcer. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/1/22 revealed R64 had an unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the discharge MDS with an ARD of 9/27/22 revealed R64 had an unstageable pressure ulcer. In an interview on 07/19/23 at 10:19 AM, MDS Coordinator G reported she coded R64's skin based on the admission skin assessment. MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for four (Resident #17, #26, #35 and #38) of 16 reviewed for Care Plans, resulting in inaccurate care plans and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #26 (R26): Review of the medical record reflected R26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of other cerebral artery, diabetes and vascular dementia. The Significant Change in Status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/21/23, reflected R26 had short-term and long-term memory problems and required limited to total assistance of one to two or more people for activities of daily living (ADLs). On 07/20/23 at 7:44 AM, R26 was observed seated in a broda chair, watching TV in her room. R26 was non-verbal when spoken to. A Progress Note by the physician on 4/14/23, reflected, .I was requested to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure current Letters of Guardianship were accessible in the medical record for one (Resident #43) of one reviewed for advance directives, resulting in the potential for medical and treatment decisions to be made by an inactive Guardian. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #43 (R43) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, chronic respiratory failure and tracheostomy status. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], reflected R43 did not walk and required total assistance of one to two or more people for activities of daily living. On [DATE] at 8:02 AM, R43 was observed up, in a broda chair (specialty chair), with his eyes closed. Orthotic devices were in place to both hands, and pillow boots were in place to both feet. A pillow was observed between his knees. R43 was non-verbal. Upon review of R43's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient notice of medicare non-coverage for one (Resident #3) of three reviewed, resulting in Resident #3 not having sufficient time to allow for an appeal Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 (R3) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Medicare A services began on 1/19/23 and ended on 5/2/23. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) revealed request for an immediate appeal should be made as soon as possible, but no later than noon of the day before the effective date indicated above. The effective date listed on R3's NOMNC was 5/2/23. The form was signed by R3 on 5/2/23. In an interview, 07/19/23 at 3:57 PM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported R3's last covered day of Medicare A services was 5/2/23 and R3 received the notice on 5/2/23. NHA A reported the facility was first notified on 5/2/23, via email, that R3's coverage was ending. When asked to provide documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for one resident (#61) of 3 residents reviewed abuse resulting in allegations of abuse not being reported to the State Agency and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported and not thoroughly investigated. Findings Included: Resident #61 (R61) Review of the medical record revealed R61 was admitted to the facility 05/02/2023 with diagnoses that included supraventricular tachycardia, stage 4 kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, anemia (low red blood cell count), morbid obesity, adjustment disorder with anxiety and depression, gastro-esophageal reflux, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), major depression, hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), pain of the right hip, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/08/2023, revealed R61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (cognitively intact) out of 15. R61 was discharged from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00138169 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to shower/bathe one resident (Resident #64) of one reviewed, resulting in the potential for uncleanliness and embarrassment. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 (R64) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, lymphedema, major depressive disorder, acute kidney failure, hypertension, pain, and cellulitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed R64 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required total dependence on one person for bathing. R64's tasks revealed she was to receive a bath Mondays and Fridays. Review of R64's Bath Report revealed R64's first bath was provided on 9/11/22. R64 had been in the facility for 14 days before a shower/bath was documented. The medical record did not reveal any refusals of showers/baths during that time. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure coordination of care with an outside provider for one (Resident #28) of 15 reviewed for quality of care; and 2) identify, assess and monitor a wound for one (Resident #17) of 15 reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the potential for lack of care coordination, worsening wounds and delayed wound healing. Findings include: Resident #28 (R28): Review of the medical record reflected R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included aphasia, tracheostomy status and history of malignant neoplasm of the larynx. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/17/23, reflected R28 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was independent with activities of daily living. On 07/18/23 at 9:07 AM, R28 was observed lying in bed. A Larytube (silicone tube designed to maintain an airway of a laryngectomy) was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding was provided according to physician's orders for one (Resident #43) of one reviewed for tube feeding, resulting in the administration of a tube feeding formula that was not ordered and the potential for weight loss and nutritional deficits. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #43 (R43) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, chronic respiratory failure and tracheostomy status. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/23/23, reflected R43 did not walk and required total assistance of one to two or more people for activities of daily living. On 07/18/23 at 11:21 AM, R43 was observed lying in bed, with the head of the bed elevated. A tube feeding pump was observed to the left bedside, not actively infusing. A bottle of Jevity 1.2 cal tube feeding formula was hanging, dated 7/18, for what appeared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an additional LaryTube (silicone tube designed to maintain an airway of a laryngectomy) was in the room for one (Resident #28) of one reviewed for respiratory care, resulting in the potential for delay in obtaining necessary supplies in an emergency situation. Findings include: Resident #28 (R28): Review of the medical record reflected R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included aphasia, tracheostomy status and history of malignant neoplasm of the larynx. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/17/23, reflected R28 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was independent with activities of daily living. On 07/18/23 at 9:07 AM, R28 was observed lying in bed. A Larytube was in place, secured with a collar/strap. R28 was not able to speak, but she communicated by mouthing words or writing. R28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow pharmacy policy and acceptable practice for maintaining controlled medication for two out of three medication carts resulting in the potential for controlled medication diversion. Finding Included: During observation of D hall 1st medication cart on 07/19/2023 at 11:20 a.m. it was observed that the facility Narcotic Shift Count record was last signed by two nurses on 07/18/2023 at 07:00 p.m. The off going nurse section was signed for the date of 7/19/2023 at 06:30 a.m. The on coming nurse section for the date of 07/19/2023 at 06:30 a.m. was blank. During this observation Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E signed the on coming nurse section for the date of 07/19/2023 at 06:30 a.m. During observation of D hall 2nd medication cart on 07/19/2023 at 11:32 a.m. it was observed that the facility Narcotic Shift Count record was last signed by two nurses on 07/18/2023 at 07:00 p.m. The off going nurse section was signed for the date of 7/19/2023 at 06:30 a.m. The on coming nurse section for the date of 07/19/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered parameters upon the administration of blood pressure medications for one (Resident #56) of five residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and adverse reactions. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 (R56) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included starvation, bipolar disorder, and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/7/23 revealed R56 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 7/18/23 at 8:23 AM, R56 was observed lying in bed. Review of the physician's order dated 6/2/23 revealed an order for metoprolol 25 mg by mouth in the morning for hypertension (high blood pressure). Hold for systolic blood pressure less than 110 or heartrate less than 60. This order started on 6/3/23 and ended 7/14/23. Review of the Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide clinical justification for the use of psychotropic for two residents (#26,#38) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medication. Findings Included: Resident #38 (R38) Review of the medical record revealed R38 was admitted to the facility 11/17/2022 with diagnoses that included stage 4 pressure ulcer to right buttock, pressure ulcer of right upper back, stage 4 pressure ulcer of left elbow unstageable stage 2 pressure ulcer of sacral region, anemia (low red blood cells in blood), severe protein calorie malnutrition, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), cervical disc displacement at cervical 5 through cervical 6 level, hypotension, major depression, migraines, post-traumatic stress disorder, bradycardia (low heart rate), chronic pain, anxiety disorder, colostomy, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% when two medication errors were observed from a total of 25 opportunities for one resident (Resident #49) of six residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 8% and the potential for adverse reactions/side effects. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 (R49) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pseudobulbar affect and anxiety. On 7/19/23 at 7:27 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was observed prepared and administered medications to R49 which included a Nuedexta 20-10 milligram (mg) tablet and a hydroxyzine pamoate 25 mg tablet. R49 took the medications by mouth. Review of the physician's order dated 6/15/23 revealed hydroxyzine (Vistaril) was ordered to administer through R49's feeding tube. The physician's order dated 6/21/23 revealed Nuedexta was ordered to administer through R49's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to track and provide the pneumococcal vaccination timely for one (Resident # 13) of five residents reviewed for immunizations, resulting in the potential for incomplete vaccination, and the potential for serious illness and complications from pneumococcal disease. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #13 (R13) was readmitted to facility 8/16/2021 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, and Vascular Dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/26/23 revealed that R13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 14 (cognitively intact). Section O of the same MDS indicated that R13 received the Influenza Vaccination on 10/28/2022 and that R13's Pneumococcal Vaccine was up to date. Review of the paperwork titled Letters of Guardianship, scanned into R13's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a requested COVID-19 bivalent booster in a timely manner for one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for immunizations, resulting in an increased risk for infection, and the potential spread of COVID-19 infection to other residents, staff, and visitors. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #7 (R7) was admitted to facility 4/12/23 with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Parkinson's Disease, and unspecified heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/30/23 revealed that R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care (DPOA-HC) paperwork indicated that R7 named his son as DPOA-HC, and to make decisions for R7, when he was no longer able to make his own decisions. Review of R7's prior vaccination history contained within Immunization tab reflected that R7 had received a COVID 19 vaccination on 1/30/21 and 2/27/21 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-12-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to update the daily staff posting with a current facility census of 75 residents. Findings include: Upon initial entry to the facility at 12/01/2025 at 9:12 AM, the daily staffing post was observed with a last completed date of 11/19/25. On 12/01/2025 at 3:15 PM, the same daily staffing post was observed with the date of 11/19/25. On 12/02/2025 at 7:55 AM, the same daily staffing posting dated 11/19/25 was observed. In an interview on 12/03/2025 at 10:44 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant H stated that she was responsible for the daily staffing posting, however, had been off of work and thought the daily staffing posting had been delegated to another staff member. CNA H was not able to ascertain why the daily staffing post was not updated.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Medilodge of FarmingtonFarmington, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand BlancGrand Blanc, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of HowellHowell, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MarshallMarshall, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Montrose IncMontrose, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MunisingMunising, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Sault Ste. MarieSault Ste. Marie, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of SouthfieldSouthfield, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of WestwoodKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge at the ShoreGrand Haven, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Capital AreaLansing, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of CheboyganCheboygan, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of East LansingEast Lansing, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of FrankenmuthFrankenmuth, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of GTCTraverse City, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of KalamazooKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of LudingtonLudington, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of St. ClairEast China, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Sterling HeightsSterling Heights, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Campus AreaEast Lansing, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of HillmanHillman, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivingstonHowell, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivoniaLivonia, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Mt. PleasantMt. Pleasant, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of PortagePortage, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ShorelineSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Tawas CityTawas City, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of TaylorTaylor, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ZeelandZeeland, MI 3 of 5The Lodge at TaylorTaylor, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of GaylordGaylord, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of HollandHolland, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LeelanauSuttons Bay, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of MilfordMilford, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of OkemosOkemos, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of RichmondRichmond, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of Traverse CityTraverse City, MI 5 of 5Medilodge of AlpenaAlpena, MI

Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARK OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/02/2015
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/02/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/02/2015
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/02/2015
NOBLE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$930K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 6%Other / private 24%

This home reported $930K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$368per resident / day
operating cost
$11,181per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$339per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235285. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next