Medilodge of Tawas City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 64% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 74.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident #9 and Resident #72) were adequately supervised to prevent falls out of 5 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the likelihood of a fear of falling, skin tears, head injuries with hospitalization and repeated individual falls. Resident #9: Record review of the facility provided CMS-802 'Resident Matrix' identified Resident #9 as had a fall with injury. An observation and interview on 09/10/2025 at 10:19 AM with Resident #9 revealed that she was laying on the top of her bed with the room partition/privacy curtain pulled so that the resident could not be observed from the doorway of the room. Resident #9 stated that she did have a fall at her closet but could not recall when the fall had occurred. Resident #9 stated that she did have a broken arm from the fall and tailbone pain. identified a fall with major injury and resident stated that she had a fall at her closet. In an observation on 09/11/2025 at 10:34 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program, encompassing accurate outcome and process surveillance, accurate data collection/documentation/analysis, failure to ensure readily accessible hand hygiene supplies/equipment, and appropriate use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for transmission-based isolation precautions, resulting in a lack of accurate and comprehensive infection control tracking, surveillance and data monitoring/analysis, a lack of hand hygiene completion, PPE use, and the likelihood for the spread of microorganisms and illness to all 73 facility residents.Findings include: Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) Resident #1 On 9/10/25 10:06 AM, a sign was noted outside of Resident #1's room specifying the Resident had Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in place. CNA T was asked why Resident #1 had EBP and replied, Has tube feeding. CNA T was observed entering the Resident's room. Resident #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive Antibiotic Stewardship Program including documentation and treatment for three residents (#31, #35, and #44) of three residents reviewed for antimicrobial treatment and the potential to affect all facility residents by means of unnecessary and inappropriate antibiotic and antimicrobial medication utilization, antibiotic resistance, and ongoing infection.Findings include:An interview and review of facility Infection Control (IC) and antibiotic utilization data was completed on 9/12/25 at 12:24 PM with IC Registered Nurse (RN) C. When queried what criteria the facility utilizes for antibiotic use and infections, IC RN C replied, McGeer (standardized criteria providing guidelines for antibiotic use). A review of the facility lC documentation for October 2024 was completed. The Monthly line listing documentation provided did not specify if the infection being treated with an antimicrobial medication met McGeer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent facility-acquired urinary infections for 4 residents' (#31, # 35, #44, #70) of 4 sampled residents, resulting in likelihood for recurrent urinary tract infections with prolonged illness or hospitalization and antibiotic therapy.Findings include: Resident #31:Observation, interview and record on 9/10/2025 at 10:10 AM estimated of Resident #31 during the initial screening process of the annual recertification survey the resident was verbal with confusion and could not recall having a urinary tract infection. Record review of Resident #31's 8/6/2025 Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified the resident with a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMs) of 4 out of 15, severe cognitively impaired. Record review on 09/10/2025 at 2:34 PM of Resident #31's urology office visit note dated 7/9/2025 noted hematuria (blood in urine) and urinary tract infection. Ordered Macrobid 100mg capsule oral, one tablet twice daily for 30 capsules.Record review on 09/10/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for 2 residents (Resident #30 and Resident #33) of 18 residents reviewed for medications left in rooms, resulting in the potential for ingestion of medications. Findings include: Resident #30: On 9/10/25 at 10:53 AM, Resident #30 was observed sitting in a chair on the left side of their bed and an interview was completed. During the interview, a clear cup containing medication pills was observed sitting on a bedside dresser table next to a clear plastic cup of water on the right side of the Resident's bed. The medication cup contained several different size and colored pills. The number of pills in the cup was unable to be accurately counted due to the way the pills were in the cup. When queried regarding the medications, Resident #30 revealed the nurse had left them there for them to take. When asked if the nursing staff always leave their medications in their room, Resident #30 replied some nurses do and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update/revise individualized, person-centered care plans to reflect changing care needs for 1 resident (Resident #9), of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: Resident #9: Record review of the facility provided CMS-802 'Resident Matrix' identified Resident #9 as had a fall with injury. In an observation and interview on 09/10/2025 at 10:19 AM with Resident #9 revealed that she was laying on the top of her bed with the room partition/privacy curtain pulled so that the resident could not be observed from the doorway of the room. Resident #9 stated that she did have a fall at her closet but could not recall when the fall had occurred. Resident #9 stated that she did have a broken arm from the fall and tailbone pain. identified a fall with major injury and resident stated that she had a fall at her closet. Observation on 09/11/2025 at 10:34 AM of Resident #9 was noted to be lying in bed with the room partition curtain pulled between beds and the resident was not able to be seen from the hallway.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify skin breakdown for three residents (#3, #13, #70) resulting in the lack of implementation of interventions to prevent skin injury, the worsening of skin injuries, pain, discomfort, and the likelihood of prolonged illness or hospitalization.Findings include: Resident #3:An observation and interview on 09/11/2025 at 8:38 AM of Resident 3 revealed that there were sore spots to the resident's buttocks area and the nurses apply a cream to the area and take photos sometimes. During the survey the surveyor observed Resident #3 to be non-ambulatory related to Parkinson's disease and was able to self-propel wheelchair to the dining room. Resident #3 stated that he does use a WC for ambulation and does spend a lot of time in bed. Observed an air mattress in place to the bed. Resident #3 stated that he was the president of the resident council for residents' concerns and that he had no issues or concerns with the facility. Record review of Resident #3's 8/28/2025 Moisture associated Skin Damage (MASD) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line care was provided, per professional standards of practice, for one resident (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed, resulting in a lack of sterile technique during dressing change and a lack of accurate measurement of arm circumference. Findings include:Resident #2:On 9/10/25 at 10:14 AM, A Contact Precaution sign was observed on Resident #2's room door. Activity Aide S was observed in the hallway near the Resident's room. When asked if they knew the why Resident #2 had Contact Precautions in place, Activity Aide S stated, No. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) T was observed walking down the hall and was asked if they knew why Resident #2 had contact precautions in place and replied, (Resident #2) has a central line (PICC). When asked if the Resident had an infection, CNA T replied, No. Record review revealed Resident #2 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and oxygen therapy administration tubing was changed per Health Care Provider's (HCP) order for one resident (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed.Findings include:Resident #2:On 9/10/25 at 10:14 AM, A Contact Precaution sign was observed on Resident #2's room door. The Resident's door was open and they were laying in bed, on their back with their eyes closed. Resident #2 had supplement oxygen in place via nasal cannula (NC). Activity Aide S and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) T were observed in the hallway. When asked the reason Resident #2 had contact precautions in place, Activity Aide S verbalized they did not know and CNA T stated, (Resident #2) has a central line (PICC). When asked if the Resident had an infection, CNA T replied, No. On 9/11/25 at 8:20 AM, Resident #2 was observed in their room, sitting on the edge of their bed. The Resident's NC prongs (part of the tubing that oxygen comes out of and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the appropriate backflow prevention was installed on cross connections. This deficient practice increases the likelihood of contamination of the water supply due to a backflow event, potentially affecting all residents, staff, and visitors who consume water at the facility.Findings include: On 09/10/2025 at 10:30AM during the kitchen tour, observed overhead spray nozzle sitting below the flood rim in the garbage disposal. During interview at this time with Certified Dietary Manager G, she stated she was just using it and forgot to put it back on the hook. On 09/10/2025 1:30PM - 2:30PM during interview with Regional Maintenance I, he stated they are in the process of replacing the sink and the overhead spray nozzle in the kitchen and proceeded to show the order for the parts. On 09/10/2025 between 1:30PM - 2:25PM observed a hose with a spray nozzle attached downstream of a hose bib atmospheric vacuum breaker on the outside spigot located near the front of the building. At this time, Regional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number 2580560.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of care were given (assess, monitor and promptly report to the physician a change of condition regarding surgical wounds) and follow the care plan for one resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for professional standards of care resulting in sepsis, 2 surgeries (debridement's of sternum and left leg surgical wounds), antibiotics, and hospitalization stay.Findings Include:Resident #101:Based on Face Sheet, Minimum Data Set (MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #101 was [AGE] years old, fully alert and able to make her own healthcare decisions and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living/ADL's. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] post open heart surgery, for rehabilitation and was discharged to the local hospital for shortness of breath and dehiscence (opening of surgical wound) of 2 post-surgical wounds (sternum and left lower leg) on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $414K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI