No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Medilodge of Cass City

4782 Hospital Drive, Cass City, MI 48726 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (989) 872-2174 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (989) 872-2174 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
6190 Hospital Dr · (989) 912-6061 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Erla's0.4 mi
6233 Church St · (989) 872-2191 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rotary Park Cass City Mi · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.6%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.1%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.4%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.7%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.2%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.2%79.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission10.6%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%11.7%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.791.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.401.641.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 75% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.3%CMS range 26.1–48.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 8.5–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.0–14.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
35.9%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 66.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-28)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of the premise's plumbing. Findings include: On 08/26/2025 at approximately 1:00-1:30PM during the environmental tour with the Director of Maintenance D observed drain line to water softener sitting inside drain located in B hall. 08/26/2025 at approximately 1:00-1:30PM conducted interview with Director of Maintenance D on flushing water lines, he stated that the boiler is flushed, and it's done every month. On 08/26/2025 at approximately 1:00-2:00PM record review of legionella results showed legionella positive in C utility room, result was 0.8 CFU/mL on 3/14/25. When water was retested, legionella test results was negative on 5/15/25 for C utility hall. On 08/27/2025 at approximately 8:30-9:00AM during the housekeeping tour with the Housekeeping Manager E, observed a box with supplies stacked inside the basin of the utility sink in the janitor's closet between C and D hallways. When questioned on how often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one resident (R31) of 16 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans, resulting in the absence of a diabetic management care plan and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include:R31 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, history of falling and delusional disorders. On 08/27/25 at 9:00AM, record review of the comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that R31 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. On 08/27/25 at 10:30AM, record review revealed an order for Lyumjev (Insulin) 2 units, subcutaneous prior to meals, hold if blood sugar (BS) is less than 120, call physician if more than 300, it is dated 10/17/24. On 08/27/25 at 10:33AM, record review of care plans revealed there was no care plan present for diabetic care of R31. On 08/28/2025 at 10:19AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate measures were in place, assessed for effectiveness and the resident was monitored to prevent constipation for one resident (Resident #56) of 1 resident reviewed for constipation, resulting in Resident #56 experiencing discomfort, restlessness and adverse reactions after not having a bowel movement for 8 days. Findings include: Change of Condition Resident #56 A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], 4/4/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Heart disease, Epilepsy, dysphasia, Multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, high blood pressure, muscle weakness, depression, constipation and acute bladder inflammation with bleeding (8/24/2025). The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a memory problem and needed assistance with care. On 8/26/2025 at 11:03 AM, Resident #56 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive bowel elimination care plan, ensure documented assessments and changes for a colostomy (an opening in the abdomen through which stool from the colon can be discharged into a bag) for one resident (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for colostomy (ostomy), resulting in a lack of overall documentation of the colostomy care with the likelihood of signs and symptoms of complications going unnoticed. Findings include: On 8/27/2025, at 8:15 AM, CNA A offered that when the ostomy bag needs changed, they let the nurses know and the nurses change it. On 8/27/2025, at 9:30 AM, a record review of Resident #38's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Mild Intellectual Disabilities, Alzheimer's disease and Dementia. Resident #38 required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living. According to the most recent accepted quarterly Minimal Data set assessment revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dialysis communication forms were completed and included pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessments and accurate identification of the dialysis access site for one resident (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis services, resulting in the potential for a decline in condition and the inability for a prompt response to care needs.Findings include: Dialysis Resident #5 On 8/26/2025 at 9:33 AM, Resident #5 was observed in his room sitting in a wheelchair. He said he was getting ready to leave for dialysis. He said he goes on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday and leaves the facility about 9:00 AM. The resident showed his dialysis access site on his right chest. The dressing over the site was dated 8/20/25 and he said they would change it at the dialysis center. A record review of the Face sheet and electronic medical record, indicated Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Diabetes, end stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed follow physician-ordered medication administration parameters for two residents (R31, R49) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in medications being administered outside of parameters. Findings include: Resident #49: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment for Resident #49 revealed an admission to the facility on 5/21/2024 with diagnoses: Diabetes, Heart failure, Cardiac pacemaker, history of repeated falls, COPD, high blood pressure, Dementia, weakness, hypothyroidism, depression, anxiety, peripheral vascular disease, arthritis and pain. The resident has a memory problem with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 3/15 and needs assistance with care. A review of the physician orders for Resident #49 identified the following: Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet: Give 50 mg by mouth two times a day for CHF (congestive heart failure), Hold dose if: SBP (systolic blood pressure/top number)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize processes and procedures to ensure pharmacological oversight of controlled and narcotic medications, including accurate electronic order entry, monitoring and accountability of receipt, dispensing, administration, and disposal in two of three medication carts and one of medication rooms reviewed. This deficiency resulted in expired medications as well as inaccurate controlled and narcotic medication reconciliation for five residents (Resident #3, Resident #11, Resident #31, Resident #50, and Resident #503) and the likelihood for additional medication errors, inappropriate medication use and administration, and diversion which has the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A tour and narcotic medication reconciliation/count of the C-Hall medication cart was completed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L on 8/28/24 at 12:50 PM. The following items were identified during the narcotic medication reconciliation/count: - Vimpat (controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for labeling, storage, and disposition of medications and medical supplies in three (A, B, and C Hall) of four medication carts, one of one medication room, and one closet containing medications and medical supplies resulting in open and undated medications, medications and medical supplies being stored in an unlocked closet, and the likelihood for unauthorized access to medications and medical supplies, and Residents to receive expired medications with altered potency and efficacy. Findings include: A tour of the C-Hall medication cart was completed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L on 8/28/24 at 12:50 PM. The following items were present in the medication cart: - Trelegy Ellipta (prescription inhaler used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma) 100 mcg (micrograms)/62.5 mcg/25 mcg for Resident #18. The medication was dated as Opened 7/5/24 and included the instructions, Discard 6 weeks after opening. When queried when the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified and respectful treatment for one resident (Resident #28) of two residents reviewed, resulting in staff speaking to Resident #28 in an undignified and belittling manner and the resident's verbalization of feelings of frustration and discontentment. Findings include: Resident #28: On 8/28/24 at 9:27 AM, Resident #28 was observed in their room. The Resident was in bed, positioned on their back. Upon entering the room, the room temperature was immediately noted to be uncomfortably hot and humid. A fan was present in the room, but an air conditioning unit was not present in the window. An interview was completed at this time. When queried how they were treated by facility staff, Resident #28 replied that some staff don't give good care. Resident #28 was asked what they meant and stated, (They) act like it is a burden to provide care and assist them. Resident #28 verbalized frustration and indicated they would prefer to be able to do things…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of hygiene and daily care for two residents (Resident #28, and Resident #48) of four residents reviewed, resulting in unkept and long toenails, foul odors, and exposed, visible stool on the bedside commode in Resident #48's room. Findings include: Resident #28: On 8/28/24 at 9:27 AM, Resident #28 was observed in their room. The Resident was in bed, positioned on their back with their toothbrush in place on the overbed table in front of the Resident. Upon entering the room, the room temperature was immediately noted to be uncomfortably hot and humid. A fan was present in the room, but there was not an air conditioning unit in the window. An uncovered, pink colored bedpan was observed sitting on top of the garbage can next to the Resident's bed. An interview was completed at this time. When queried regarding the level of assistance they need for transfers and ambulating, Resident #28 revealed staff transfer them using a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent the development of three (one Stage IV and two unstageable) pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #31), resulting in, Resident #31 developing a right ankle unstageable wound, a left ankle unstageable wound and a Stage IV coccyx wound and delayed wound healing. Findings include: Resident #31: On 8/27/2024 at 10:55 AM, Resident #31 was observed sitting in the wheelchair after staff had completed morning cares. The resident was asked if she had any wounds on her body and she pointed to her coccyx area and stated it was painful. On 8/27/2024 at approximately 1:00 PM, a review was completed of Resident #31's medical record and it revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, Diabetes, Dementia, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4, Pressure Ulcer of left ankle and Pressure Ulcer of right ankle, Schizophrenia, Anxiety and Major Depressive Disorder. Further review revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure a thorough investigation, accurate documentation, and implementation of meaningful interventions for fall prevention for two residents (Resident #16 and Resident #23) of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a lack of accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) documentation, comprehensive analysis of falls, a lack of updated and meaningful interventions to prevent falls, and the likelihood of unnecessary pain and injury. Findings include: Resident #16: On 08/28/24 at 9:01 AM, Resident #16 was not in their room. Resident #16's bed was observed to have bilateral, half-length side rails in place. The side rails were very loose and moved several inches with pressure. At 10:37 AM on 8/28/24, Resident #16 was not in their room. Record review revealed Resident #16 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure positioning and follow care-planned interventions during enteral feeding for two residents (Resident #19, Resident #50) of two residents reviewed for enteral feeding assistance, resulting in the likelihood of aspiration and/or enteral tube malfunction. Findings include: Resident #19: On 8/27/24, at 10:51 AM, Resident #19 was resting in bed scooted down slightly sideways in their bed which was approximately 20 degrees. Their tube feeding was not hooked up. They did not have on an abdominal binder. On 8/27/24, at 12:01 PM, Resident #19 was in the same position in their bed. Their tube feeding was hooked up and running. They did not have on an abdominal binder. On 8/27/24, at 3:30 PM, a review of Resident #19's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included laceration of the cerebellum with loss of consciousness, impaired gastrointestinal status requiring enteral feeding and subdural hemorrhage.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and care plan Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) masks appropriately, administer oxygen per physicians' orders and provide appropriate water for the CPAP machine for three residents (Resident #22, Resident #23, Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for Oxygen/CPAP use, resulting in the likelihood of infection and abnormal oxygen levels. Findings include: Resident #22: On 8/27/24, at 8:38 AM, Resident #22's CPAP mask was face down uncovered resting on their nightstand. On 8/27/24, at 3:15 PM, a record review of Resident #22's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Diabetes Mellitus and Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage. A review of the Physician orders revealed CPAP 14/5 Rate . at bedtime . Start Date 7/30/2024 . A review of the care plan revealed no care plan for the CPAP machine and need. Resident #67: On 8/27/24, at 8:38 AM, Resident #67's CPAP mask…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5% when three medication errors were observed from a total of 25 opportunities for three residents (Resident #56, Resident #501, and Resident #503) of five residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 12% and the potential for the risk of adverse medication effects and decreased medication efficacy. Findings include: Resident #56: On 8/28/24 at 12:45 PM, medication pass observation for Resident #56 was completed with Unit Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L. LPN L prepared Valporic Acid (Depakote- used to treat seizures and as a mood stabilizer) oral solution (liquid) 250 milligram (mg)/5 milliliter (mL) for administration to the Resident. The ordered dose was 20 mL (1000 mg). LPN L was observed holding the medication cup in their hand and while dispensing the liquid Valporic Acid into the cup. LPN L then set the medication cup on the top of the medication cart. LPN L did not confirm the accuracy of the amount of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and ensure proper Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) (gown, gloves) for one resident (Resident #19), resulting in the likelihood of contamination during wound care and incontinence care and the spread of infection. Findings include: Resident #19: On 8/27/24, at 3:30 PM, a review of Resident #19's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included laceration of the cerebellum with loss of consciousness, impaired gastrointestinal status requiring enteral feeding and subdural hemorrhage. Resident #19 required extensive assistance and had severely impaired cognition. A review of Physicians orders revealed an order for . Enhanced barrier precautions . Active Start Date 8/1/2024 . On 8/29/24, at 10:01 AM, an observation along with CNA P and CNA O of Resident #19's skin who required incontinence care. CNA O assisted with incontinence care with gloved hands. With the same gloved hands, CNA O entered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00134661 and MI00142794. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a functional call light in a timely manner for two residents (Resident #9, Resident #30), resulting in delayed staff response to the residents' needs and feelings of frustration and worry. Findings include: Resident #9: On 8/27/24, at 11:23 AM, Resident #9 was resting in bed. There was an approximate 4-inch by 6-inch hole in the wall where the call device was once housed. Resident #9 stated it had been broken for about 4 days and that they were given a handheld bell to ring for help. Resident #9 rang the bell as loud as they could for 10 seconds. No staff came. Resident #9 offered that they ring it but often wait for long periods of time as much as an hour. The television (TV) in the room was audibly loud. The roommate (Resident #30) was resting with their eyes closed and the only remote to the TV was on their nightstand. Resident #9 rang the handheld bell again for 15 seconds with no staff response. On 8/27/24, at 11:29 AM, There were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement infection control practices related to COVID-19 (COVID) for four residents (#2, #3, #4, #5) of 5 residents sampled resulting in missing Transmission Based Precaution (TBP) orders for residents positive with COVID, missing COVID positive care plans, missing trash cans for contaminated personal protective equipment (PPE), lack of PPE outside of the rooms and the potential for spreading COVID in the facility. Findings include: On 02/28/24 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed one large trash can outside of room B5/#2 for the whole hallway and missing trash cans outside of resident rooms (B7/#3, B9/#4, B13/#5) on transmission based precautions (TBP) for COVID. Observation revealed signs on the room doors that indicated anyone entering should wear gloves, a gown, a mask and a face shield. On 02/28/24 at 10:05 AM, RN 'A' was interviewed about the lack of trash cans outside of the rooms and where would you place wrappers that PPE came in and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00142937. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to justify the use of a PRN/as needed antianxiety medication and document rationale for prolonged PRN use for one resident (#1), resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and adverse effects. Findings Include: A review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 revealed an admission into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Schizophrenia, heart failure, hypertension, Systemic Lupus (an autoimmune disorder), anxiety, depression, pathological dislocation of left hip (present on admission), and hypothyroidism. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 revealing moderate cognitive loss. The resident needed some assistance with all care and was unable to walk. An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON A on 2/28/2024 at 9:54 AM, revealed Resident #1 had several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure safe and sanitary food storage, sanitary conditions in the kitchen, and ensure kitchen equipment was maintained and inspected, resulting in the potential for equipment malfunction, injury, and foodborne illness for all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: A tour of the facility kitchen began on 9/12/23 at 10:14 AM with Dietary Manager L. During the tour, the following items were identified in the Egg Fridge: - A container of diced tomatoes labeled as expired: 9/11. When asked, Dietary Manager L indicated the tomatoes should not be in the fridge and proceeded to remove them. - Uncovered eggs were observed sitting in an open cardboard egg holder on the bottom shelf. No date was present on the eggs. The cardboard egg holder was noted to have empty egg slots which had visible yellow colored egg yolk and semi clear colored egg white in the bottom. When queried why the eggs were sitting uncovered in the fridge, Manager L…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to curate an Activities Program that met the interest of facility residents and consistent weekend programming for residents, resulting in an activities program being monotonous, lacking originality, weekend programming since April 2023 not consistently being conducted and residents expressing feelings of frustrations, discontentment, and unimportance. Findings include: On 9/13/2023 at 9:30 AM, Resident Council was held with seven facility residents, and they expressed their great displeasure with the activity program and past Activity Director X. They had multiple complaints regarding the program and iterated they informed upper management and floor staff of their concerns related to the program and poor disposition of the Activity Director, but it was not addressed timely. The residents shared the following: -Activities ran by the Activity Director X were not started timely. She would move the time back but still sit in the office at the start of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive Infection Control (IC) program including outcome and process surveillance, data analysis and reporting for all infections, and environmental cleaning/sanitization processes/procedures for all 48 facility residents. This deficient practice resulted in of lack of surveillance for potential infections and infections not requiring antimicrobial therapy, incomplete and inaccurate infection analysis, lack of thorough tracking and surveillance of employee illness, lack of comprehensive environmental surveillance, drain fly infestation, and the likelihood for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for all residents. Findings Include: A review of facility provided Infection Control (IC) line listing for 2023 revealed the line listings provided for review did not include the Resident's name, signs and symptoms of infection, antibiotic start date (if applicable),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the facility residents, resulting in (1) ineffective maintenance of residents' rooms (drywall exposed, unfinished drywalling projects, holes/gaps in walls,; (2) infestation of sewer flies, (3) facility tracking of pest/rodents, and (4) 10-month delay of B-Hall shower room repair. Findings Include: During initial tour on 9/12/2023, the following was observed in resident rooms: Room D2: Behind the resident's headboard was a large white area that appeared to be drywall that had been fixed but never painted. The area was not smooth but rough. Room D7: On the right- hand side of the wall, near the heat register were 3-4 gaps in the wall where the drywall met the baseboard. Across the top of the call light box was a 3-4-inch gap in the drywall. On the left side of the room (by the bathroom) were two large holes and the resident was unsure what they were from. Room D9: On the left-hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation has Two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS). DPS One: Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter drainage bags were maintained in a dignified manner for one resident (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed, resulting in a lack of dignity covering for an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag. Findings include: Resident #24: On 9/12/23 at 11:53 AM, Resident #24 was observed in their room. There was a noticeable lack of light, noise, and stimulation in the room. The Resident's bed was flat, and they were observed flat on their back with their eyes open staring up at the ceiling. An indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was observed on the side of the bed. The drainage bag was exposed and not contained in a dignity bag and/or with a dignity covering. When queried how long they had had the catheter, Resident #24 indicated it had been in place for quite a while but was unable to provide a specific date. When queried regarding staff assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for two residents (Resident #27, Resident #38), resulting in a shared television, an unkempt bathroom sink and difficulty in bed mobility with the feelings of less self-worth and frustration. Findings include: Resident #27: On 9/12/23, at 11:05 AM, Resident #27 was lying in their bed. There was a television (TV) hanging in the corner at their head of bed out of sight and unplugged. Resident #27 stated the TV didn't work but his roommate would share the TV on the wall at the end of the beds. Resident #27 stated sometimes he wants it all to himself but his roommate would be going home soon so then he would be able to have it all to himself. On 9/13/23, at 9:00 AM, an observation of Resident #27's bathroom revealed an approximate 2 inch by 6 inch area in the bathroom sink where the enamel had worn off leaving the porous area of the sink exposed. Resident #27 was not in his room. Resident #27's roommate offered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to collaborate with hospice services for one resident (Resident #2), resulting in hospice and the facility failing to establish an effective communication and collaborative process for Resident #2, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day. Findings Include: Resident #2: On [DATE], Resident #2 was observed watching television in her room. She provided yes and no questions to this writer as she had multiple tooth extractions the day prior. On [DATE] at approximately 2:00 PM, B Hall nurse was asked how hospice communicates with the facility. It was explained each resident had a hospice book that is at the nurse's station and she was asked for Resident #2's hospice book. B Hall nurse looked through many other hospice books and was unable to located Resident #2's book. On [DATE] at approximately 11:35 AM, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure suprapubic catheter (surgically created connection between the skin to the urinary bladder used to drain urine from the bladder) care was completed, per professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed resulting in lack of timely assessment/documentation, management, implementation of care, as ordered, and the likelihood for alterations in skin integrity and feelings of embarrassment utilizing the reasonable person concept related to leaking suprapubic catheter. Findings include: Resident #7: On 9/12/23 at 3:06 PM, Resident #7 was observed in a reclined Broda chair (padded, reclining wheeled chair with solid leg section for lower extremities and raised edges head) in their room. A urinary catheter drainage bag was noted on the chair. When spoke to, Resident #7 made eye contact but was unable to provide meaningful verbal responses. Record review revealed Resident #7 was originally admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC line - catheter inserted in the body through the arm that extends to the heart and is utilized for long term administration of intravenous [IV] medications) care for one resident (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed, resulting in a lack of dating on a PICC line dressing, Resident verbalization of concerns related to lack of care, and the likelihood for infection and alteration in overall health status. Findings include: Resident #24: On 9/12/23 at 11:53 AM, an observation and interview were completed with Resident #24 in their room. The Resident was in bed, positioned on their back. A PICC line was noted in the Resident's Right Upper Extremity (RUE). The PICC line dressing was undated. Resident #24 was asked why they had a PICC line and replied, Chemo. When queried if the facility staff maintained, assessed, and cared for the PICC line including completing dressing changes, Resident #24 revealed they are not going to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor and provide oxygen per physician's orders for one resident (Resident #6), resulting in a low oxygen saturation, no oxygen application with the likelihood of confusion and continued decreased oxygen blood saturation and respiratory complications. Findings include: Resident #6: On 9/12/23, at 10:28 AM, Resident #6 was resting in their bed with their eyes closed. There was an oxygen concentrator pushed between the bed and nightstand. The oxygen tubing was curled up inside a plastic bag hooked on the concentrator out of reach. On 9/12/23, at 3:00 PM, a record review of Resident #6's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Pacemaker and depression. Resident #6 required extensive with Activities of Daily Living and had impaired cognition. A review of the COPD care plan revealed OXYGEN SETTINGS: O2 via nasal prongs @ 2L (liters) continuous.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer Levothyroxine per physician's orders and alone on an empty stomach for three residents (Resident #6, Resident #26, Resident #38) resulting in increased dosages with the likelihood of malabsorption and increased signs and symptoms of Hypothyroidism. Findings include: Resident #6: On 9/12/23, at 3:00 PM, a record review of Resident #6's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Pacemaker and Hypothyroidism. Resident #6 required extensive with Activities of Daily Living and had impaired cognition. A review of the Medication Administration Record for September 2023 revealed Levothyroxine Sodium 88 MCG Tablet Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hypothyroid -Start Date- 06/08/2023 2000 Carvedilol Tablet 3.125 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day . 2000 . -Start Date- 06/08/2023 2000 Resident #26: On 9/13/2023, at 4:15 PM, a record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin correctly for two residents (Resident #26, Resident #28), resulting in the incorrect administration with the likelihood of not receiving the entire dose of insulin. Findings include: Resident #26: On 9/14/23, at 8:10 AM, During medication observation task, Nurse K was observed preparing Resident #26's morning insulin's. Nurse K prepared a Novolog Pen for injection. Nurse K cleaned the end of the Pen, applied a needle and turned the dial to 4 units. Nurse K then cleaned the end of Basaglar Insulin Pen for Resident #26. Nurse K cleaned the end of the Basaglar Pen, applied the needle and turned the dial to 15 units. Nurse K gathered the two insulin pens entered Resident #2''s room. Nurse K cleaned their skin, injected the Novolog Insulin Pen, pushed the dial down and waited 4 seconds. Nurse K then cleaned another area of their skin, injected the Basaglar Insulin Pen, pushed the dial down and waited 4 seconds. Resident #28: On 9/14/23, at 8:40 AM, Nurse K was observed preparing morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and label medications for one medication cart and the medication room, resulting in a multi-dose vial of Lidocaine left opened and undated and a medication cart being left unlocked and unattended for 7 minutes with the likelihood of cross-contamination, theft or medication misuse. Findings include: On 9/13/23, at 12:05 PM, the Medication cart in the B hall was pushed against the wall. The medication cart was unlocked. The drawers were facing out towards the hallway. There was one staff member sitting at the nurses' station on the phone. The nurse at the station hung the phone up and walked out of view. The Medication cart remained unlocked and out of view of any nurses. On 9/13/23, at 12:12 PM, the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) walked near the nurses' station. The ADON was asked if the medication carts are normally left unlocked while unattended and the ADON stated, no and locked the medication cart. On 9/13/23, at 2:49 PM, during medication storage task, an observation of the main medication room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.1+1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Medilodge of FarmingtonFarmington, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand BlancGrand Blanc, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of HowellHowell, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MarshallMarshall, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Montrose IncMontrose, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MunisingMunising, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Sault Ste. MarieSault Ste. Marie, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of SouthfieldSouthfield, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of WestwoodKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge at the ShoreGrand Haven, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Capital AreaLansing, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of CheboyganCheboygan, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of East LansingEast Lansing, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of FrankenmuthFrankenmuth, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of GTCTraverse City, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of KalamazooKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of LudingtonLudington, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of St. ClairEast China, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Sterling HeightsSterling Heights, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Campus AreaEast Lansing, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of HillmanHillman, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivingstonHowell, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivoniaLivonia, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Mt. PleasantMt. Pleasant, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of PortagePortage, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ShorelineSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Tawas CityTawas City, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of TaylorTaylor, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ZeelandZeeland, MI 3 of 5The Lodge at TaylorTaylor, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of GaylordGaylord, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of HollandHolland, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LansingLansing, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LeelanauSuttons Bay, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of MilfordMilford, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of OkemosOkemos, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of RichmondRichmond, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of Traverse CityTraverse City, MI

Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARK OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$427K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 6%Other / private 19%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $427K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,448per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$329per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235286. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next