Medilodge of Portage

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 106.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.25 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2968884, #3004071, and #3000720Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident received appropriate care for skin breakdown and pressure ulcer development in 2 of 3 residents (Resident #119 and Resident #5) reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in Resident #119 developing a pressure ulcer infection and Resident #5 developing pressure ulcers.Findings include:Resident #119 Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #119 was a male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: pressure ulcer of the sacral region (the lower part of the back, base of the spine just above the buttock) stage 4 (most severe form of the pressure ulcer, characterized by a deep, open wound that extends through the skin, underlying tissue, muscle, and bone), sepsis (a life-threatening condition caused by the body's extreme response to an infection), and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). In an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2709386.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision with hot liquids for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and safety resulting in Resident #101 receiving a second degree burn (causes pain and damages the outer and second layer of the skin) on her left arm on 12/27/2025 and a burn on her left hand on 12/30/2025 and the fear of receiving another burn. Findings include:Resident #101 (R101)Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R101 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (serious stroke where bleeding occurs inside the brain), flaccid (lacking firmness, strength or stiffness; limp and flabby) hemiplegia (paralysis of one side) affecting left dominant side, chronic pain and depression. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) on 1/12/2026 reflected a score of 13 out of 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS). DPS 1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and adequate safety measures for one resident (R9) of 22 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in a fall with injury and the potential of additional falls with injuries. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R9 scored 2/15 on her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired, experienced bowel/bladder incontinence. The resident had no impairment in her arms or legs, high-risk medications included antianxiety, antidepressant and sedative medications. Section J1900- two or more falls since admission. Review of R9's Diagnoses included dementia, diastolic congestive heart failure, hypertension, anxiety, major depressive disorder recurrent mild, urinary tract infection (1/15/2024), repeated falls (1/9/2024), pain in left leg, developmental disorders of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's skin integrity, and update interventions to prevent the development and worsening of a medical device related pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #100) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure wounds, resulting in Resident #100 developing unstageable/non-healing pressure ulcers after a cast like boot (for leg fracture) had not been removed for assessment of skin integrity by nursing staff in accordance with physicians orders. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic respiratory failure. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100, with a reference date of 11/6/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 which indicated Resident #100 was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #100's MDS assessment revealed Resident #100 was a 2 person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2790303 & 2968884.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely response to call lights to meet resident needs in 4 of 5 residents (Resident #8, #14, #58, & #119) reviewed for dignity, and 6 of 13 residents from the confidential group interview, resulting in long call light wait times for incontinence care, frustration, and impaired self-worth.Findings include:Resident #8 Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #8 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, obstructive lung disease, morbid obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression, and anxiety. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #8, with a reference date of 3/6/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a total possible score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #8 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. In an interview on 5/12/26 at 9:49 AM, Resident #8 reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1.) ensure the safety of residents to prevent falls, 2) provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls, and 3.) utilize footrests for wheelchair transport in 3 of 3 residents (Resident #40, #26, and #95) reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in Resident #40 having 22 falls over 2 months, Resident #40 and #95 being transferred without wheelchair footrests, and Resident #26 being improperly transferred. This deficient practice placed all 3 residents at risk for injury.Findings include: Resident #40: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #40 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, history of falling, dementia, insomnia, and kidney disease stage 3. Review of the medical record reviewed Resident #40 had 22 falls in two months between 3/11/26 and 5/12/26. Most of the falls indicated the root cause was the resident self-transferred and frequently needed toileting. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living.Findings Include:On 5/12/26 at 11:01 AM, observation of the D hall closet containing resident slings, found that the slings were hung up by one side on the hangers and left to drag onto the floor. When asked if this is how the slings are normally kept, Housekeeping Manager M stated that it happens all the time and that staff need to hang both sides of the sling up to keep it off the floor. On 5/13/26 at 9:47 AM, observation of the love seat and chair, located on the far side of the dining room, were found with increased accumulation of debris, sand, wrappers, paper trash and a yellow push pin. Further review of the chair found a sheet of paper with resident's names and rooms numbers for the D hall and an intact plastic vile of Albuterol Sulfate. On 5/13/26 at 10:15 AM, an interview with Housekeeping Manager M found that the furniture in the dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities designed to support the psychosocial well-being of 1 of 1 resident (R65) reviewed for activities, resulting in a potential for feelings of social isolation, loneliness, boredom, and depressed mood.Findings include:Review of R65's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident was unable to complete the BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) with a score of 99. Section B- Hearing, Speech, and Vision, stated R65 was absent of spoken words and rarely/never understood. Section GG-Functional Abilities revealed R65 was dependent on staff to provide ADLs (activities of daily living) including positioning and sensory stimulation. Section I-Active Diagnoses indicated R65's active diagnoses included stroke and traumatic brain injury.Review of R65's Care Plan, At Risk for Altered Activity Patterns/Pursuits related to cerebral infarction was dated 9/22/2023. The goal for the resident was revised on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter (tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) was maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 (Resident #122) of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in the urinary catheter bag lying on the floor creating an opportunity for contamination and the potential for urinary tract infection. Findings include: Review of a current Care Plan for Resident #122 reflected a need for an indwelling catheter related to urine retention with interventions to change catheter and drainage system as clinically indicated per order(s). Observe for signs/symptoms of obstruction (leakage, increased sediment, etc.), infection, or if closed system was compromised.Irrigate foley catheter as indicated .Maintain drainage bag below the bladder level .Privacy cover to catheter drainage bag. During an observation on 05/12/2026 at 10:12 AM, outside of Resident #122's door was a sign for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Resident #122 was observed seated in his wheelchair located in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen as ordered in 1 resident of 1 resident (R9) reviewed for oxygen administration, resulting in the potential of respiratory health complications including exacerbation of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and/or retention of carbon dioxide (gas produced by cellular respiration in humans).Findings include:According to R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], she was cognitively impaired indicated by a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 8/15. Section GG-Functional Abilities indicated R9 was dependent on staff for transferring and mobility. Section I-Active Diagnoses stated debility due to cardiorespiratory conditions that included heart failure, respiratory failure with hypercapnia, Section O-indicated R9 used oxygen therapy continuously while a resident in the facility. Review of R9's Order Summary dated 3/29/2023, indicated oxygen rate was ordered to run at 2.5 lpm (liters per minute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to (1) ensure medications labeled/dated for 1 resident of 1 resident (R84) reviewed for medication labeling/dating, (2) ensure medications were stored in a secure manner in 2 of 2 treatment carts and 1 medication room/refrigerator (A Hall), resulting in the potential for residents to receive expired medications with altered potency and decreased efficacy, and residents, visitors, and/or staff access the medications, including narcotics, in the facility. Findings include: According to R84's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) was 13/15 (cognitively intact). Section I-Active Diagnoses stated medically complex conditions including heart failure, arthritis (painful joints), non-Alzheimer's dementia (loss of memory), and bipolar disorder (recurring shifts in mood). During an observation, interview, and record review on 5/12/26 at 11:04 AM, R84 was awake in her bed. On a dresser next to R84's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records for 1 (Resident #77) of 21 residents reviewed for accurate medical records, resulting in an inaccurate representation of Resident #77's current care needs and the potential for unmet care needs.Findings include:Resident #77Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #77 was a female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnosis which included: syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH- a condition in which excessive antidiuretic hormone causes water retention and low blood sodium).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #77, with a reference date of 4/25/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #77 was cognitively intact.On 5/12/26 at 9:15 AM, Resident #77 was in her room, sitting at the bedside, with her breakfast tray in front of her. Noted on the meal tray ticket present on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2709386.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of neglect (a hot liquid burn) for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents/safety when Resident #101 did not have appropriate interventions in place based on an assessment related to hot liquid spills and did not receive the help she needed resulting in a second burn causing Resident #101 pain, distress and fear of getting burned again. Findings include:Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R101 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (serious stroke where bleeding occurs inside the brain and flaccid (lacking firmness, strength or stiffness; limp and flabby) hemiplegia (paralysis of one side) affecting left dominant side. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) on 1/12/2026 reflected a score of 13 out of 15 which indicated R101…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: 2575789, 2567564Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident sexual abuse in 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #102) reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for a decline in mental and psychosocial well-being.Findings include: Resident #102: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, reduced mobility, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side, and anxiety. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #102, with a reference date of 6/20/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident #102 was cognitively intact. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #102, revised on 3/19/2025, revealed the focus, .Resident has an impaired mood/psychiatric status related to major depressive do (disorder), anxiety. Has depression…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$35,317 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $19,724 — penalty dated 2024-02-29
• $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-12-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $591K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI